Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Page 3


MrPin

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1
HOLA442

Is it still acceptable to look at cow's udders?

Or look at a piano's legs?

Seems to me the feminists want to go back to Victorian style prudery. I'm still trying to get my logic circuits around the set {bare t1ts for slut walk:no bare t1ts for P3 in case men look}.

It hurts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446

All a bit pointless really. You have some lass who is happy displaying her breasts for a few quid while blokes are happy paying a few pence to look. No different to Victorian What the Butler Saws. It always was a slightly incongruous thing to include in a daily newspaper though, and possibly did limit their readership (the Mail managed to appeal to women much better with its mix of gossip, borderline porn and general quixotic mix of hatred towards women in general v worship of a few impossible to achieve types).

The Sun is actually a very cleverly written newspaper that really understands its audience, and it'll be great to be able to read it in polite company without someone tutting about page 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447

I think it is funny though how the anti Page 3 lot have been appearing on the media today saying that the battle is not over - couldn't help thinking that they are miffed as they no longer have Page 3 to be angry at.

Apparently they are now moving on top stopping photos of women in bikinis or underwear appearing in papers and magazines.... so that won't just be the tabloids then but also the broadsheets? Is it Page3 they hated or just the tabloids?

They are sounding more and more like ISIS with all their censorship demands aren't they?

exploiting womens natural beauty is offensive...apparently...not sure which bit, the beauty or the exploiting of it to attract views.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412

Still big business in some parts of the world ...

Meanwhile_in_a_Japanese_factory_Img01.jp

I think they have been fooled! They look like fake tits to me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414
14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416

They can take away page three if they choose to.

But they'll never erase the holy trinity - Lusardi, Whittaker and Fox - from XYY's personal "wånk-bank"...

XYY

Linda Lusardi, was a bit of an angel! The other ones were little bits of an angel! :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421

Linda Lusardi, was a bit of an angel! The other ones were little bits of an angel! :blink:

It's like those daft Whovians though Pinny - when they prattle on about *their* Doctor.

You're a wee bit older than me, so Lusardi was probably at the back end (ooh er missus!) of your formative wänking-years - your top three probably includes Jilly Johnson...!

;)

(A fine-looking wench make no mistake, and still *active* to this day...!)

XYY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422

It's like those daft Whovians though Pinny - when they prattle on about *their* Doctor.

You're a wee bit older than me, so Lusardi was probably at the back end (ooh er missus!) of your formative wänking-years - your top three probably includes Jilly Johnson...!

;)!

I just checked out "Jilly Johnson" on Wiki! Even I am younger than her! She was a sweetie though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
23
HOLA4424
24
HOLA4425

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information