Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

One of the most common arguments I keep seeing regarding inflation - "Raising rates isn't working, so stop raising, and cut"


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

The bank of England bought £65 billion pounds of bonds during the pandemic, not surprising have so much inflation, where did they expect the money to go?

This forcast was't very accurate.;)

file-20210422-21-1lalrpo.png?ixlib=rb-1.

 

Edited by winkie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442
1 minute ago, winkie said:

This forcast was't very accurate.;)

But... the forecast was very predictable.  Look how quickly the most expected value settles at the 2% target.   It's almost as if that part of the graph was fixed  - and the rest of it was only make-believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
47 minutes ago, The Angry Capitalist said:

Why not just keep interest rates at zero, then?

Why not just print money to infinity and tell the plebs to work harder?

You literally said that if inflation remains modestly high for 10 years there will probably be heads on spikes

A sight not seen in the UK for over 500 years

Then when challenged you suggest the poster wants zero interest rates?

You need a little balance and explore the middle ground more ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444
1 minute ago, scottbeard said:

You need a little balance and explore the middle ground more ...

Did you not realise that you were responding to someone called "The Angry Capitalist"?

The middle ground is no-man's-land in an epic battle between competing unhinged ideologies against an incoherent backdrop of nonsense.  Is any alternative feasible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446
18 minutes ago, scottbeard said:

You literally said that if inflation remains modestly high for 10 years there will probably be heads on spikes

A sight not seen in the UK for over 500 years

Then when challenged you suggest the poster wants zero interest rates?

You need a little balance and explore the middle ground more ...

It seems harsh for a poster who states he is emotional in his name to be criticised for being emotional. It also seems strange for a poster who states he is emotional in his name to not otherwise acknowledge he is being emotional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
46 minutes ago, scottbeard said:

You literally said that if inflation remains modestly high for 10 years there will probably be heads on spikes

A sight not seen in the UK for over 500 years

Then when challenged you suggest the poster wants zero interest rates?

You need a little balance and explore the middle ground more ...

The poster alluded to Zimbabwe and argued that the Brits would just shrug off the problem and move on.

If things are not addressed we will be in a situation not seen since 500 years ago.

We are in an extreme situation that will require extreme measures to solve.

My argument was the government's main priority is inflation.

The poster disagreed to which my response was to question why not take rates back to zero.

If the government didn't consider inflation the priority they would have done that hence my argument.

You need to read between the lines.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
2 minutes ago, The Angry Capitalist said:

The poster alluded to Zimbabwe and argued that the Brits would just shrug off the problem and move on.

If things are not addressed we will be in a situation not seen since 500 years ago.

We are in an extreme situation that will require extreme measures to solve.

My argument was the government's main priority is inflation.

The poster disagreed to which my response was to question why not take rates back to zero.

If the government didn't consider inflation the priority they would have done that hence my argument.

You need to read between the lines.

No, that is a lie. Or you are genuinely stupid, in which case I accept that.

He stated that we are very unlikely to end up in a Zimbabwe situation, which is not the same as not dealing with the problems we have. Thinking a broken leg should be fixed does not require us to think it is the Black Death.

Since 1523, we have had a reformation, a civil war, an invasion, succession crisis, Impending invasion from France and the battle of Waterloo, civic strife and charterism, pending invasion from Germany. 

You keep writing silly things and getting outraged that people recognise them as silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
12 minutes ago, The Angry Capitalist said:

My argument was the government's main priority is inflation.

Since Jeremy Hunt says the same as you I can't help but agree that it is, and they have said so!

13 minutes ago, The Angry Capitalist said:

If things are not addressed we will be in a situation not seen since 500 years ago.

We are in an extreme situation that will require extreme measures to solve.

That is quite a bold viewpoint, which doesn't make it incorrect, but it needs to be put in context.  You're saying that the current situation is worse than 5 centuries of wars, depressions, pandemics etc. and also worse than the 1970s when inflation was higher than it is today.

I don't agree. 

15 minutes ago, The Angry Capitalist said:

You need to read between the lines.

OK - but it's more helpful to post your actual considered view as per this recent post than outlandish stuff about heads on spikes, with the expectation that readers "read between the lines" to what you actually mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
1 minute ago, Bob8 said:

No, that is a lie. Or you are genuinely stupid, in which case I accept that.

He stated that we are very unlikely to end up in a Zimbabwe situation, which is not the same as not dealing with the problems we have. Thinking a broken leg should be fixed does not require us to think it is the Black Death.

Since 1523, we have had a reformation, a civil war, an invasion, succession crisis, Impending invasion from France and the battle of Waterloo, civic strife and charterism, pending invasion from Germany. 

You keep writing silly things and getting outraged that people recognise them as silly.

No Bob8. I am not outraged at all.

You keep posting in reply to many of my threads with utter nonsense and your ignorance is beginning to infuriate me.

Here is what he said:

"We can look at places like Zimbabwe to see what really happens. Eventually their Government told people to forget about their failed currency and use USD or RSA instead."
 

He flippantly replied and alluded to  a situation where the UK government would just shrug their shoulders and tell the plebs to never-mind the inflation just get on with your lives like the example he gave and his wording.

This goes back to my original response with that poster by stating inflation is the number one priority for the UK government and trying to show why.

That poster disagreed and clearly you can see this by his responses.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
5 minutes ago, scottbeard said:

Since Jeremy Hunt says the same as you I can't help but agree that it is, and they have said so!

That is quite a bold viewpoint, which doesn't make it incorrect, but it needs to be put in context.  You're saying that the current situation is worse than 5 centuries of wars, depressions, pandemics etc. and also worse than the 1970s when inflation was higher than it is today.

I don't agree. 

OK - but it's more helpful to post your actual considered view as per this recent post than outlandish stuff about heads on spikes, with the expectation that readers "read between the lines" to what you actually mean.

Although it is highly unlikely we could possibly go down the road of hyperinflation.

Look at Weimar Germany and other places that have experienced this. It wasn't pretty.

I would say that is an extreme situation. Has Britain ever had this?

Not to my knowledge.

Not saying my viewpoint is correct.

I am just trying to show how precarious Britain's situation is.

I do think the inflation problem will be solved. But it could easily get out of control. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
37 minutes ago, The Angry Capitalist said:

I do think the inflation problem will be solved. But it could easily get out of control. 

Quite so, agreed

Also - the implications of sustained high inflation, even if not true HYPERinflation, are significant.

If we have inflation running at 10-15% for the next 10 years that's very serious, even if it doesn't meet the definition of hyperinflation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
15 minutes ago, scottbeard said:

Quite so, agreed

Also - the implications of sustained high inflation, even if not true HYPERinflation, are significant.

If we have inflation running at 10-15% for the next 10 years that's very serious, even if it doesn't meet the definition of hyperinflation.

Yes.

Getting to the stage of hyperinflation takes gross incompetence but a few years of very high inflation will start to change people's mentality towards currency and the velocity of money could really go into overdrive.

Once people start spending all their money as they receive it and don't save any of it then it can get out of control.

Trust is lost and getting that back is close to impossible.

What are rates in Argentina now? 90% +?

And it is still not working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
1 hour ago, The Angry Capitalist said:

No Bob8. I am not outraged at all.

You keep posting in reply to many of my threads with utter nonsense and your ignorance is beginning to infuriate me.

Here is what he said:

"We can look at places like Zimbabwe to see what really happens. Eventually their Government told people to forget about their failed currency and use USD or RSA instead."
 

He flippantly replied and alluded to  a situation where the UK government would just shrug their shoulders and tell the plebs to never-mind the inflation just get on with your lives like the example he gave and his wording.

This goes back to my original response with that poster by stating inflation is the number one priority for the UK government and trying to show why.

That poster disagreed and clearly you can see this by his responses.

 

I am happy to accept you are right.

I should warn you though, a rather hysterical person has been logging in to your account and writing hysterical posts. I suggest you update your password.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
44 minutes ago, The Angry Capitalist said:

Yes.

Getting to the stage of hyperinflation takes gross incompetence but a few years of very high inflation will start to change people's mentality towards currency and the velocity of money could really go into overdrive.

Once people start spending all their money as they receive it and don't save any of it then it can get out of control.

Trust is lost and getting that back is close to impossible.

What are rates in Argentina now? 90% +?

And it is still not working.

Or a deliberate effort to make a currency worthless to indirectly default on a debt owed (see the Weimar republic). Were the dollar to lose it's reserve status, how could the US repay it's $33 trillion or more of (official) debt (including unfunded liabilities it's in the hundreds of trillions). I would imagine hyperinflation would be a very tempting option in that circumstance...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
5 hours ago, A.steve said:

But... the forecast was very predictable.  Look how quickly the most expected value settles at the 2% target.   It's almost as if that part of the graph was fixed  - and the rest of it was only make-believe.

No trust or credibility left.....talk a load of nonsense.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
2 hours ago, nero120 said:

Or a deliberate effort to make a currency worthless to indirectly default on a debt owed (see the Weimar republic). Were the dollar to lose it's reserve status, how could the US repay it's $33 trillion or more of (official) debt (including unfunded liabilities it's in the hundreds of trillions). I would imagine hyperinflation would be a very tempting option in that circumstance...

Even without losing reserve currency status I can't see how the US debt gets repaid unless with very high inflation as a minimum.

$33 trillion is an unfathomable number.

US is at a threshold like Britain, I think.

Either deflation and positive rates or inflate & die. 

This is looking like the last chance for western economies to get their house in order.

If not, it's looking like inflation will be the result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
18 hours ago, Several said:

People in their last couple of decades have less incentive to save!

How do higher interest rates help to bring down inflation? Higher interest rates make it more expensive for people to borrow money and encourage people to save. Overall, that means people will tend to spend less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
1 hour ago, cdd said:

How do higher interest rates help to bring down inflation? Higher interest rates make it more expensive for people to borrow money and encourage people to save. Overall, that means people will tend to spend less.

And give the Bank Of Boomer more interest returns with which to enjoy their last decade or two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
4 hours ago, cdd said:

How do higher interest rates help to bring down inflation? Higher interest rates make it more expensive for people to borrow money and encourage people to save. Overall, that means people will tend to spend less.

They do the same to companies and increase unemployment, this damping pay demands too. At this level they deliberately break the economy a little bit to dampen inflation rather more ruthlessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
22
HOLA4423
23
HOLA4424
1 minute ago, Bluto Bites said:

Is extremely high inflation good news for those with mortgages?

Only WAGE inflation is good news, not food prices.

Your dinner costing more doesn't make paying your mortgage easier

The reverse in fact if it means interest rate rises without wage rises

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425

Inflation is obviously a political and economic problem for politicians and central banks, but it isn't their main concern as it was in the 70s and 80s. In the US Paul Volcker was employed and given the green light to do whatever it took. In the UK I believe we had double digit interest rates. If it was their main concern we wouldn't have had the chancellor recently raising pensions and other benefits by 10 percent. Politicians would have made the public take the horrible medicine( as rightwing government s would have done in the late 70s) instead of subsidising electricity bills with billions of pounds.

Politicians and central banks long term main concern, as it has been since the financial crisis, is fear of deflation and unpayable private debt pulling down the economy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information