savetheclaypigeon Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 "BUT EMOTIONALLY I DON'T ALWAYS FEEL LIKE AN APPLE"... Yep that's right love. That's why our Grandfathers lay bleeding in trenchs love, to satisfy your emotional needs... It's tornado bait like this mutant that make me delighted I don't pay income tax! :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nugsson Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 'I only want an extra £100 a month, that's all', says Laura. Fück OFF!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry AKA Pod Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 I refuse to believe this could be true. Daily Mail rubbish blah blah blah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DisposableHeroes Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 'i Can't Afford To Eat Healthily' Says £600-a-month Benefits Woman Who Weighs 22 Stone, Sob story of the day You've made a spelling mistake in your title. I think your missing an l. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Fück OFF!!! +1 (loving the Umlaut) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
interestrateripoff Posted July 28, 2009 Author Share Posted July 28, 2009 I refuse to believe this could be true. Daily Mail rubbish blah blah blah There's always one who wishes to spoil it. I bet you where like this at school weren't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 am I being tremendously insensitive by suggesting that if instead of getting benefits, she simply got access to a soup kitchen, she'd be thinner and wouldn't have needed the expensive operation? am I a 19th C biggot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cells Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Labours gift to society. I remember when I was a kid some families that were on benefits. What I distinctly remember was that they were quite poor. Todays benefit families seem to be quite well off and in some cases better than those that work full time! Benefits should really be a big government warehouse with beds and a soup kitchen. That would cut the cost by about £100B enough to scrap VAT. It would also make rent a lot cheaper and hence working poor would be considerably better off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cells Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 am I being tremendously insensitive by suggesting that if instead of getting benefits, she simply got access to a soup kitchen, she'd be thinner and wouldn't have needed the expensive operation?am I a 19th C biggot? In her case it is clear cut that you could slash benefits but what of the case of single mothers with kids? You cant cut the benefits as the kids suffer. The alternative is to take the kids away but that would probably cost even more than letting the mother have benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 You cant cut the benefits as the kids suffer. The alternative is to take the kids away but that would probably cost even more than letting the mother have benefits. indeed, the dilemma... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarahBell Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 In her case it is clear cut that you could slash benefits but what of the case of single mothers with kids?You cant cut the benefits as the kids suffer. The alternative is to take the kids away but that would probably cost even more than letting the mother have benefits. fat parents have fat kids unemployed parents have unemployed kids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worzel Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 When is some political party going to get to grips with the benefit culture, its beyond a joke now Since they cant their own house in order on benefits, I would not hold my breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NuBrit Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 This article has to be a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Sadman Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 I find it interesting she is considered depressed. Those on incapacity/disability have gone up six fold in the last 25 years. I dont see x6 the amount of people in wheelchairs, thats for sure, so can only assume that most of the change is accounted for alcoholics and the 'depressed' Im sure most of us have been told we're depressed by our quacks at some point, or known someone in our lives termed 'clinically' depressed. Seems to me this depression is exacerbated by sitting alone at home. In this case scoffing all day long. If they had busy working lives they wouldnt have time to be depressed. Like i said, the welfare state sponsors this depravity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Put her down. Honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bateman Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 This article has made my day - I knew this would be giving the posters here an embolism. It really is the perfect Daily Mail article that works on so many different levels - must be the editors wet dream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 This article has made my day - I knew this would be giving the posters here an embolism. It really is the perfect Daily Mail article that works on so many different levels - must be the editors wet dream Is your avatar her 'before' picture ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhail Liebenstein Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 I dont blame her. If people want to feed themselves to death, thats up to them. Its the satanic welfare state that facilitates this depravity. Yes and the easiest way for her to lose weight is to lose benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bateman Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Is your avatar her 'before' picture ? And judging from the article it will soon be the 'after' picture as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agentimmo Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 In her case it is clear cut that you could slash benefits but what of the case of single mothers with kids?You cant cut the benefits as the kids suffer. The alternative is to take the kids away but that would probably cost even more than letting the mother have benefits. Like they do here in France. No qualms in doing this should the kids be in any danger of suffering. Plenty of foster families to take care of them. And surprisingly, you don't get as many sob stories like that one in the Daily Mail. (They exist, but just in far less numbers. And the French govt wouldn't be giving her all those benefits.............) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okaycuckoo Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Simpsons episode from 1995. Homer took time off from work because of obesity-disability and had to dress in a muumuu. When he finally collapsed under his own weight he couldn't call 911 because his fat fingers kept mashing the telephone keypad. Her hide would make tasty crackling for the hungry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacGuffin Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Her hide would make tasty crackling for the hungry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erranta Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 fat parents have fat kidsunemployed parents have unemployed kids Add the Wealthy/Bankers think up better schemes to rob the "Lower" Classes and keep them in their place - mostly under the pretext that it's "good" for you! ie if you don't give the farmers millions in subsidies through Defra - food prices will go up. Well they have anyway! It's the multiple 1000's acres owned by 'hidden' companies and the super rich who get most of these subsidies - mostly for doing bugga all. The woman should be forced to eat cabbage soup specially prepared by . . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moley Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 Add the Wealthy/Bankers think up better schemes to rob the "Lower" Classes and keep them in their place - mostly under the pretext that it's "good" for you!ie if you don't give the farmers millions in subsidies through Defra - food prices will go up. Well they have anyway! It's the multiple 1000's acres owned by 'hidden' companies and the super rich who get most of these subsidies - mostly for doing bugga all. The woman should be forced to eat cabbage soup specially prepared by . . . . Who? Who? Tell me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warwick-Watcher Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 Yes and the easiest way for her to lose weight is to lose benefits. No, I say let her eat until she explodes like Mr Creosote! That way we save her pension costs and probably 20-30 years of benefits before then TSB Virgil (There She Blows!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.