Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Should fat people have to have registration numbers and insurance?

JoeDavola

By JoeDavola
in The off-topic forum

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446
6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
winkie

winkie

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, ntb said:

They should wear lights at night, indicate if they are going to change direction and obey traffic lights. Lycra is optional.

If we are going to be judgemental so should skinny, boney, gaunt people then, you can't see them coming, nothing of them, easily damaged.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
CunningPlan

CunningPlan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Riedquat said:

Before this goes any further, how fat are we talking about? Even at 6'3" being around the 17 stone mark is too heavy by quite a bit but I insist on "overweight" rather than "fat" (and yes, it's all my own fault for being lazy and greedy).

I'm 6'4" and 15 stone. If you are merely overweight, I must be svelt. My good lady disagrees.

Can we start a 'road to 30% body fat' thread? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
13
HOLA4414
Bossybabe

Bossybabe

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Riedquat said:

Before this goes any further, how fat are we talking about? Even at 6'3" being around the 17 stone mark is too heavy by quite a bit but I insist on "overweight" rather than "fat" (and yes, it's all my own fault for being lazy and greedy).

Cruel...it could be glandular. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
16
HOLA4417
Errol

Errol

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Riedquat said:

Before this goes any further, how fat are we talking about? Even at 6'3" being around the 17 stone mark is too heavy by quite a bit but I insist on "overweight" rather than "fat" (and yes, it's all my own fault for being lazy and greedy).

Weight isn't the relevant point. Most Heavyweight boxers are 16-17st +.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
crashmonitor

crashmonitor

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Riedquat said:

They've got rather a lot more muscle than I'm ever likely to have. I'm working on the assumption that I'm not planning on adding much more muscle.

I'd imagine that level of muscle isn't healthy a big strain on the heart and short longevity. Meanwhile you can be heavy boned and above average build via wrist and ankle measurement and have the optimal amount of muscle being slim. The assumption on here is you can't. Being a biased slim sod.:mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421
21
HOLA4422
spyguy

spyguy

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, crashmonitor said:

I'd imagine that level of muscle isn't healthy a big strain on the heart and short longevity. Meanwhile you can be heavy boned and above average build via wrist and ankle measurement and have the optimal amount of muscle being slim. The assumption on here is you can't. Being a biased slim sod.:mellow:

I think being hit in the head a lot fcks most heavy weights up rather than heart strain ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
22
HOLA4423
Will!

Will!

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Riedquat said:

Before this goes any further, how fat are we talking about? Even at 6'3" being around the 17 stone mark is too heavy by quite a bit but I insist on "overweight" rather than "fat" (and yes, it's all my own fault for being lazy and greedy).

Waist measurement (at the level of the navel) more than 50% of height is a good definition of fat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

  I accept