Peter Hun Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 On 31/03/2018 at 2:40 PM, jonb2 said: Russia and its allies Allies, who would that be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Hun Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 38 minutes ago, zugzwang said: UK govt scientists: No proof whatsoever Russia was behind the attempted murder. You can't even read your own post? It didn't say that. This is not a court of law. There is no court where Russia can be tried and no matter what Russia would ignore the result or veto a vote. We can decide to treat Russia as a pariah because of the pattern of criminal behaviour. The other countries did the same because of the same attacks coming from Russia. For instance, Latvia who had a border guard kidnapped within Latvia and taken to Russia and held as a Spy. Holland, whose citizens were murdered by the Russian Army in MH17. Or Ukraine, invaded by Russia, occupied and subjected to an ongoing terrorist campaign. Poland with a stream of Russian spies and threats of nuclear attack. Denmark who were directectly threatened with nuclear attack. Sweden and the other Baltics who have repeated airspace violations. The list goes on. And on. Don't care anymore, patience has run out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 3 hours ago, Errol said: This, of course, is sheer nonsense. I think 160+ nations in the world have refused to have anything to do with the US/Western actions. Of course, if by 'the world' you mean the US/West (which most in the US/West do actually consider as the world), then you are absolutely correct. Over four days to answer. Communications with the Kremlin, for instructions on a suitable response, must have been delayed over the Easter holiday . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 2 hours ago, Peter Hun said: You can't even read your own post? It didn't say that. This is not a court of law. There is no court where Russia can be tried and no matter what Russia would ignore the result or veto a vote. We can decide to treat Russia as a pariah because of the pattern of criminal behaviour. The other countries did the same because of the same attacks coming from Russia. For instance, Latvia who had a border guard kidnapped within Latvia and taken to Russia and held as a Spy. Holland, whose citizens were murdered by the Russian Army in MH17. Or Ukraine, invaded by Russia, occupied and subjected to an ongoing terrorist campaign. Poland with a stream of Russian spies and threats of nuclear attack. Denmark who were directectly threatened with nuclear attack. Sweden and the other Baltics who have repeated airspace violations. The list goes on. And on. Don't care anymore, patience has run out. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Craig Murray weighs in again: Johnson and May Hide as their Lies Dissolve https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/04/johnson-and-may-hide-as-their-lies-dissolve/ May should resign over this. Johnson should already have been fired for the outright nonsense he was spouting (ably demonstrating his total unsuitability for high office). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Top German CDU Politician Lambasts Britain for Lack of Evidence in Skripal Case Armin Laschet, head of the most populated German state, North Rhine-Westphalia, has criticized the actions of the UK and its foreign supporters in the Skripal poisoning case, reproaching the expulsion of diplomats without sound evidence. The deputy chair of Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Minister President of the most populous state of Germany, Armin Laschet, lashed out at the UK, commenting on the latest turn in the Skripal poisoning case. “If you force almost all NATO-countries to demonstrate solidarity, shouldn’t you have sound evidence? You can treat Russia as you like, but I have learned a different way of dealing with states, studying international law,” he posted on Twitter. https://sputniknews.com/europe/201804041063192459-skripal-novichok-poisoning-probe-diplomatic-row-russia-germany-uk-evidence/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zugzwang Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 14 hours ago, Peter Hun said: You can't even read your own post? It didn't say that. This is not a court of law. There is no court where Russia can be tried and no matter what Russia would ignore the result or veto a vote. We can decide to treat Russia as a pariah because of the pattern of criminal behaviour. The other countries did the same because of the same attacks coming from Russia. For instance, Latvia who had a border guard kidnapped within Latvia and taken to Russia and held as a Spy. Holland, whose citizens were murdered by the Russian Army in MH17. Or Ukraine, invaded by Russia, occupied and subjected to an ongoing terrorist campaign. Poland with a stream of Russian spies and threats of nuclear attack. Denmark who were directectly threatened with nuclear attack. Sweden and the other Baltics who have repeated airspace violations. The list goes on. And on. Don't care anymore, patience has run out. Sorry, you'll have to try harder. That's exactly what Porton Down is saying: there's no proof in the evidence they have examined of any Russian involvement whatsoever. But thanks to Craig Murray we knew in advance this would be the conclusion. The recipe for novichok has been in the public domain for twenty plus years, any number of state actors could have made the stuff or a close analog. In fact, any reasonably capable chemist could do so. And that's before we even consider the possibility that vestiges of the old Soviet/Ukrainian program are still floating around the black market. Skripal was something of a fantasist, for all we know he could have poisoned himself trying to acquire the stuff. Boris Johnson has told us the UK govt has evidence that the Putin regime has been manufacturing and stockpiling chemical weapons for the last ten years. If he does then we must see it, otherwise there is no case for Russia to answer. I, for one, am not hopeful. Johnson's already been caught lying outrageously when he claimed that an un-named Porton Down scientist was 'categorical' in his assurances about the Russian origins of the substance used in the Salisbury attack. Disgraceful but sadly not out of character. Johnson's serial fibs about Brexit have already established how unfit he is to hold the office of Foreign Secretary. https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/03/boris-johnson-a-categorical-liar/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Yawn........ Of course they can't prove it. As has been said many times on this thread, Putin would not do anything that could be proven in a court of law. He wants everyone to "know" it was him but not be able to prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Boris Johnson 'misled the public' over Porton Down novichok evidence, says Labour Diane Abbott, the shadow home secretary, has now explicitly accused Boris Johnson of misleading the public about the Porton Down novichok evidence. She implied as much in her Today interview, but she has now firmed up her language in a press release. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2018/apr/04/labour-criticises-boris-johnson-over-his-porton-downnovichok-claims-as-opcw-meets-politics-live Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Foreign Office deletes tweet saying Porton Down confirmed Salisbury novichok produced in Russia Tweet which has been removed/altered is below: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2018/apr/04/labour-criticises-boris-johnson-over-his-porton-downnovichok-claims-as-opcw-meets-politics-live Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Hun Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 2 hours ago, Bruce Banner said: Yawn........ Of course they can't prove it. As has been said many times on this thread, Putin would not do anything that could be proven in a court of law. He wants everyone to "know" it was him but not be able to prove it. The Russians boasted about this killing and claimed credit for previous murders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Once again, Boris Johnson is a liability to Britain. Why is he still in the job? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/04/boris-johnson-liability-porton-down-russia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Hun Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 2 hours ago, zugzwang said: If he does then we must see it, otherwise there is no case for Russia to answer. I, for one, am not hopeful. Lol. Case.... what court is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 The same one the US/British officials responsible for the war crimes of the Iraq war were tried in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 8 minutes ago, Errol said: The same one the US/British officials responsible for the war crimes of the Iraq war were tried in? Irrelevant mud slinging! UK and US crimes nave nothing to do with Putin's crimes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Hun Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Quote Russia must cooperate with chemical weapons watchdog, says EU Moscow told to provide full disclosure to investigation into Salisbury spy poisoning https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/04/chemical-weapons-watchdog-meets-russian-spy-poisoning-salisbury-sergei-skripal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Eagle Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 The backslash is starting, as I previously said Boris will lose his job over this: Quote Boris Johnson accused of misleading public by claiming scientists identified Russia for nerve agent poisoning Foreign Office under fire after deleting a tweet stating Porton Down had concluded the novichok used in the attack was 'produced in Russia' https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/salisbury-attack-boris-johnson-nerve-agent-russia-misleading-novichok-spy-poisoning-latest-a8288216.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 5 minutes ago, The Eagle said: The backslash is starting, as I previously said Boris will lose his job over this: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/salisbury-attack-boris-johnson-nerve-agent-russia-misleading-novichok-spy-poisoning-latest-a8288216.html Boris is a buffoon and deserves to lose his job...... but not over this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Boris is a useful Buffoon. They get him to say the outrageous, but if it goes wrong it is easily denied. 'Everybody knows what Boris is like.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zugzwang Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 3 hours ago, Byron said: Boris is a useful Buffoon. They get him to say the outrageous, but if it goes wrong it is easily denied. 'Everybody knows what Boris is like.' The only person who comes out of this entire affair with any credit is Jeremy Corbyn. His measured and thoughtful responses look positively Churchillian when compared with the presumptuous bluster of Johnson, the FCO, and the British media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Such "measured and thoughtful responses" play right into Putin's hands. Churchill would not have given Hitler the benefit of any doubt. Edit: It worked for Neville Chamberlain though, or did it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Hun Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 1 hour ago, zugzwang said: The only person who comes out of this entire affair with any credit is Jeremy Corbyn. His measured and thoughtful responses look positively Churchillian when compared with the presumptuous bluster of Johnson, the FCO, and the British media. I you consider snivelling traitor an admirable trait. Or you are a russian tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rollover Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Peter Hun said: I you consider snivelling traitor an admirable trait. Or you are a russian tool. Why are you accusing posters without any evidence? Please list your facts and evidence, to support your allegation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Jeremy Corbyn Invited two IRA members to parliament two weeks after the Brighton bombing. Attended Bloody Sunday commemoration with bomber Brendan McKenna. Attended meeting with Provisional IRA member Raymond McCartney. Hosted IRA linked Mitchell McLaughlin in parliament. Spoke alongside IRA terrorist Martina Anderson. Attended Sinn Fein dinner with IRA bomber Gerry Kelly. Chaired Irish republican event with IRA bomber Brendan MacFarlane. Attended Bobby Sands commemoration honouring IRA terrorists. Stood in minute’s silence for IRA gunmen shot dead by the SAS. Refused to condemn the IRA in Sky News interview. Refused to condemn the IRA on Question Time. Refused to condemn IRA violence in BBC radio interview. Signed EDM after IRA Poppy massacre massacre blaming Britain for the deaths. Arrested while protesting in support of Brighton bomber’s co-defendants. Lobbied government to improve visiting conditions for IRA killers. Attended Irish republican event calling for armed conflict against Britain. Hired suspected IRA man Ronan Bennett as a parliamentary assistant. Hired another aide closely linked to several convicted IRA terrorists. Heavily involved with IRA sympathising newspaper London Labour Briefing. Put up £20,000 bail money for IRA terror suspect Roisin McAliskey. Didn’t support IRA ceasefire. Said Hamas and Hezbollah are his “friends“. Called for Hamas to be removed from terror banned list. Called Hamas “serious and hard-working“. Attended wreath-laying at grave of Munich massacre terrorist. Attended conference with Hamas and PFLP. Photographed smiling with Hezbollah flag. Attended rally with Hezbollah and Al-Muhajiroun. Repeatedly shared platforms with PFLP plane hijacker. Hired aide who praised Hamas’ “spirit of resistance“. Accepted £20,000 for state TV channel of terror-sponsoring Iranian regime. Opposed banning Britons from travelling to Syria to fight for ISIS. Defended rights of fighters returning from Syria. Said ISIS supporters should not be prosecuted. Compared fighters returning from Syria to Nelson Mandela. Said the death of Osama Bin Laden was a “tragedy“. Wouldn’t sanction drone strike to kill ISIS leader. Voted to allow ISIS fighters to return from Syria. Opposed shoot to kill. Attended event organised by terrorist sympathising IHRC. Signed letter defending Lockerbie bombing suspects. Wrote letter in support of conman accused of fundraising for ISIS. Spoke of “friendship” with Mo Kozbar, who called for destruction of Israel. Attended event with Abdullah Djaballah, who called for holy war against UK. Called drone strikes against terrorists “obscene”. Boasted about “opposing anti-terror legislation”. Said laws banning jihadis from returning to Britain are “strange”. Accepted £5,000 donation from terror supporter Ted Honderich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rollover Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Byron said: Jeremy Corbyn Invited two IRA members to parliament two weeks after the Brighton bombing. Attended Bloody Sunday commemoration with bomber Brendan McKenna. Attended meeting with Provisional IRA member Raymond McCartney. Hosted IRA linked Mitchell McLaughlin in parliament. Spoke alongside IRA terrorist Martina Anderson. Attended Sinn Fein dinner with IRA bomber Gerry Kelly. Chaired Irish republican event with IRA bomber Brendan MacFarlane. Attended Bobby Sands commemoration honouring IRA terrorists. Stood in minute’s silence for IRA gunmen shot dead by the SAS. Refused to condemn the IRA in Sky News interview. Refused to condemn the IRA on Question Time. Refused to condemn IRA violence in BBC radio interview. Signed EDM after IRA Poppy massacre massacre blaming Britain for the deaths. Arrested while protesting in support of Brighton bomber’s co-defendants. Lobbied government to improve visiting conditions for IRA killers. Attended Irish republican event calling for armed conflict against Britain. Hired suspected IRA man Ronan Bennett as a parliamentary assistant. Hired another aide closely linked to several convicted IRA terrorists. Heavily involved with IRA sympathising newspaper London Labour Briefing. Put up £20,000 bail money for IRA terror suspect Roisin McAliskey. Didn’t support IRA ceasefire. Said Hamas and Hezbollah are his “friends“. Called for Hamas to be removed from terror banned list. Called Hamas “serious and hard-working“. Attended wreath-laying at grave of Munich massacre terrorist. Attended conference with Hamas and PFLP. Photographed smiling with Hezbollah flag. Attended rally with Hezbollah and Al-Muhajiroun. Repeatedly shared platforms with PFLP plane hijacker. Hired aide who praised Hamas’ “spirit of resistance“. Accepted £20,000 for state TV channel of terror-sponsoring Iranian regime. Opposed banning Britons from travelling to Syria to fight for ISIS. Defended rights of fighters returning from Syria. Said ISIS supporters should not be prosecuted. Compared fighters returning from Syria to Nelson Mandela. Said the death of Osama Bin Laden was a “tragedy“. Wouldn’t sanction drone strike to kill ISIS leader. Voted to allow ISIS fighters to return from Syria. Opposed shoot to kill. Attended event organised by terrorist sympathising IHRC. Signed letter defending Lockerbie bombing suspects. Wrote letter in support of conman accused of fundraising for ISIS. Spoke of “friendship” with Mo Kozbar, who called for destruction of Israel. Attended event with Abdullah Djaballah, who called for holy war against UK. Called drone strikes against terrorists “obscene”. Boasted about “opposing anti-terror legislation”. Said laws banning jihadis from returning to Britain are “strange”. Accepted £5,000 donation from terror supporter Ted Honderich. Theoretically, you are beating around the bush and on all counts evading the main issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.