50%deposit Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 When the internet was first born there was arush to manage your own server, then it changed to hosted servers because they take away the hassle. Now i am totally contemplating getting my own server. One in england, one in the US and on in some strange far away land, maybe Somalia..... Set up my own e-mail system. They cant force countries outside of the UK to obey British law. or get a server in a non english speaking country, like wales. the langauge barrier will keep them at bay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stu2006 Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 What is the point of tracking Internet usage when anyone in a cable area can go and buy a cloned modem for under 60 quid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pindar Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 That feckless whore really has no clue. What she also fails to mention is the fact that they already have ample powers to intercept *any* communication and they already do it. Does she really believe that criminals would be daft enough to discuss their plans on a public communications network? Stupid ****. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seydel Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I rejoice on hearing of measures such as this one. Only those with something to hide will have reservations. I look forward to the day when our terribly caring government insists on placing a CCTV camera in the corner of my living room for my own safety and security because I'm wary of some baddy with a beard down to his knees clutching a copy of the Koran breaking in when I'm down Tesco's buying non-Halal meat. It'll also prove invaluable should I ever trip over the hound when switching TV channels and bang my head as the nice person who's monitoring me will be able to call an ambulance a whole nanosecond before my wife would be able to. Hooray. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the anti krust Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) Haven't they got better things to do ffs ? Kunce. Edited April 27, 2009 by the anti krust Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alabala Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Communications firms are being asked to record all internet contacts between people as part of a modernisation in UK police surveillance tactics. The new system would track all e-mails, phone calls and internet use, including visits to social network sites.Announcing a consultation on a new strategy for communications data and its use in law enforcement, Jacqui Smith said there would be no single government-run database. But she also said that "doing nothing" in the face of a communications revolution was not an option. The Home Office will instead ask communications companies - from internet service providers to mobile phone networks - to extend the range of information they currently hold on their subscribers and organise it so that it can be better used by the police, MI5 and other public bodies investigating crime and terrorism. "Communications data is an essential tool for law enforcement agencies to track murderers, paedophiles, save lives and tackle crime," Ms Smith said. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8020039.stm Subject of the Queen, Smith can ask whatver she want...but what about encrypted chat, encryped mail clients, tunneling networks, entirely closed web and pear to pear encrypted networks... monitor hew wide platsdarm yes, monitor the danger on the net, well no...these who need protection and privacy know how to hide, the normal user is not treat to nationa security, browsing porn is not going to blow buildings...Labours are seriously hilarious on ths topic. TLS IPSec and new protocls are developed each year, Transparent end-to-end encryption, other type of protocols make the monitoring impossible...The ammount of computing power and software that government must use in order to track and monitor people with skills is just beyond their wide imagination...So this is just another story of telling people big brother is watching...yeah it is, porn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Professor Posted April 27, 2009 Author Share Posted April 27, 2009 pear to pear encrypted networks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
domo Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Great terrarists will all use royal mail and Gordon Brown will keep himself busy policing my porn addiction. :angry: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y-QUERK Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I hope I dont show up on thier radar, having downloaded over 789GB of porn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stu2006 Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I hope I dont show up on thier radar, having downloaded over 789GB of porn. and thats just off nakedsweatyfattiemilfs.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarahBell Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 icq, msn, twitter, facebook, myspace, bebo all the other chat protocols. google chat, google video chat. Unless they record every last word we say it's all just noise. Even if they recorded it all rather than just who talked all they'd know is that a lot of people communicate all day long. They aint got the money to keep up with the nation's surfing habits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XswampyX Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 and thats just off nakedsweatyfattiemilfs.com They blocked that one already. Just think of all that extra power that people will now have to use, encrypting & unencrypting everything. It just sums up this government using loads of energy and time to accomplish nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormymonday_2011 Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) It is actually a huge climb down by the Home Office and shows how the Governments dream of Omniscience based on control of all data is crumbling to dust as the reality of the implosion of tax yields begins to bite. The key words are that the government is announcing a consultation on a new strategy for communications data Anyone who has ever had any dealings with Whitehall knows this is the type of statement released when an existing policy has been axed and the Civil Service want to kick the whole matter into the long grass where it can be quietly forgotten. The reality was that the proposed database had precious little to do with National Security and was just a make work proposal for bureaucrats, consultants and the IT companies that have been bleeding the tax payer white for the best part of the last decade. It wont make much difference to the operation of the intelligence services who have always had means of accessing this data when required and already have their own systems for monitoring communications. Edited April 27, 2009 by up2nogood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarahBell Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 And isn't a huge % of email spam - they're going to be monitoring an awful lot of that rubbish too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crispindry Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 And isn't a huge % of email spam - they're going to be monitoring an awful lot of that rubbish too. Most of it from here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whojamaflip Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 And isn't a huge % of email spam - they're going to be monitoring an awful lot of that rubbish too. something like 70%. and porn p2p is 50% of all traffik. i blame the government Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) The reason BT shares are cheaper then 20 years ago is because the goverment wants to take it over so it controls all the wires. i'm going to go for one of the VPN connection so my ISP can not read jack $hit and before we get the nothing to hide reverse logic argument then where is open goverment that is bring out new laws by the day to try and hide information from the public. Feel free to share all your emails with the world whilst i move towards protecting the privacy of what i say and people say to me and make no mistake protecting information will become just as big as tax avoidance with all it's account specialists it's just people have not realised how much they will need them yet. hello GCHQ, semtex bomb manufactures and kill i hope you are reading this and lets talk about your pensions you won't be getting hope this is here in ten years time to remind you all. They aint got the money to keep up with the nation's surfing habits well yes they have it's your money but i don't think they asked you if this was how they should spend the money they force out of you each taxing day. turn technoligy against those that whish us harmy like in the ian tomlnson case we all forgoton about becuase the Beeb forgot to remind us all once a day. Edited April 27, 2009 by Justice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImA20SomethingGetMeOutOfHere Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) Death to America incest donkey show bomb making tips and cocaine in my area Go to about 3:20. Edit: Nearly Forgot: Semtex Bin Laden Death to Gordon Brown Anthrax Banking is Fraud Weapons of Mass Destruction Plutonium AK47 Edited April 27, 2009 by ImA20SomethingGetMeOutOfHere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Great terrarists will all use royal mail and Gordon Brown will keep himself busy policing my porn addiction. :angry: shame the MP's don't do the same as it would save tax payers money as them cheeky ba$tards even dare claim that as a tax allowance and god knows how many hookers we are keeping in buishness from our taxes. many people that have a thing about power also have a problom when it comes to sex keep the right hand strong i say Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VacantPossession Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) This amounts to what Orwell predicted in 1984. The people who need monitoring are our MP's and police. Who kicks the crap out of peaceful demonstrators ? Who starts wars that kill hundreds of thousands on deliberately false intel ? Is it the average Joe at home, or those who now seek yet more powers ? Jack Boot Smith has lost the plot. I'd like to see CCTV in the house of commons bars. How about monitoring links between the police, big business and common purpose ? What about a proper debate on how we went to war wasting billions looking for WMD's that the Govt were told didn't exist ? How about telling us the truth about David Kelly's death ? This appears to be another NWO mandate which we can ill afford. The elite want complete control - and a free internet is a threat. I see Harperson is also at it with an unenforceable piece of legislation on removing class discrimination. The lunatics are at the helm as the titanic steams on towards the iceberg of state bankruptcy. This is one of the most succinct and intelligent posts I have seen here in several years. What JS doesn't seem to realise is that there is an enormous distinction between nice old ladies and gentleman who thoroughly hate everything she stands for, and want to express that opinion legally, peacefully and vigorously, and some other person who wants to kill people because they think that is the only way. Our corrupt, greedy, expense fiddling Home Secretary lumps them all in to one category. Consequently, even the most bland objector is increasingly appearing on government radar as a "terrorist" yet all they are doing is peacefully expressing an assumed right. This confusion between a real terrorist, so called, and a perfectly legitimate expression of disapproval is becoming so blurred that it is now a virtual certainty that anyone objecting to anything, in whatever way, is now a target for surveillance, dirty tricks, arrest and intimidation. This is an utterly disgraceful abuse of the very principles upon which this government came to power. Moreover, this lack of discernment on the part of JS and other ministers and officials renders the whole system of policing, justice and law a complete lottery according to the next knee jerk reaction of a government which cannot make an intelligent assessment of the difference between democracy and its abuse. We now have ever more desperate police raids and actions which seek to establish that there is a palpable "threat" to the nation. I don't believe a word of it, and it is very interesting to see that the latest "raid" has in fact ended in farce. Now, if there were really people just about to blow up an airliner, or town, or village, I would be the first to support any action to stop it. But the home office and police have cried wolf now so many times that I have become cynical about any claimed operation of this kind. Furthermore, I find it extraordinary, as a brief example, that a few palpably peaceful protestors against a south coast arms producer have been hassled beyond belief by the police, who turned up with cameras to film them as though they were potential terrorists. Quite naturally the protestors thought they would return the favour and film the police filming them. Guess who won? Arrested, most of them. Then subsequently we find the police are "tipping off" said arms manufacturer, which is a consitutionally illegal act and immediately identifies the police as prime facie supporters of the arms trade. This is absolutely appalling, but what it also serves to achieve is an increasing alienation with authority, because individual people within that authority are not only deeply flawed, like the rest of us, but they seriously think they can gain respect through abuse of their expenses, powers and influence, yet still imagine we are going to roll over and let them defecate on us from a great height. They are living a fantasy that only arrives through a period far too long in office. Edited April 27, 2009 by VacantPossession Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futurepaul Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 It doesn't really matter the internet is going to crash next year according to the Times http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/ne...icle6169488.ece Almost forgot Gordon Brown Eye Rampant Rabbit Faslane Selafield Bomb Hate Infidel Iran Clacton AK47 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny5thumbs Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I hope I dont show up on thier radar, having downloaded over 789GB of porn. low-res eh ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny5thumbs Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Go to about 3:20. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simpleton Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Allah jihad infidel bush obama pentagon new york iraq afghanistan pakistan iran smuggle ricin brown balls mandelson london 2012 terror plot explode plane bus tube train kuffir chinawhites blair kill murder bluewater bullring wembley hidden liquid powder anthrax postage guantanamo osama taleban Al-Qaeda extremist sunni mosque plan code heroin guns money And I would just like to add.... DEATH TO ALL WESTERNERS - HOLY JIHAD!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simpleton Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 And I would just like to add....DEATH TO ALL WESTERNERS - HOLY JIHAD!!!!!!!!!!!!! Actually, just had an idea. All we'd (i.e anyone who didn't want to sign up to a terrifying vision of an Orwellian surveillance Police State) need to do, surely, is send 3 or 4 e-mails per day full of "filter" words SECRET WEAPONS STASH CRUSH THE INFIDELS etc etc?? Wouldn't that pretty much balls the whole thing up for them, assuming sufficient numbers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.