inflating Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Or does he now present CIN for free now like afaik everybody else? He was on about a grand an hour in 2007. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-439875/Wogan-celeb-paid-Children-In-Need.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Monk Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inflating Posted November 18, 2011 Author Share Posted November 18, 2011 Any TOGGs here know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@contradevian Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 I'd pay for him to stop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pl1 Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 What %age of my £ will go to Children? Anyone know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inflating Posted November 18, 2011 Author Share Posted November 18, 2011 I'd pay for him to stop! +1 What %age of my £ will go to Children? Anyone know? Apparently "every penny". I assume salaries including any appearance fees are paid by out of the BBC Tax (Licence Fee) However, if I were a multi-millionaire receiving an appearance fee for being on CIN, I would donate it to CIN. In fact I'd donate it even if I were an entertainer on an average income Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lulu Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 +1 Apparently "every penny". I assume salaries including any appearance fees are paid by out of the BBC Tax (Licence Fee) However, if I were a multi-millionaire receiving an appearance fee for being on CIN, I would donate it to CIN. In fact I'd donate it even if I were an entertainer on an average income I would like to think that 'Sir' Terry was man enough to work for either no fee or if the BBC insist on paying that he donates the full amount. For man in his position to accept a fee for a charitable appearance would be very dissapointing. (same with most of the 'celebrities' though I am sure some should maybe get expenses so they are not out of pocket). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
interestrateripoff Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 http://www.bbc.co.uk/pudsey/fundraising/faq.shtml#29 Did Terry Wogan receive a fee for presenting the BBC Children in Need Appeal?BBC Children in Need, the charity, has never paid a fee to Terry Wogan. In the past, his presenting fee for the Appeal Show has come out of the BBC's programming budget, and not charity funds, because it was a TV production cost. However, Terry has said that he never sought a fee for presenting BBC Children in Need and he made sure that he did not get one in 2007. Since the first telethon in 1980 Sir Terry has been very involved with BBC Children in Need behind the scenes - both as a high-profile ambassador and more recently as a Trustee. He makes regular, unpaid, appearances on behalf of the charity and, as a member of the board of Trustees, he is also directly involved in setting our strategy and in allocating funds to projects that aim to change children's lives. We are very grateful for his unfailing commitment and popularity which play a vital role in our fundraising efforts. This is what the website has to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedDweller Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 I got paid for children in need .. the "Deal" is that the BBC pays for the production cost for the whole shebang, all the technicians .. studios etc .. and all the money goes directly to charities .. In fact in this case Charity work is better paid than many commercial jobs. Comic relief is different .. as I understand it the live crew are paid standard rates by the BBC but the crew for the filmed inserts are usually asked to do a pretty serious deal .. The last time I did CR my daily rate was £386 and I was asked to do the job for £100 (which I did for various reasons, none of them charitable) .. Children in Need just paid my fee .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Masked Tulip Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 I loathe children who appear on TV who have gone to stage schools! Loathe the feckers with their exaggerated movements and mannerisms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inflating Posted November 19, 2011 Author Share Posted November 19, 2011 In the past, his presenting fee for the Appeal Show has come out of the BBC's programming budget, and not charity funds, because it was a TV production cost. However, Terry has said that he never sought a fee for presenting BBC Children in Need and he made sure that he did not get one in 2007. Is this saying he was paid in the past, from whatever purse, but after the Daily Mail highlighted fees in 2007 he handed it back and has not charged a fee since? I sincerely hope that if he gets a fee he donates it to CIN - £8K would make quite a difference Locally to me, large and small shops took part. An indepedent toy shop sold cakes outside on tables (am surprised H&S didn't shut them down, the way red tape is these days) and a usually rough pub did a talent night in aid of CIN. Asda raised about £11K, but the others of course much less. I do really hope "every penny" does go where it should Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Hovis Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 Apparently "every penny". I assume salaries including any appearance fees are paid by out of the BBC Tax (Licence Fee) However, if I were a multi-millionaire receiving an appearance fee for being on CIN, I would donate it to CIN. In fact I'd donate it even if I were an entertainer on an average income AFAIK it is every penny donated but NOT every penny earned in interest while it sits on deposit; the BBC keep that. Terry Wogan is a superb presenter, he even stormed an episode of Buzzcoocks where I expected him to be slightly out of place. It will be a great shame when he retires; I don't bother with Eurovision now, for me it was only ever the Terry Wogan jokefest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winkie Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 I loathe children who appear on TV who have gone to stage schools! Loathe the feckers with their exaggerated movements and mannerisms. Just for you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFjSwp8OoRI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevor_1977 Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 I like Terry , but why did they have to have the annoying Fearne Cotton co presenting , as she stands for everything that is wrong with this country and all the dumbing down . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@contradevian Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 I loathe children who appear on TV who have gone to stage schools! Loathe the feckers with their exaggerated movements and mannerisms. Those three from that tedious sitcom particularly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smiffy1967 Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 I'd pay for him to stop! By the look of his complexion they must be paying him in Irish whiskey - he looks like a drunk and sounds like one when he does Eurovision His broken blood vessels show me that he is too drunk to be around kids and has a serious drinking problem - thats ok though because that legal drug called alcohol is much safer than cannabis according to our ignorant government Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.