DiggerUK Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 (edited) The Bank of England has persuaded major banks to hold on to proposed dividend payments and maintain as cash reserves.I cannot recall this happening before, isn't the BOE supposed to be there as the 'lender of last resort' If banks are going to need higher cash reserves, will this not also be the case with businesses. Are we now to expect the same message from government to be made for businesses to suspend dividend payments. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52114410 This is also now the position of the ECB. https://finanz.dk/ecb-may-force-banks-to-delay-dividends-if-they-dont-comply-video/ The ramifications of this are potentially enormous for anybody relying on dividend income, or for reinvestment in portfolios..._ Edited April 1, 2020 by DiggerUK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 Will they suspend bonuses aswell? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiggerUK Posted April 1, 2020 Author Share Posted April 1, 2020 3 minutes ago, Si1 said: Will they suspend bonuses as well? They have been requested to do so, at this moment the banks haven't responded......quelle surprise..._ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regprentice Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 5 minutes ago, Si1 said: Will they suspend bonuses aswell? They've been asked to suspend bonuses for 'senior staff and traders'. Not that many people get bonuses nowadays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 Lessons learned from Gordon Brown bailing out the bankers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winkie Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 1 hour ago, DiggerUK said: They have been requested to do so, at this moment the banks haven't responded......quelle surprise..._ speaks volumes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluestone59 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 1 hour ago, DiggerUK said: The Bank of England has persuaded major banks to hold on to proposed dividend payments and maintain as cash reserves.I cannot recall this happening before, isn't the BOE supposed to be there as the 'lender of last resort' If banks are going to need higher cash reserves, will this not also be the case with businesses. Are we now to expect the same message from government to be made for businesses to suspend dividend payments. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52114410 This is also now the position of the ECB. https://finanz.dk/ecb-may-force-banks-to-delay-dividends-if-they-dont-comply-video/ The ramifications of this are potentially enormous for anybody relying on dividend income, or for reinvestment in portfolios..._ Yes they are but how could it be right for the banks to pay divis as if all were normal and then have to go to the B of E for a sub because they've made too many bad loans. Dividends have inevitably an element of risk, despite Motley Fool and others saying pile into this and get 4.7% as you can be sure the Divi will be maintained. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluestone59 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 I saw this reported earlier today as an event which had taken place not an unresolved request. Or was that just journalism? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regprentice Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 2 minutes ago, Bluestone59 said: I saw this reported earlier today as an event which had taken place not an unresolved request. Or was that just journalism? The dividends is happening for the banks noted below, the bonuses is just a request. In a series of coordinated statements the UK’s largest lenders – including Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, Royal Bank of Scotland and Standard Chartered confirmed on Tuesday that they would temporarily halt shareholder payouts and share buybacks for 2019 and throughout 2020 following discussions with the Bank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluestone59 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 3 minutes ago, regprentice said: The dividends is happening for the banks noted below, the bonuses is just a request. In a series of coordinated statements the UK’s largest lenders – including Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, Royal Bank of Scotland and Standard Chartered confirmed on Tuesday that they would temporarily halt shareholder payouts and share buybacks for 2019 and throughout 2020 following discussions with the Bank. Yes, thank you I realised that just after I posted. Logically, shouldn't the divis be paid first as the shareholders own the bank? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 16 minutes ago, Bluestone59 said: Yes they are but how could it be right for the banks to pay divis as if all were normal and then have to go to the B of E for a sub because they've made too many bad loans. Dividends have inevitably an element of risk, despite Motley Fool and others saying pile into this and get 4.7% as you can be sure the Divi will be maintained. Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddog Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 (edited) This is absolutely shocking, it has massive implications for the future, the government/BoE can now micro manage firms to the point where they can't pay dividends. It starts with banks as they are an easy target, but I'm sure this could come to other industries. Begs the question, what is the point of owning shares? Also, this has happened under a so called conservative government, looks like Boris is Jeremy Corbyn in disguise at the moment! Edited April 1, 2020 by reddog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, reddog said: This is absolutely shocking, it has massive implications for the future, the government/BoE can now micro manage firms to the point where they can't pay dividends. It starts with banks as they are an easy target, but I'm sure this could come to other industries. Begs the question, what is the point of owning shares? Also, this has happened under a so called conservative government, looks like Boris is Jeremy Corbyn in disguise at the moment! In the case of the banks it's because we know they are going to have to be bailed out. This is just so the lights stay on, not so they can make profits. Much of the economy is going to be nationalised, necessarily, imho, over the coming months. A responsible government would re privatised it after the dust settles. In the case of the railways I would hope they make a better job of it than first time around. Edited April 1, 2020 by Si1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Roady Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Si1 said: Lessons learned from Gordon Brown bailing out the bankers The only lessons learnt from that debacle was that the Banks can do what they like in a consequence free environment. All else is just lessons...nothing learned. Edited April 1, 2020 by Roman Roady Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Roady Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 30 minutes ago, reddog said: Begs the question, what is the point of owning shares? That, Detective, is the right question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dances with sheeple Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nothernsoul Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 This isnt jeremy corbyn style state socialism with an ideological motivation, or a motivation to conscious ly alter the balance of power between capital and labour. It is a purely pragmatic move, with the intention of preserving the status quo and the power of the elite as far as possible. Their banker mates may be unhappy being bullied into forgoing dividends and lending money to companies that might go bump, but it is a cost worth paying. The alternative they fear, is the whole debt pile coming crashing down and the public turning on them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkG Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 8 hours ago, Si1 said: A responsible government would re privatised it after the dust settles. In the case of the railways I would hope they make a better job of it than first time around. This time, Britain won't be in the EU, so it won't be forced by EU rules to privatize the railways in such a retarded fashion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 4 minutes ago, MarkG said: This time, Britain won't be in the EU, so it won't be forced by EU rules to privatize the railways in such a retarded fashion. Indeed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regprentice Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 HSBC reportedly under pressure to move their HQ from London to HK after the UK govt 'siezed' Asian investors dividends. For the regulators at the Bank of England to put a gun to the head of the board of directors is terrible,” said one director. “This should be a decision for the board to take. We should not be in the UK. The calls for redomiciling will increase Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longtermrenter Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 8 hours ago, nothernsoul said: This isnt jeremy corbyn style state socialism with an ideological motivation, or a motivation to conscious ly alter the balance of power between capital and labour. It is a purely pragmatic move, with the intention of preserving the status quo and the power of the elite as far as possible. Their banker mates may be unhappy being bullied into forgoing dividends and lending money to companies that might go bump, but it is a cost worth paying. The alternative they fear, is the whole debt pile coming crashing down and the public turning on them. Thanks - I think you have summed up what I have been thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winkie Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 16 hours ago, reddog said: This is absolutely shocking, it has massive implications for the future, the government/BoE can now micro manage firms to the point where they can't pay dividends. It starts with banks as they are an easy target, but I'm sure this could come to other industries. Begs the question, what is the point of owning shares? Also, this has happened under a so called conservative government, looks like Boris is Jeremy Corbyn in disguise at the moment! You could say though that many shares should not be the price they are now.....manipulated on the way up, manipulation on the way down....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah-so Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 9 hours ago, MarkG said: This time, Britain won't be in the EU, so it won't be forced by EU rules to privatize the railways in such a retarded fashion. Forced? We didn't privatise the railways due to EU rules. SNCF is still state-owned along with lots of other European countries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottbeard Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 18 hours ago, Bluestone59 said: Logically, shouldn't the divis be paid first as the shareholders own the bank? Not really - most businesses pay their employees first, with the business owner keeping profit that remains. 17 hours ago, reddog said: Begs the question, what is the point of owning shares? Since this is the first EVER time that the government has asked this, and we are essentially in a wartime situation, the point of owning shares is that MOST years you get a dividend... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah-so Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 1 hour ago, regprentice said: HSBC reportedly under pressure to move their HQ from London to HK after the UK govt 'siezed' Asian investors dividends. For the regulators at the Bank of England to put a gun to the head of the board of directors is terrible,” said one director. “This should be a decision for the board to take. We should not be in the UK. The calls for redomiciling will increase HSBC directors and shareholders know that there are very good reasons not to be legally domiciled in a jurisdiction ultimately run by the CCP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.