Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Energy prices through the roof


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
5 hours ago, AThirdWay said:

Generation and insulation are two different things. Agreed, to get the best out of micro-generation good insulation is desirable, but not essential. Given the diverse housing in the UK, I would imagine the only way to fairly finance this would be a flat grant/loan, but it's a separate issue imo. 

If we are going down the heat pump route much better standards of insulation are needed at the same time.

I'm all for the grants.

 

5 hours ago, AThirdWay said:

EV's are a different issues and, as has been publicized recently, can act as storage devices themselves. This could reduce the dependency on any required grid storage facilities. Difficult to make a call on that given the fast moving development of possible fuel alternatives for vehicles. No point developing a grid based on EV battery storage if we move to hydrogen....

EVs cannot be much more than a short term buffer for the grid.  A system based on that would fall on its face with a short spell of weather with no wind.  The total capacity would not be big enough, and of course everyone would disconnect from the grid if they thought they couldn't recharge for days on end.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442
1 minute ago, kzb said:

If we are going down the heat pump route much better standards of insulation are needed at the same time.

I'm all for the grants.

 

EVs cannot be much more than a short term buffer for the grid.  A system based on that would fall on its face with a short spell of weather with no wind.  The total capacity would not be big enough, and of course everyone would disconnect from the grid if they thought they couldn't recharge for days on end.

 

Without grants to nudge change things won't happen......how long-term committed are TPTB?;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
1 minute ago, kzb said:

It won't just be me either.  There will be millions of us.  Forcing £50k costs onto all households will be electoral suicide.

BTW, I am not out of date, I am ahead of the curve.  No-one has come out with a half way feasible plan for net zero yet.  You certainly haven't, if anyone parrots anything it is you.  You keep parroting marketing material at us.

Well until the Greens turn up with a magic money tree you can all just keep paying bills that are 3 or 4 times times as big as they need be. 

Back in the real world. Yesterday the Dept. of Business and Energy announced the results of its latest renewable energy supply auction which secured 11GW of renewable electricity at a fraction of the price of gas power.

Including

2.2GW solar at £0.046/kWh

7GW offshore wind at £0.037/kWh

887MW onshore wind at £0.42/kWh

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
4 minutes ago, winkie said:

Without grants to nudge change things won't happen......how long-term committed are TPTB?;)

 

There have been grants for years (RHI = almost giving away ground source heat pumps until a couple of years ago) but these are now being phased out as the technology matures. 

The idea of grants for everybody is pie in the sky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
Just now, Confusion of VIs said:

Well until the Greens turn up with a magic money tree you can all just keep paying bills that are 3 or 4 times times as big as they need be. 

Back in the real world. Yesterday the Dept. of Business and Energy announced the results of its latest renewable energy supply auction which secured 11GW of renewable electricity at a fraction of the price of gas power.

Including

2.2GW solar at £0.046/kWh

7GW offshore wind at £0.037/kWh

887MW onshore wind at £0.42/kWh

 

 

What did I say about parroting marketing material?

I'm not interested in any price quotes which don't quote me the price of keeping me supplied 24/7 and all year round.  These prices do not do that. 

I keep telling you this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
5 minutes ago, Confusion of VIs said:

There have been grants for years (RHI = almost giving away ground source heat pumps until a couple of years ago) but these are now being phased out as the technology matures. 

The idea of grants for everybody is pie in the sky. 

Not asking for grants, not expecting grants.......that is why change will not be happening as quick or as smoothly as some might wish for, I do understand there are those with a financial vested interest in alternatives, the same as those that have a more interest in how the world is changing because of what the greed and selfishness of humanity is doing to it.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
5 hours ago, winkie said:

Without grants to nudge change things won't happen......how long-term committed are TPTB?;)

 

That's what I'm saying.  To meet targets there have to be some very generous grants.  That is particularly so if we go down the route of a disseminated power system as being discussed here.

That's going to stick in the craw of many on here, but if they want net zero by 2050 there is no getting round the cost whichever options are chosen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
2 hours ago, kzb said:

That's what I'm saying.  To meet targets there have to be some very generous grants.  That is particularly so if we go down the route of a disseminated power system as being discussed here.

That's going to stick in the craw of many on here, but if they want net zero by 2050 there is no getting round the cost whichever options are chosen.

Except any generous grant will have to be paid by the taxpayer, which is us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
12 minutes ago, winkie said:

.......and others will make from it one way or another.;)

They already are.   The oil companies of course, but a lesser-known beneficiary are the wind power suppliers who still benefit from the old subsidy system (pre-CfD). 

They get a flat rate subsidy per MWh but also sell their power at the market price.  They retain the subsidy however high the market price goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414
20 hours ago, kzb said:

What did I say about parroting marketing material?

I'm not interested in any price quotes which don't quote me the price of keeping me supplied 24/7 and all year round.  These prices do not do that. 

I keep telling you this.

 

You, or anyone else have no right to cheap energy, shelter, heat, food or clean water. End Of.  Ponder that when your bills come in this Winter. To be given that EVERYONE ELSE would be forced to pay for those that didn't want to provide for themselves, once the majority decide it's not worth the effort to be productive as "other" are forced to provide for them, it becomes easier and easier for the minority productive to agree the majority unproductive and not needed and Genocide of them is a better option. 

So what you want will never happen politically, get a loan, and sort your own energy and insulation problems. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
29 minutes ago, byron78 said:

EDF has been nationalised over in France.

I heard they went bust because of the price caps. So now Frances high energy bills will been socialised via taxpayer money.  I wonder where the axe of these tax increases will fall, and on whom?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
20 minutes ago, markyh said:

I heard they went bust because of the price caps. So now Frances high energy bills will been socialised via taxpayer money.  I wonder where the axe of these tax increases will fall, and on whom?  

In France? They'll just make the rich pay more I expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
17
HOLA4418
26 minutes ago, markyh said:

I heard they went bust because of the price caps. So now Frances high energy bills will been socialised via taxpayer money.  I wonder where the axe of these tax increases will fall, and on whom?  

They haven't got bust, but I'm sure they must be struggling. The state has an 84% stake, but can buy the rest for around 5 billion euros. To put that into perspective that's about 1/9th of the cost the UK lost to its track and trace app. There's a lot of investment going into new nuclear power stations, as the older ones come towards the end of their lifespan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
1 hour ago, crash-and-burn said:

They haven't got bust, but I'm sure they must be struggling. The state has an 84% stake, but can buy the rest for around 5 billion euros. To put that into perspective that's about 1/9th of the cost the UK lost to its track and trace app. There's a lot of investment going into new nuclear power stations, as the older ones come towards the end of their lifespan.

There's huge French state investment to move away from fossil fuels, apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421

There was an interesting article in times examining interesting developments for last month

Since Europe doesn’t have enough LNG (Germany really really ******ed up) there’s a glut of LNG gas in UK, but the pipeline to continent already maxed out

so gas is being burned in both UK and Ireland for last few months and electricity is flowing east at more or less max capacity of the interconnectors 

Like I said Germany really ******ed up in spending a trillion on renewables and still getting into bed with Russians and not building lng terminals, they also banned fracking, something like 10-15 years of gas in Germany alone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
4 hours ago, markyh said:

You, or anyone else have no right to cheap energy, shelter, heat, food or clean water. End Of.  Ponder that when your bills come in this Winter. To be given that EVERYONE ELSE would be forced to pay for those that didn't want to provide for themselves, once the majority decide it's not worth the effort to be productive as "other" are forced to provide for them, it becomes easier and easier for the minority productive to agree the majority unproductive and not needed and Genocide of them is a better option. 

So what you want will never happen politically, get a loan, and sort your own energy and insulation problems. 

I think you responded to the wrong post there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
23
HOLA4424
24
HOLA4425
On 07/07/2022 at 16:33, kzb said:

What did I say about parroting marketing material?

I'm not interested in any price quotes which don't quote me the price of keeping me supplied 24/7 and all year round.  These prices do not do that. 

Marketing being binding contract with companies that have passed now very tough financial stability checks?

NB I assume you regard Hinkley as just marketing.

On 07/07/2022 at 16:33, kzb said:

I keep telling you this.

I know and after all this time you still don't understand why your statement doesn't make any sense.

When the National Grid decides we need to let contracts for 24*7 power that is what the auctions will be for. However, we are still years away from needing that and in the meantime the cost of grid scale storage is rapidly falling.    

On 07/07/2022 at 16:44, winkie said:

Not asking for grants, not expecting grants.......that is why change will not be happening as quick or as smoothly as some might wish for, I do understand there are those with a financial vested interest in alternatives, the same as those that have a more interest in how the world is changing because of what the greed and selfishness of humanity is doing to it.;)

We are past needing blanket grants, 20yr low interest loans recovered via power bills (so out of the savings), forcing landlords to upgrade their properties to at least a B standard and developers to +A for all new properties  would be a good way forward. 

On 08/07/2022 at 11:14, kzb said:

They already are.   The oil companies of course, but a lesser-known beneficiary are the wind power suppliers who still benefit from the old subsidy system (pre-CfD). 

They get a flat rate subsidy per MWh but also sell their power at the market price.  They retain the subsidy however high the market price goes.

That's got a guaranteed minimum price, you thought it was a massive subsidy but it turns out they no longer need it.  Those companies took the risk of investing in a immature technology that turned out well, many people thought they would lose money at those prices. 

    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information