Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

I’m 87 and my mortgage means I’ll owe my bank £200k when I sell my home


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

I’m 87 and my mortgage means I’ll owe my bank £200k when I sell my home

https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/money/property-and-mortgages/mortgage-means-owe-bank-sell-home-2968116

Quote

Brian Neville was 'desperate' when he took on a shared appreciation mortgage in the late 1990s. Now he regrets it. Brian Neville took out a mortgage for £20,000 in 1997, on a small bungalow in Poole, Dorset. Now, aged 87, he feels he cannot sell the property, believing if he did, he may owe his bank ten times this amount. Under the terms of Brian’s mortgage, if he sold his home, he would likely owe his lender, Bank of Scotland, around £200,000 – or ten times his initial mortgage size – from the sale. More than a quarter of a century later, he feels “trapped.”

The type of mortgage he took out was a shared appreciation mortgage (SAM), which was a type of equity release mortgage sold in the late 90s. Under this type of loan, the borrower releases equity in their home – in this case £20,000 – and gets a lower interest rate on the repayments. In return though, they owe the bank they borrowed from a share of the increase in their home’s value.

Brian bought the property for around £84,000 in 1997, after financial issues left him having to downsize. But he describes the process of getting the mortgage as “haphazard” and says he felt rushed into taking it by the advisor, who told him this type of mortgage would be removed from sale very soon. “Frankly I was desperate. I had absolutely nothing – no assets except the house – and so I believed this was my only choice,” he told i. He later found out that he would owe his lender, Bank of Scotland, 75 per cent of the profits on the property’s appreciation of value, which he said he had no idea about when he signed, as he thought it was 25 per cent. “I rang Bank of Scotland and was essentially told this is what I’d signed for – but at the time I just really needed the money”, he added.

If he were to sell the property now, he believes he would get around £350,000 from the sale, but under the terms of the mortgage, he would owe £200,000 of that money to his bank.

 

Edited by fellow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446
6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
29 minutes ago, msi said:

Oh look, a boomer with compo face looking for a bailout.

 

F*** him.

Such hatred!

Were you sexually abused by an elderly pervert when you were a child? Or are you just an ageist arse?

It's people like you that made the SNP introduce new laws (that I don't agree with) to shut you up! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
4 minutes ago, Bruce Banner said:

Such hatred!

Were you sexually abused by an elderly pervert when you were a child? Or are you just an ageist arse?

No. I'm an ar*e against self entitled tw*ts that think they are due compo because they can't make their own life decisions.

Strange how you complain against everyone else apart from said boomer demographic...

...are you an self entitled elderly pervert tw*t?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
14 minutes ago, msi said:

No. I'm an ar*e against self entitled tw*ts that think they are due compo because they can't make their own life decisions.

Strange how you complain against everyone else apart from said boomer demographic...

...are you an self entitled elderly pervert tw*t?

To the best of my knowledge, I have never compartmentalised any generation. Individuals, though, are fair game and you are an ageist arse!

 

Edited by Bruce Banner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
19 minutes ago, Frankie Teardrop said:

Does it really matter what you owe the bank at that age?
I guess it matters for the dependants hoping for a big payout...

Exactly no difference to renting at that age.......millions do, bank, landlord, council or care home......born with nothing, die with nothing, trying to stay as healthy as possible between the two dates.;)

Edited by winkie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415

He clears gross £65,000 (350-85-200). Lower interest rate on his repayments over 27 years. Better than renting for that time.

Did he not manage to pay off the £20, 000 mortgage over that time?.

Is the payment to bank based on when the mortgage is cleared or the house sold, whichever the later?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
2 hours ago, winkie said:

The moral of the story when someone needs the money they will often sign anything to pay what is necessary to get the money.;)

Very true and it only needs a sharp mortgage salesman with no soul to spot an opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417

This thread has stayed classy!

The guy is 87 - so why does he care? Be grateful you have lived six years longer than men of his generation.

He has also lived in a bungalow in a nice area like Poole - and his home is worth £270k more than he paid for it.

Could be a lot worse - he could have bought a bungalow in Hartlepool in 1997!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
9 minutes ago, Scorchio said:

Reminds me of this to be honest:

N7aVeTZ.jpeg

I wonder how much the Sunday Sport paid for that exclusive.

I was going to make a joke about his post eventually arriving at its intended location from the Royal Mail in a brown envelope!! But then decided against it.

Edited by MARTINX9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421
14 minutes ago, frederico said:

Brian isn’t very good with money is he

He has made £264k from sitting on his backside on his settee for 25 years in Poole - so much easier than working for it! A nurse would have to work and save lives for a decade after tax to make that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
14 minutes ago, MARTINX9 said:

He has made £264k from sitting on his backside on his settee for 25 years in Poole - so much easier than working for it! A nurse would have to work and save lives for a decade after tax to make that.

Or go on long term sick from NHS job and moonlight doing private care work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423

Guessing at his age it's more about having something to pass on to the kids and grandkids who've probably been expecting a share of that £350k when he dies. 

I get that it's disappointing but it is what it is. If he thinks he was mis-sold, take it up with the regulator, otherwise not a lot anyone can do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
6 hours ago, msi said:

No. I'm an ar*e against self entitled tw*ts that think they are due compo because they can't make their own life decisions.

Strange how you complain against everyone else apart from said boomer demographic...

...are you an self entitled elderly pervert tw*t?

Why the need to claim he was a boomer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information