Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Government sleaze stories


Staffsknot

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
23 minutes ago, msi said:

All they care about right now is getting Paul Dacre into the Ofcom position.

Very dangerous when they eventually do. Full Goebbels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
56 minutes ago, byron78 said:

Sacked because of the government criticism by Lord Rothermere, apparently.

I'm told Greig was really his wife's preference.

Daily Mail has been doing well, but not happy the public are actually being informed instead of simply influenced.

That is an outrageous slur!

Lord Rothermere has previously confirmed under oath that he would never interfere in the editorial freedom of his papers!

As an aside, I note that Lord Ruthermere's great grandfather was a certain Alfred Harmsworth, who Wiki tells us was: "the father of several of the United Kingdom's leading newspaper proprietors, five of whom were honoured with hereditary titles – two viscounts, one baron and two baronets."

56 minutes ago, byron78 said:

Our good old "free press".

Indeed Sir, indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
30 minutes ago, byron78 said:

All they care about right now is getting Paul Dacre into the Ofcom position.

Very dangerous when they eventually do. Full Goebbels.

How anyone could even consider taking someone from the media, let alone one of the most partial rags, is beyond me?

 

I wonder what BoJo's Tories will think of next? 

 

Owen Patterson - MPs Standards

Matt Hancock - Family Values

why not go full whacko and put Gary Glitter for Children's minister?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
1 hour ago, msi said:

Doris is as thick as mince.

Makes Cheesefinger Liz Truss look bookish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
58 minutes ago, byron78 said:

But that's blatantly wrong?

It also removes any ability you have to remove the more corrupt governments.

And this one... wow.

It seems you are suggesting that the best way to remove a corrupt government is...the system which put it there in the first place.

This is like suggesting smoking as a cure for cancer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
5 minutes ago, Locke said:

It seems you are suggesting that the best way to remove a corrupt government is...the system which put it there in the first place.

This is like suggesting smoking as a cure for cancer.

Democracy? Yeah. Awful system.

 

 

Edited by byron78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
1 minute ago, byron78 said:

No it isn't you utter dolt.

What a highbrow response. It must have won you many a debate.

1 minute ago, byron78 said:

Your options are not anarchy or corruption government.

Yes, they literally are.

Government is founded upon the initiation of violence. It is always immoral and will always become corrupt.

Like any immorality, there is a binary and a scale. It is either happening or not, and if it is happening, there is a range of badness. Stealing 1% of a person's wealth is theft, just the same as stealing 100% of their wealth is. Just because you would choose one over the other if forced into a choice, does not make either "not theft".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
29 minutes ago, Locke said:

What a highbrow response. It must have won you many a debate.

Yes, they literally are.

Government is founded upon the initiation of violence. It is always immoral and will always become corrupt.

Like any immorality, there is a binary and a scale. It is either happening or not, and if it is happening, there is a range of badness. Stealing 1% of a person's wealth is theft, just the same as stealing 100% of their wealth is. Just because you would choose one over the other if forced into a choice, does not make either "not theft".

Taxes are a lot older than government. Far far older than democratic government as well.

But this is not worth my time. Can't be bothered with binary positions now. Pointless, stupid, and immature. Blocked.

Edited by byron78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
45 minutes ago, byron78 said:

Taxes are a lot older than government. Far far older than democratic government as well.

But this is not worth my time. Can't be bothered with binary positions now. Pointless, stupid, and immature. Blocked.

Specifically the Income Tax was a 20rh century thing.  

It was also meant to be temporary to pay for war and levied on the most wealthiest 

Most people did not pay it or care for it .

Now millions are paying 40%+

It is shameful and ought to be repealed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414
50 minutes ago, byron78 said:

Taxes are a lot older than government. Far far older than democratic government as well.

But this is not worth my time. Can't be bothered with binary positions now. Pointless, stupid, and immature. Blocked.

250 years ago you would have been one of the azzholes trying to prevent to abolition of slavery using broadly identical talking points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
6 minutes ago, Warlord said:

Specifically the Income Tax was a 20rh century thing.  

It was also meant to be temporary to pay for war and levied on the most wealthiest 

Most people did not pay it or care for it .

Now millions are paying 40%+

It is shameful and ought to be repealed.

 

It is a fair point.

Taxes did used to be on wealth and land.

But obviously that won't happen again without some mad Corbynista getting in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
4 minutes ago, byron78 said:

It is a fair point.

Taxes did used to be on wealth and land.

But obviously that won't happen again without some mad Corbynista getting in.

 

 

Too late, alas. Too late.

Nothing and no-one will save the UK from national bankruptcy!

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/interest-payments-on-government-debt-doubled-year-on-year-in-october/ar-AAQTvvF

 

AAQTD1U.img?h=480&w=799&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f

 

 

The government's interest payments more than doubled as the government racked up another £18.8billion of borrowing last month.

The cost of servicing the debt mountain hit £5.6billion in October, up from just £1.8billion in the same month of 2020.

Although the bill is still relatively low, the spike underlines the UK's exposure after the pandemic hammered the public finances.

There are concerns about inflation driving up interest rates and government costs further.     

Figures released by the Office for National Statistics showed the speed of the reduction in borrowing after the crisis has fallen sharply.

The number for October was just £200million less than recorded a year ago, when the country was still under restrictions, and the second highest on record for the month. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
15 minutes ago, zugzwang said:

 

Too late, alas. Too late.

Nothing and no-one will save the UK from national bankruptcy!

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/interest-payments-on-government-debt-doubled-year-on-year-in-october/ar-AAQTvvF

 

AAQTD1U.img?h=480&w=799&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f

 

 

The government's interest payments more than doubled as the government racked up another £18.8billion of borrowing last month.

The cost of servicing the debt mountain hit £5.6billion in October, up from just £1.8billion in the same month of 2020.

Although the bill is still relatively low, the spike underlines the UK's exposure after the pandemic hammered the public finances.

There are concerns about inflation driving up interest rates and government costs further.     

Figures released by the Office for National Statistics showed the speed of the reduction in borrowing after the crisis has fallen sharply.

The number for October was just £200million less than recorded a year ago, when the country was still under restrictions, and the second highest on record for the month. 

Borrowed from whom?

Are we just printing or are we actually in hock?

Inflation looks more likely to me (but my eyes are old).

Edited by byron78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421

Greensill: State bank risked £335m to back lender, say MPs

 

Taxpayers may be liable for up to £335m after a government bank failed to scrutinise collapsed lender Greensill Capital properly, MPs have said.

A Public Accounts Committee report on the British Business Bank's Covid loan scheme said checks to approve the company were "woefully inadequate".

Greensill went on to lend £418m to companies, 80% of which may have to be repaid by taxpayers if they default.

Ex-PM David Cameron was an adviser to the lender, which collapsed in March.

 

Go on Tory Boys, tell me how its all ImMiGrAnTs AnD sCrOunGeRs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
On 19/11/2021 at 09:40, byron78 said:

All they care about right now is getting Paul Dacre into the Ofcom position.

Very dangerous when they eventually do. Full Goebbels.

Looks like the furore of Tory Sleaze has a silver lining

Dacre rails at civil service as he pulls out of Ofcom running

Paul Dacre, the former Daily Mail editor, has pulled out of the running to chair UK media regulator Ofcom, amid fears in Conservative circles that his candidacy might have inflamed the Westminster “sleaze” row....Dacre added that he was taking up an “exciting new job” in the private sector.

 

any ideas on where this 'exciting' job is?  My guess is with GB News / Fox UK but only if they drop their silly LiBeRaL leaning :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
On 11/18/2021 at 1:23 PM, msi said:

Last time I check Unions have to ballot members to provide Political affiliation - and they can opt out

Also Union proposals are put before Labour just as all other proposals - No smoke filled back room deals in friends villas or with Foreign Governments

Yeah my point was Johnson admittedselling peerages - wtf are people waiting for he's basically admitted breaking the law

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
24
HOLA4425
7 hours ago, msi said:

Looks like the furore of Tory Sleaze has a silver lining

Dacre rails at civil service as he pulls out of Ofcom running

Paul Dacre, the former Daily Mail editor, has pulled out of the running to chair UK media regulator Ofcom, amid fears in Conservative circles that his candidacy might have inflamed the Westminster “sleaze” row....Dacre added that he was taking up an “exciting new job” in the private sector.

 

any ideas on where this 'exciting' job is?  My guess is with GB News / Fox UK but only if they drop their silly LiBeRaL leaning :)

 

Gotta be Gbeebies and that will really rile Neil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information