Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Labours HARD left demand their pound of flesh


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
7 minutes ago, Insane said:

Yes and the Rich are more likely to go elsewhere so we then get nothing from them. 

The Friends of Boris Johnson are richer than ever. Most of that wealth is concentrated in property - the one thing they assuredly can't take with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 273
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442
14 minutes ago, markyh said:

We all know it will be lowered, £2m , then £1m , then they will just never raise it ands let "Fiscal Drag" do it's work.   £1m out family would instantly be in it ,  £2m could come around soon enough, £3m is not out of the question within the next 20-30 years. 

All this will do is cause a huge upsurge of Trusts for assets over £3m.  I don't own it, the Trust does. 

So just leave the country. When you’re so rich, it makes no difference where you live.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
1 minute ago, zugzwang said:

You introduce wealth taxes to disincentivise property hoarding, feudal inheritance and financial speculation. You create a free market - free from economic rents and private monopolies - with employment rights and environmental protections enshrined at its heart. You prioritise investment and manufacturing over borrowing and consumption. You stop admitting coolie labour by the plane-load and establish a nationwide program of general needs social housing to fix the acute demand pressure in the private rental sector and restore the historical link between earnings and mortgage affordability.

 

You can do most of that with a land value tax and sack tax collectors and save money on work and buildings.

For me if a guy pisses his salary away on drugs and hookers or saves it prudently does not offend me when its the latter.

A land value tax is an efficiency and a tax.. the best kind of tax and it also addresses the elephant in the room.... foreign hot money flows into our property market.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
2 minutes ago, zugzwang said:

You introduce wealth taxes to disincentivise property hoarding, feudal inheritance and financial speculation. You create a free market - free from economic rents and private monopolies - with employment rights and environmental protections enshrined at its heart. You prioritise investment and manufacturing over borrowing and consumption. You stop admitting coolie labour by the plane-load and establish a nationwide program of general needs social housing to fix the acute demand pressure in the private rental sector and restore the historical link between earnings and mortgage affordability.

But this is the reason why I don't think we will ever get there. 

You say  " You stop admitting coolie labour by the plane-load" 

The people like Mrs Doyle proposing this more productive happy society are pro mass immigration at any cost anyone not agreeing with them is a Racist and therefore the infighting on this subject will ensure that they don't move forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
1 minute ago, Fromage Frais said:

You can do most of that with a land value tax and sack tax collectors and save money on work and buildings.

For me if a guy pisses his salary away on drugs and hookers or saves it prudently does not offend me when its the latter.

A land value tax is an efficiency and a tax.. the best kind of tax and it also addresses the elephant in the room.... foreign hot money flows into our property market.
 

A land value tax would be the first thing I'd introduce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
15 minutes ago, Insane said:

I think we have now reached a point where those taking out are equal to those in the middle paying in. There is little or no difference between them. So we get to the point where those in the middle are better off joining those taking out.

Gordon Brown began this push in earnest, with his goal being for most people to be in receipt of some form of Govt "benefit", such that they come to view themselves as dependent upon the state and thus be afraid of voting for anyone who challenges that benefits-dependency model.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
1 minute ago, PeanutButter said:

So just leave the country. When you’re so rich, it makes no difference where you live.

 

3 million at 5/6% 180k. year.

As rates rise anyone without kids or kids that are old enough will discover there is a big world out there.

Will everyone go.... no

But xx% might consider it and thats enough to cause real damage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
5 minutes ago, zugzwang said:

The Friends of Boris Johnson are richer than ever. Most of that wealth is concentrated in property - the one thing they assuredly can't take with them.

Many Friends of Boris Johnson are still here but will have business interests domiciled elsewhere. How do you know most of their wealth is concentrated in property? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
2 minutes ago, Beef Shandy said:

Gordon Brown began this push in earnest, with his goal being for most people to be in receipt of some form of Govt "benefit", such that they come to view themselves as dependent upon the state and thus be afraid of voting for anyone who challenges that benefits-dependency model.

In work tax credits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
Just now, Insane said:

Many Friends of Boris Johnson are still here but will have business interests domiciled elsewhere. How do you know most of their wealth is concentrated in property? 

 

The UK stock market has done nothing for 25 years while residential and commercial property prices have gone parabolic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
10 minutes ago, PeanutButter said:

So just leave the country. When you’re so rich, it makes no difference where you live.

 

That is what they are shit scared people will do, remove their accumulated wealth from the country or not bring new money into the country.....everything is all about the money honey......the wealthy have choices, the poor tax them, they won't notice so much, and can't do much about it.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
8 minutes ago, PeanutButter said:

So just leave the country. When you’re so rich, it makes no difference where you live.

 

It will be assets that drag most people in , and assets are illiquid and not cash.  There will be millions of families in the UK who have lots of wealth in assets but not cash to pay higher and higher asset taxes. We are back to the Granny in the £3m house on state pension who is forced to sell her house to pay the evil labour wealth tax. 

I would choose living Trusts and Crypto to keep excess wealth away for HMRC via Labour. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
Just now, zugzwang said:

The UK stock market has done nothing for 25 years while residential and commercial property prices have gone parabolic.

The dividends on the FTSE 100 have been quite good 5/6% compounded is nothing to sniff at. People still make money by trading shares the base price does not need to keep moving up for rich traders to earn. They can earn on movement up or down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
13 minutes ago, 17 Year Veteran said:

"Everything else, including family homes, cars, jewellery, artworks, cash in the bank and investments in stocks and shares would be on the table."

 

Sounds like a boom time for valuers of illiquid assets.

Good luck with that.

 

Their idea is to focus on producing an ever smaller pie, for the chiefs to divvy out a chunk of that shrinking pie to the wasters who vote them in, and then hope to keep the farce going for long enough that the chiefs get to live like kings for a while until the whole thing collapses when reality inevitably imposes itself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418

I really can't see anything wrong with such a policy... I'm sure the rich can afford it (and if they can't then they shouldn't pay the tax). That said, far better to do this via higher income taxes for higher earners, which was normal not that long ago. 

The spivs owe their fair share - it's as simple as that... and in Britain's economy it tends to be spivs who get rich... not from their own labour but via speculation. 
 

Edited by Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
1 minute ago, Insane said:

The dividends on the FTSE 100 have been quite good 5/6% compounded is nothing to sniff at. People still make money by trading shares the base price does not need to keep moving up for rich traders to earn. They can earn on movement up or down. 

There's £8 trillion of notional worth in the housing market but we'll also impose a Tobin tax on financial speculation to hit the City swillers directly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
13 minutes ago, anonguest said:

Define 'feudal inheritance' please.  How does it differ from plain ordinary 'inheritance'?

 

The principle of inheritance is feudal. 19th century free market economists were viscerally opposed to it - unlike their neoliberal counterparts today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
12 minutes ago, zugzwang said:

The principle of inheritance is feudal. 19th century free market economists were viscerally opposed to it - unlike their neoliberal counterparts today.

Really? Enlighten me further with some links please to back up that claim.

In any case, even if true.... so what?!  Are you saying we should shape our world according to the mindset of people who lived 200 years ago?! 

Edited by anonguest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
10 minutes ago, zugzwang said:

The principle of inheritance is feudal. 19th century free market economists were viscerally opposed to it - unlike their neoliberal counterparts today.

The concept/acceptance of the idea of being able to pass on worldly goods/property to next of kin or those chosen goes wayyyyy further back than medieval times

Inheritance - Wikipedia

I'm betting, as I've said many times before from your long posting history, that you are not married and don't have children.

Edited by anonguest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
50 minutes ago, Insane said:

I think we have now reached a point where those taking out are equal to those in the middle paying in. There is little or no difference between them. So we get to the point where those in the middle are better off joining those taking out. 

Yes at some point it has to collapse. No different to someone living well beyond their means on Credit going bankrupt.  

I know, let's just make shit up and present it as fact! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
Just now, anonguest said:

Really? Enlighten me further with some links.

In any case, even if true, so what?!  Are you saying we should shape our world according to the mindset of people who lived 200 years ago?!

Are you serious? Those people include Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, David Ricardo and Jean-Baptiste Say. They and others (including Karl Marx, who gave them their collective title) were instrumental in encouraging the political and social transformation of Europe from monarchy to democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425
34 minutes ago, Fromage Frais said:

3 million at 5/6% 180k. year.

As rates rise anyone without kids or kids that are old enough will discover there is a big world out there.

Will everyone go.... no

But xx% might consider it and thats enough to cause real damage

You think the super rich spend their money here? 

They hoard it,offshore it, and pay people so they can pay the least tax possible and not always legally. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information