Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Electric checks in rented homes confirmed by government


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
2 hours ago, Confusion of VIs said:

Unless you are one of the "if it saves one life" anything is worth doing types, you would want to know what is the level of risk you are protecting against.

In the case of electricity given that every house should have an RCD protected supply, it is probably so small as to make it not cost effective (not cost effective meaning you could save far more lives if you spent the money elsewhere). 

 

RCDs fail, or get bypassed when they nuisance trip.

Only compulsory from 2008 onwards for certain circuits (Although fitted as standard a long time before that on some builds*)

*If you want to trust a 30 year old RCD still works as well as new that's up to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1
HOLA442
13 hours ago, Bruce Banner said:

Rents won't rise immediately, as a direct result of electrical safety certs, but I'm pretty sure that in five years time rents will be higher than they would have been had the new legal requirements not been imposed.

 

No they won't be, as explained ad nauseum.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
7 minutes ago, mrtickle said:

Rents are set by the maximum the market will bear based on local wages, and not the landlord's costs. This has been explained to you ad nauseum so please don't pretend it hasn't.

It has also been explained by me, often. But it's not what people can afford, it's the going market rate for the area. I can afford to pay £10 for a packet of crisps, but I won't if the market rate is 50p.

Individual landlords won't get away with charging over the going market rate, but over a period of some years additional costs will find their way into that market rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
32 minutes ago, mrtickle said:

Rents are set by the maximum the market will bear based on local wages, and not the landlord's costs. This has been explained to you ad nauseum so please don't pretend it hasn't.

I've also explained that electrical test and inspection (And gas, and legionella) is already done as standard by all the agents I know of, at change of tenancy, so it's not a new cost anyway.

It seems to be incapable of processing new data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
8 minutes ago, chronyx said:

I've also explained that electrical test and inspection (And gas, and legionella) is already done as standard by all the agents I know of, at change of tenancy, so it's not a new cost anyway.

It seems to be incapable of processing new data.

Perhaps all the ones you do that particular work for, but I have never received an electrical test and inspection, nor a legionella cert. all of the gas certs I have received expire on the anniversary of the last test, not the start of the tenancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
3 hours ago, Dorkins said:

So did this landlady ever face charges for manslaughter? If not, why not? Seems open and shut to me.

Why, there was not requirement to have a check and accidental death was recorded so how could there be a charge of manslaughter.

How much would mandatory testing cost and how many lives would it actually save. If we take an estimate of testing requiring say 3m checks a year at say £200 each, that's a £600m a year industry.

The only reference I could find was to deaths per year was a second hand reference to an ONS report which stated that deaths at home due to faulty wiring equipment had declined from around 70 in the 1960s to 3 in 2013. If this is true it really is not justified as there are far more effective things you could do with even a tenth of that amount of money.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
26 minutes ago, Bruce Banner said:

Perhaps all the ones you do that particular work for, but I have never received an electrical test and inspection, nor a legionella cert. all of the gas certs I have received expire on the anniversary of the last test, not the start of the tenancy.

Yes, and you organised all of that so your tenancy is not like other tenancies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
4 hours ago, Confusion of VIs said:

In the case of electricity given that every house should have an RCD protected supply, it is probably so small as to make it not cost effective (not cost effective meaning you could save far more lives if you spent the money elsewhere). 

I guess most recent (how recent?) places have them, but plenty of others don't. My Dad still has a good old fashioned fuse box in the cellar, some of which I think you actually have to replace the wire itself. God only knows how much it would cost to bring a place like that up to code. I wonder how far these new regs go? Some older places might be up for ten grand's worth of complete rewire. Likewise the stricter insulation standards coming in for rentals (or are they already here?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
1 minute ago, Bruce Banner said:

No, I was talking about the certificates I received at the beginning of the tenancy, not the ones I arranged. All were gas only.

I was never aware of a tenant receiving copies of anything.  All mine were sent to the agent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
1 minute ago, chronyx said:

I was never aware of a tenant receiving copies of anything.  All mine were sent to the agent. 

I always asked for them so I'd know when the next inspection was due and could make sure the agent had no excuse to enter my home, or give a key to a third party, whilst I was away. If the inspection was due at a time I would be away, I would ask the agent to get it done early and I would pay for the unexpired portion. This, of course, was when the agent, or landlord, was arranging it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
11 minutes ago, mattyboy1973 said:

I guess most recent (how recent?) places have them, but plenty of others don't. My Dad still has a good old fashioned fuse box in the cellar, some of which I think you actually have to replace the wire itself. God only knows how much it would cost to bring a place like that up to code. I wonder how far these new regs go? Some older places might be up for ten grand's worth of complete rewire. Likewise the stricter insulation standards coming in for rentals (or are they already here?).

I would support regulation that mandates updating/replacing wiring that does not have RCD protection on all of the circuits or has pre PVC insulation but once that's done its safe enough. 

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
2 minutes ago, Confusion of VIs said:

I would support regulation that mandates updating/replacing wiring that does not have RCD protection on all of the circuits or has pre PVC insulation but once that's done its safe enough. 

   

Can you write to the IET please? Arc fault interrupters are now 'recommended' so bound to become mandatory in the next regs at some point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
7 minutes ago, chronyx said:

Can you write to the IET please? Arc fault interrupters are now 'recommended' so bound to become mandatory in the next regs at some point. 

That's interesting. If I can find one of those with integrated RCD, that will fit into my existing consumer box as a direct replacement for the RCD, I might buy one and bung it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
1 hour ago, chronyx said:

Can you write to the IET please? Arc fault interrupters are now 'recommended' so bound to become mandatory in the next regs at some point. 

1. Is there any evidence they have reduced electrical fires in the US/Canada?

2. What is the comparative rate of fire that might be prevented by AFDDs in 230V installations rather than 120V ones?

[Dr Koala Bear BEng MEng CEng]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
1 minute ago, koala_bear said:

1. Is there any evidence they have reduced electrical fires in the US/Canada?

2. What is the comparative rate of fire that might be prevented by AFDDs in 230V installations rather than 120V ones?

[Dr Koala Bear BEng MEng CEng]

I meant to tell them that they've done enough and can now stop :lol: Joe Public is happy

Up until now they thought a 300mA RCD was suitable for fire protection in agricultural installations (So I assume hay, straw, etc).  Brown envelopes from electrical equipment manufacturers? Who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
2 hours ago, Confusion of VIs said:

I would support regulation that mandates updating/replacing wiring that does not have RCD protection on all of the circuits or has pre PVC insulation but once that's done its safe enough. 

   

It is considered safer not to have RCD protection on circuits power smoke / fire alarms but apart from that I generally agree.

XLPE insulation has much longer lifespan than PVC and might be a better bet given most installations are used beyond the nominal PVC lifespan (conservative).

VIR has been gone from new use in over 50 years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
14 minutes ago, chronyx said:

I meant to tell them that they've done enough and can now stop :lol: Joe Public is happy

Up until now they thought a 300mA RCD was suitable for fire protection in agricultural installations (So I assume hay, straw, etc).  Brown envelopes from electrical equipment manufacturers? Who knows.

Sounds like nuisance tripping prevention to me! I forget what is safe the cow /horse front rear legs difference as i think that is some where in the mix too!

I gave up writing letter/email when they took the brown paper envelopes from the manufacturers to allow plastic consumer units and history has proved me right on that one. AFDDs are pretty waste of time as there are far more effective methods improve electrical safety in virtually all cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
23
HOLA4424
1 minute ago, koala_bear said:

I gave up writing letter/email when they took the brown paper envelopes from the manufacturers to allow plastic consumer units and history has proved me right on that one. AFDDs are pretty waste of time as there are far more effective methods improve electrical safety in virtually all cases.

Yeah, probably be back to wood after this round of metal C.U.s for sustainability :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425
3 hours ago, Bruce Banner said:

You certainly have to watch them. The quotes I recently received for a boiler service varied between £48 and £96. I went for one at £50 because the price was reasonable and he talked sense, not well rehearsed tales of woe. 

Never paid monthly premium for a boiler service.....I have worked it out better off putting the money away would have paid and using it to pay for any repair if need be in the future....local reliable and trustworthy  tradesman of course.....many years later not needed, but plenty enough now to pay for it, the sum keeps on growing and the boiler keeps on going.;)

 

Edit to mention: All homes should have both a smoke detector/s and a carbon monoxide detector if have a gas boiler.

Edited by winkie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information