Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Gov to announce Stamp Duty Cut for first time buyers


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445

What is a first time buyer? What if you bought a place in your twenties, got divorced for argument sake......rented for 20 years then decides to buy in 50s.....how would anyone know if they owned 20 years ago? Not a first time buyer.

Anyway all for it, buying a first home means buying furniture and other items/decoration to create a home, what would have been paid out in SD comes back in VAT.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446

Completely agree with kilham. They know house prices are causing a problem, but at the same time dont want a dramatic fall. The current zero percent level is 125 grand. Doesnt sound a lot but that is  over 4 times the average income. In a normal society 4 to 5 times average income would buy a first time buyer somewhere decent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
35 minutes ago, winkie said:

What is a first time buyer? What if you bought a place in your twenties, got divorced for argument sake......rented for 20 years then decides to buy in 50s.....how would anyone know if they owned 20 years ago? Not a first time buyer.

Anyway all for it, buying a first home means buying furniture and other items/decoration to create a home, what would have been paid out in SD comes back in VAT.;)

If you have bought in the past then you're not a first time buyer.  I'd be surprised if they can't/don't check the land registry for previous purchases.

 

You might be lucky - if the records don't go back far enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
9 minutes ago, Just_Do_It said:

If you have bought in the past then you're not a first time buyer.  I'd be surprised if they can't/don't check the land registry for previous purchases.

 

You might be lucky - if the records don't go back far enough.

Can they check to see if already own one anyway?;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
18 minutes ago, winkie said:

...I'd be surprised if they can't/don't check the land registry for previous purchases.

I bet no one checks anything like that. Na, no way. Ask yourself, who would benefit by doing so?

FTB = not having a mortgage in the last 6 months. ie. anyone with a pulse.
The image that "First Time Buyer" conjures up in the general publics' ill-informed mind bares no connection with actual reality but makes a great heart warming headline.

 

More HPI props comming soon, sadly many on HPC will be very disappointed.

Edited by DarkHorseWaits-NoMore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414
14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416

I just know that I'll be in a really bad mood for the rest of the week once the idiot Hammond has announced his stupid ideas, that will keep house prices up. Ideas that don't help anyone in society other than the Rentier class and he knows it. The only saving grace is the Tories are going to wiped off the face of the earth at the next election, I'm only hoping that's not in 4 and a bit years time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421

BTL has been touted by Osborne, Carney etc for quite a while now as a real and present threat to the stability of the economy and the wider banking system... by 'helping out' FTBs they will in fact be enabling overextended members of the BTL market to bail out with a soft landing - ultimately reducing risk for all parties. Two birds - one stone. Annoyingly it makes sense.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Mapatasy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
2 minutes ago, Mapatasy said:

BTL has been touted by Osborne, Carney etc for quite a while now as a real and present threat to the stability of the economy and the wider banking system... by 'helping out' FTBs they will in fact be enabling overextended members of BTL to bail out - ultimately reducing risk. Two birds - one stone. Annoyingly it makes sense.

It is more stimulus to the demand side, which isn't what we need.

However, it might help them buy some young votes from people who don't realise they're being played and also move the figures back toward more OOs a little so they can claim they're doing the right thing. Since the UK economy largely relies on high house prices, it makes sense to the government but it's still not the right policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
Just now, dugsbody said:

It is more stimulus to the demand side, which isn't what we need.

However, it might help them buy some young votes from people who don't realise they're being played and also move the figures back toward more OOs a little so they can claim they're doing the right thing. Since the UK economy largely relies on high house prices, it makes sense to the government but it's still not the right policy.

Agreed... it's absolutely the wrong thing to be doing but time has proven that stability within the banking sector is the only importance. Bank stress test results out on the 28th!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
24
HOLA4425

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information