Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Converstaions with BTLs


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446
6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
2 minutes ago, happyguy said:

if she is getting say £1000 a month and has no mortgage the costs will not be anywhere near that so it makes sense to keep it and keep an income coming in 

Only if nothing else gives a better return (no idea if that is true or not).

 

23 minutes ago, Si1 said:

It doesn't surprise me. In their world there are only bank accounts and houses. The stock market is witchcraft.

Is she a teacher?

No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
48 minutes ago, iamnumerate said:

I tried to persuade a friend who has a flat she lets out (No mortgage) to sell it, her attitude was "But what would I do with the money?"

She is still a landlord, anyone else have similar conversations?

 

Even if the big property crash never happens, at the very least property has hit top and is unlikely to rise in the next decade, maybe longer. She has done OK, so maybe it's time to be prepared for the next big thing, I have a few ideas ?

But she could end up being one of many who end up boring everyone with their tale of their property was once worth £300,000 and now it is back to £150,000, which I personallly will take great joy in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414
3 minutes ago, Locke said:

Well, it basically is. Strategies which result in good gains will also get you seriously burned in the events of last few (and upcoming) days

 

Except for plain old fashioned balanced portfolios, low costs and buy and hold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
16
HOLA4417
17
HOLA4418

One of the purported benefits of capitalism is that it allocates resources efficiently by rewarding those people best able to allocate resources with more resources to allocate. 

The entire BTL debacle has been based upon allocating resources to those least able to invest them effectively.  

It’s no surprise that these people don’t know anything about investment, the surprise is that they got the capital in the first place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
1 minute ago, BorrowToLeech said:

One of the purported benefits of capitalism is that it allocates resources efficiently by rewarding those people best able to allocate resources with more resources to allocate.

It does. The problem is, we do not have capitalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421
4 minutes ago, longgone said:

many won`t go near it. including me.  

lots of risk for not much return. 

The trouble is that doesn't bear quantitative analysis. Long term stock market returns have been excellent, and have the advantage of being more liquid then houses.

The difficult bit is of course to actually get your fair share of those returns.

Edited by Si1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
1 minute ago, longgone said:

many won`t go near it. including me.  

lots of risk for not much return. 

It isn’t supposed to be that way. That’s the casino, winner takes all, economy in action. It shouldn’t be a gamble to invest in sound companies producing solid products. When the market is responding mostly to political and central bank intervention, and rent seeking makes business a zero-sum game, everything becomes risky. Setting up home is a huge financial risk, starting a burger stand is a huge financial risk, going to university...and so on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
3 minutes ago, Locke said:

It does. The problem is, we do not have capitalism.

We do. This is capitalism, everything else is a fantasy. 

You can’t say, oh I love the films of Adam Sandler, not the actual films of Adam Sandler, but the films I want Adam Sandler to make. Those are epic. 

Edited by BorrowToLeech
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
24
HOLA4425
1 minute ago, BorrowToLeech said:

It isn’t supposed to be that way. That’s the casino, winner takes all, economy in action. It shouldn’t be a gamble to invest in sound companies producing solid products. When the market is responding mostly to political and central bank intervention, and rent seeking makes business a zero-sum game, everything becomes risky. Setting up home is a huge financial risk, starting a burger stand is a huge financial risk, going to university...and so on. 

for who ?  to me the stock market is just an instrument that the idle rich use to make money constantly with the plebs trying to understand how it fits together. when you have billions of pounds yes you can make big returns from even 1% uplifts, for the little guys whats the point. 

 

5 minutes ago, Si1 said:

The trouble is that doesn't bear quantitative analysis. Long term stock market returns have been excellent, and have the advantage of being more liquid then houses.

The difficult bit is of course to actually get your fair share of those returns.

depends if you have the appetite to spend years analyzing, i like instant gratification. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information