athom Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Actually boycotting Scotland will be ILLEGAL for residents of the "land of the free" unless it has been officially sanctioned, which i doubt. So anyone from Broonland who cares can report any attempts to encourage an unsanctioned boycott to the Unenlightend States of America Anti-Boycott Compliance Bureau - http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforc...tcompliance.htm They set this law up to prevent people from freely choosing to boycott Israel but i don't see why it shouldn't apply to another occupied nation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Dundee Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Actually boycotting Scotland will be ILLEGAL for residents of the "land of the free" unless it has been officially sanctioned, which i doubt. So anyone from Broonland who cares can report any attempts to encourage an unsanctioned boycott to the Unenlightend States of America Anti-Boycott Compliance Bureau - http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforc...tcompliance.htm They set this law up to prevent people from freely choosing to boycott Israel but i don't see why it shouldn't apply to another occupied nation Excellent find. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singlemalt Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Completely on the fence so I'll continue drinking both Bourbon and Singlemalt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erranta Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 (edited) But the US has released terrorists too. One can't draw an exact parallel between the Al Megrahi case and Guantanamo Bay situations for several reasons. Megrahi was convicted in court whereas most of the Guantanamo cases are sort of POWs who have not been charged or tried. Also Libya's regime was left-wing extremist rather than radical islamist.But some prisoners have been released from Guantanamo Bay who have subsequently returned to Al Qaeda and anti-western activities. And it must be remembered that a lot of Americans supported IRA terrorism, as they had some sort of romantic notion about Irish roots, which turned out on further investigation to be protestant, or 'Scots-Irish' in many cases, including Bill Clinton, I believe! Well spotted! I too have read 'independent' page stuff about Libya and their authorities who actually jail (or throw out of the country) hard line extremist Muslim stirrers! Amazing how we are 'manipulated' into thinking otherwise by twisted illuminati 'controlled' media! Edited August 23, 2009 by erranta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1929crash Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Actually boycotting Scotland will be ILLEGAL for residents of the "land of the free" unless it has been officially sanctioned, which i doubt. So anyone from Broonland who cares can report any attempts to encourage an unsanctioned boycott to the Unenlightend States of America Anti-Boycott Compliance Bureau - http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforc...tcompliance.htm They set this law up to prevent people from freely choosing to boycott Israel but i don't see why it shouldn't apply to another occupied nation Well done, athom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dances with sheeple Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Gordon Brown's head? The big one I hope you mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammysnake Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 so the UK throws a deal with Libya, releases a murderer. Frankly, who gives a f u c k ? Morality in politics has all but vanished hasn't it.The yanks had been bankrolling the IRA for decades, murdering innocent people, they finally agreed a deal in which convicted murderers were released on the grounds of reconciliation And now it seems the Yanks want the British to conduct a forever changing American Foreign policy? No more you see. Britain moves onwards, the days of empire have moved on and it's time the UK invested in it's own foreign policy. Oh I like the Yanks. But f u c k to this daft duplicity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowrentyieldmakessense(honest!) Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 http://www.boycottscotland.com/I really don't like this. Initially thought it was being run by a bunch of right wing lunatics, but it appears to be more mainstream than that. Just checked out a few news message boards in the US - very anti Scottish and British (we're cancelling our holidays / business, etc.). One poor confused chap had even decided to put off his plans to holiday in Ireland. "Unless the Scottish government rescinds this decision to release al-Megrahi, and if the British Parliament continues to avoid intervening in the matter, we urge all Americans to protest this action by boycotting the United Kingdom and Scotland in full. Don't travel to Scotland or do business there (or in the United Kingdom in general) and don't buy any British or Scottish products." can brown stop buying their dollars this will help them have to live withing their means and stop relying on borrowed money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RentingForever Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 From the Boycott Scotland site: "Ireland has been advocated by many as the best alternative to those who regularly travel to and conduct business in Scotland." <sarcasm>... because Ireland (both parts) has a long history of not freeing terrorists, presumably.</sarcasm> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dances with sheeple Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 It's all about access to Libya's oil and gas reservesI suspect the CIA was heavily involved in the Lockerbie bombing They wanted and excuse to bomb Gadhaffi and their usual modus operandi is to engineer terrorist events What a bunch of lying hypocrites they all are. Meanwhile, dumb bovine American's comfortably lap up all the antiBritish/Scottish sentiment Sickening I know someone who was sitting there when it came down. He says the "spooks" were all over the area within an hour, totally sealed. Local police let him smoke a joint as they interviewed him, they were only interested in a detailed account of what he`d seen, and if he had touched any wreckage which was lying all over the place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 !!Newsflash!! Newly updated Yankee Axis of Evil: Afghanistan North Korea Iraq Jockland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1929crash Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 !!Newsflash!! Newly updated Yankee Axis of Evil: Afghanistan North Korea Iraq Jockland Brilliant! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hev Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 If the Doctor's who diagnosed him are the same ones as those who assess people on incapacity benefits for their fitness to work, then I think we can look forward to seeing McGrahey running the Tripoli marathon. Or the psych who diagnosed Saunders of the Guiness scandal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number79 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 The yanks have been screwing us for years. They have screwed us everyday since the war, to make sure that the empire was dead, that they would rule supreme and that we would fall in line. Anyone shocked at this treatment by our special friends, cousins and allies needs to do a little reading. As for the bomber, I think he should have been left to die in prison then been burried face down in the prison compost heap but then I am not incharge and aren't securing oil for this doomed country. As for the sceptics, feck 'em. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankus Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 where is brown anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest anorthosite Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Jockland Don't f**k with Supergran: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-sRNl6JmA8 Does things your granny wouldn't apparently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambie Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 where is brown anyway Guido presumes he's over at http://www.savonlinnafestivals.com/en_index.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest anorthosite Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Guido presumes he's over at http://www.savonlinnafestivals.com/en_index.htm Finally! A sport we might bring home the gold in (If he doesn't sell it off first) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radge Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Well, despite being the biggest news story of the day the boycottscotland.com petition at http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/boycott-s...bie-bomberbomer appears to have amassed 285 signatures, a fair few of whom seem to be Brits with 'fook you, yank' messages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6538 Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 Jockland Tynemouth, to be really sad and pedantic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hounslow Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 The downright hypocrisy of statements coming out of the US is staggering. For every accusation they make why isn't someone mentioning their government's rape of Iraq and their corporations that profited from it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the end is a bit nigher Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 I'm pissed off he was released but only 'cos I think he didn't do it. As for the interbred faggots in the US, the fewer of them that come over here the better. They are a complete ******ing waste of space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 I take the pragmatic view. If he had been kept in prison until he had died, just how do you provide proper medical care with all that nursing a terminal patient requires? True, some types of terminal illness such as Myra Hindley's can be managed in prison, but others, needing perhaps radio active treatments, modified poisons etc. and resulting perhaps in extreme incontinence, fits, or needing resuccitation or other emergency procedures cannot be managed in a prison. Those who feel that he should have been left to rot without compassion should consider the impact on the Islamic World, besides the inhumanity of such an action. Failure to provide treatment would leave us open to the accusation that we left him to die, when he could have been saved with medical intervention. (c/f Bobby Sands etc.) If we had built a private hospital in the prison to adequately care for him, you can just imagine the uproar from the tax payer. The man is dying, the only real option would have been to remove him to an NHS Hospital and provide enormous security. His subsequent death would have fuelled the conspiracy theorists, particularly as there seems to be reason to believe him to have been innocent. Better to send him home to die in the full glare of the press spotlight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1929crash Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 I take the pragmatic view. If he had been kept in prison until he had died, just how do you provide proper medical care with all that nursing a terminal patient requires? True, some types of terminal illness such as Myra Hindley's can be managed in prison, but others, needing perhaps radio active treatments, modified poisons etc. and resulting perhaps in extreme incontinence, fits, or needing resuccitation or other emergency procedures cannot be managed in a prison. Those who feel that he should have been left to rot without compassion should consider the impact on the Islamic World, besides the inhumanity of such an action. Failure to provide treatment would leave us open to the accusation that we left him to die, when he could have been saved with medical intervention. (c/f Bobby Sands etc.) If we had built a private hospital in the prison to adequately care for him, you can just imagine the uproar from the tax payer. The man is dying, the only real option would have been to remove him to an NHS Hospital and provide enormous security. His subsequent death would have fuelled the conspiracy theorists, particularly as there seems to be reason to believe him to have been innocent. Better to send him home to die in the full glare of the press spotlight. Good post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Posted August 23, 2009 Author Share Posted August 23, 2009 (edited) But the US has released terrorists too. One can't draw an exact parallel between the Al Megrahi case and Guantanamo Bay situations for several reasons. Megrahi was convicted in court whereas most of the Guantanamo cases are sort of POWs who have not been charged or tried. Also Libya's regime was left-wing extremist rather than radical islamist.But some prisoners have been released from Guantanamo Bay who have subsequently returned to Al Qaeda and anti-western activities. And it must be remembered that a lot of Americans supported IRA terrorism, as they had some sort of romantic notion about Irish roots, which turned out on further investigation to be protestant, or 'Scots-Irish' in many cases, including Bill Clinton, I believe! I think Clinton once remarked that he had the demeanor of an Irishman - to be fair, most of the Irish who migrated to the US were catholic. in 1790 there were 400,000 Americans of Irish birth or ancestry out of a total white population of 3,100,000. Roughly a 50% catholic/protestant split. As many as 4.5 million Irish arrived in America between 1820 and 1930. Mainly catholic. Not that the catholic / protestant thing matters that much anyway when it comes to republican violence - Irish republicanism has strong protestant roots - Wolfe Tone, Napper Tandy, Robert Emmet, etc., and has always had protestant supporters. Read this - father a Paisleyite - son a member of INLA. Very depressing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronnie_Bunting Edited August 23, 2009 by gruffydd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.