Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

The House Size - Car Size Disconnect


ChewingGrass

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

Just realised that in the same time frame that new houses have got smaller cars have got correspondingly bigger. Have been watching with some amusement all the large SUV/Merc/AUDI type cars trying to squeeze through a chicane of parked vehicles in my twee estate this morning and come to the conclusion that as global manufacturers swing to one floorpan suits all for both American and European markets we have been left with the consequences of this and vehicular vanity.

Can't for the life of me see why people are so stupid as to put up with the hassle of driving a car that is as big if not bigger in some cases as a transit van!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1
HOLA442
19 minutes ago, ChewingGrass said:

Just realised that in the same time frame that new houses have got smaller cars have got correspondingly bigger. Have been watching with some amusement all the large SUV/Merc/AUDI type cars trying to squeeze through a chicane of parked vehicles in my twee estate this morning and come to the conclusion that as global manufacturers swing to one floorpan suits all for both American and European markets we have been left with the consequences of this and vehicular vanity.

Can't for the life of me see why people are so stupid as to put up with the hassle of driving a car that is as big if not bigger in some cases as a transit van!

I live on a shite 2006 built estate and I see this. A chicane which is very narrow, cars parked on the section of the chicane where pedestrians are supposed to work and houses slap bang opposite one another c. 30 foot apart. Nice view into the bedrooms of the neighbours opposite. An ugly white whale of a 14 reg BMW 520d is parked in the drive of a plain looking semi. A bit 'keeping up with the Joneses' around here, which I detest.

Not just this but these cars are always parked in the drive and not the garage. I park my 13 year old sub £1,000 value car in the garage underneith the 'coach house' style flat I rent but the neighbours prefer to park their £20,000 cars outside, exposed to the elements while their junk (maybe worth less than £100) is stored in the garages! :blink: Maybe cars are so large that they don't fit in the garages. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443

Audi Q7 is 75mm longer but 20mm narrower than a Transit Custom so in all intents and purposes it is the same size.

The Q7 starts at £47600 whereas the transit starts at £22000 and finishes at £33000 for the spunked up one with alloys, leather seats and the most powerful engine.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446

I am often in many many traffic jams as someone tries to turn there panzer in a typically british street and has to do a many point turn. Its usually tiny women driving these monsters too while sitting on a  cushion.

I love having a little car. You get everywhere much faster, you find spaces easier and driving is much less stressful. My little car has all the features too, leather seats nice stereo, sat nav. I can see no reasons for a panzer outside of ego. If I need to carry big stuff i rent or borrow a transit.

The only difference between one of these and me on british streets is that every 10 minutes they throw a tenner out the window while we are both stuck in the same traffic.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
On ‎09‎/‎10‎/‎2016 at 8:07 PM, Inoperational Bumblebee said:

It's not just the size. Council estate near me is packed to the brim with expensive German cars!

I guess cars are just ridiculously cheap compared to houses these days.

If you go back to the 1980s, a luxury detached house in a good SE commuter town was probably around £250k, and a 'commensurate' car to park on the drive about £25k new.

Now that house would be £2m+ and the car about £50k, so in some ways it is not a surprise to see the equivalent car outside a £500k flat or terraced house instead.

In fact, it is often the £2m+ houses often have old, cheap cars outside now. Is that because the owners don't car about cars or because they are spending all of their money on the house?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
46 minutes ago, worried1 said:

I guess cars are just ridiculously cheap compared to houses these days.

If you go back to the 1980s, a luxury detached house in a good SE commuter town was probably around £250k, and a 'commensurate' car to park on the drive about £25k new.

Now that house would be £2m+ and the car about £50k, so in some ways it is not a surprise to see the equivalent car outside a £500k flat or terraced house instead.

In fact, it is often the £2m+ houses often have old, cheap cars outside now. Is that because the owners don't car about cars or because they are spending all of their money on the house?

That, and the PCP/ HP deals on cars making expensive ones 'affordable'. All about the monthly payment, innit.

Regarding the £2m+ houses, I suspect there's a class thing going on there. Upper middle-class people seem to be less about conspicuous consumption i.e. will have the 10 year old Volvo estate outside because they don't need to make a show of being rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
1 hour ago, spunko2010 said:

I'd take a £33k transit over a Q7 any day. I love the go faster stripes on the top end ones, tacky but of course necessary.


 While we're on the subject I do like the "M Sport" chavvy transits you see, eg: http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201609157800065

That is amazing

I would put  a pop top on it and a day van conversion so I could adventure all over europe in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
8 hours ago, spunko2010 said:

I'd take a £33k transit over a Q7 any day. I love the go faster stripes on the top end ones, tacky but of course necessary.


 While we're on the subject I do like the "M Sport" chavvy transits you see, eg: http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201609157800065

Wow, some impressive tranny action right there. :blink:

Cooler than a bodykitted Vauxhall Zafira or similar MPV...which just make the drivers look a bit desperate to be cool imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
16
HOLA4417
17
HOLA4418

I traveled through a new housing estate that's been built on the old Orgreave coking plant/open cast mine in Sheffield recently. There are a mix of new 4 bed detached, semis and terraced houses (sorry, town houses). It was striking how most drives had new or newish German cars on their drives. If you were a keep up with the Jones's type I imagine you'd be pretty distraught if you had to have a Vauxhall on your drive.

I pretty sure that the majority of them are lease hire (or HP/on the tick as we used to say!) either via a company or a personal contract. And that most 'owners' are shelling out £4 - £5k per year to rent a car from Audi, VW, or BMW. Forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
On 31/10/2016 at 0:57 PM, newbonic said:

I traveled through a new housing estate that's been built on the old Orgreave coking plant/open cast mine in Sheffield recently. There are a mix of new 4 bed detached, semis and terraced houses (sorry, town houses). It was striking how most drives had new or newish German cars on their drives. If you were a keep up with the Jones's type I imagine you'd be pretty distraught if you had to have a Vauxhall on your drive.

I pretty sure that the majority of them are lease hire (or HP/on the tick as we used to say!) either via a company or a personal contract. And that most 'owners' are shelling out £4 - £5k per year to rent a car from Audi, VW, or BMW. Forever.

It's the future innit. Everything on credit, sod it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
On 10/31/2016 at 0:57 PM, newbonic said:

I traveled through a new housing estate that's been built on the old Orgreave coking plant/open cast mine in Sheffield recently. There are a mix of new 4 bed detached, semis and terraced houses (sorry, town houses). It was striking how most drives had new or newish German cars on their drives. If you were a keep up with the Jones's type I imagine you'd be pretty distraught if you had to have a Vauxhall on your drive.

I pretty sure that the majority of them are lease hire (or HP/on the tick as we used to say!) either via a company or a personal contract. And that most 'owners' are shelling out £4 - £5k per year to rent a car from Audi, VW, or BMW. Forever.

I mow a couple of lawns on there. The place looks like a BMW showroom, it's a bit weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422

Manufacturing has progressed, housebuilding hasn't and land has been restricted. Relatively, cars are cheap and productivity is orders of magnitude better than the housing industry, houses absurdly expensive as a result. There's real competition in the automative sector and very little in housing - almost a closed shop due to land banking. I looked for years for land and never found any suitable for self build.

Contract hire rates (very low at the moment) are highly reliant on residual values. Those will collapse when put to the test and the whole financing model will fall apart just like the debt/housing model did.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
On 10/18/2016 at 2:34 PM, worried1 said:

I guess cars are just ridiculously cheap compared to houses these days.

If you go back to the 1980s, a luxury detached house in a good SE commuter town was probably around £250k, and a 'commensurate' car to park on the drive about £25k new.

Now that house would be £2m+ and the car about £50k, so in some ways it is not a surprise to see the equivalent car outside a £500k flat or terraced house instead.

In fact, it is often the £2m+ houses often have old, cheap cars outside now. Is that because the owners don't car about cars or because they are spending all of their money on the house?

Cars are subject to the forces of a free market.  Accordingly,  they get better.   Any which were badly built,  poorly designed,  smaller and yet more expensive that those built ten years ago wouldn't sell and the manufacturers would go bust.  

The housing market doesn't have such inconvenient market forces to improve its output and the state interferes in a way which restricts output,  stifles competition and results in a smaller,  more expensive product,  all to the detriment of the consumer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information