Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Possession Of Dangerous Chemicals


anonguest

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

When I was growing up, not that long ago, it was fairly easy to not be a criminal. A few things were prohibited - such robbing and injuring people but mostly you could get on and do what you liked. Which, as rural boy, for me included walking round with a sheath knife, cycling to mate's farms with a gun, making "fireworks" (would probably today be called IEDs), etc.

These days, I suspect the vast majority of the population are criminals - "enemies of the state", not "of the people" though.

In my tinfoil hat moments, I've wondered if the push for electric cars is regarded as having the side benefit of removing a high energy substance (petrol) from the hands of the public. The police already try and prevent petrol stations from selling it to anyone without a car. I discovered this when I cycled round to get some fuel for my mower.

It's meant to demoralise us. If the state wants us out of the way it can always find something to prosecute us for. See Tommy Robinson and his 'mortgage fraud'. Oh, but he was bad! It's alright until it turns out you are the bad one.

We need a return to the common law, made by the people for the people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1
HOLA442

Oxalic acid - most of the furniture restorers and french polishers in the country (and as I learned above, beekeepers)

Sodium Chlorate - a substantial proportion of gardeners

Nitric acid / hydrogen peroxide - anyone doing home gold recovery from computer chips etc.

Mercury - anyone with an old thermometer

Boot stamping on face allright

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443

Oxalic acid - most of the furniture restorers and french polishers in the country (and as I learned above, beekeepers)

Sodium Chlorate - a substantial proportion of gardeners

Nitric acid / hydrogen peroxide - anyone doing home gold recovery from computer chips etc.

Mercury - anyone with an old thermometer

Boot stamping on face allright

Hasn't the sale of those already been stopped under separate H&S laws? If not I'm amazed, given how things are going!

In any case I suspect that existing owners of those will be exmpted since the mercury is negligible and not 'loose'.

But again, as you point out, the list of innocuous and innocent activities for which various chemicals can be justified to be owned in reasonable quantities.

I'll bet that most (all?) MPs don't even know about this new legislative 'trap'. Indeed I wonder howmany themselves probably have one of more of those restricted chemicals at home and, like myself, have long since forgotten about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444

Phosphoric acid? Commonly used soldering flux, I bought a bottle, without any checks at all, just a couple of months ago. It's not very concentrated but it didn't say how much in the list above. The stuff's in coca cola too, need ID for buying that now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446

Oxalic acid - most of the furniture restorers and french polishers in the country (and as I learned above, beekeepers)

And yacht owners.

It's recommended you use 80% acetic acid for sterilising your frames.

It'll melt your eyes and lungs as well as concrete. Apparently not banned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
Mercury - anyone with an old thermometer

The list just seemed to mention various mercury compounds rather than plain elemental mercury. Obviouslt poisonous but perhaps the bomb thing again? Some are explosive (they are / were used for detonators).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448

The list just seemed to mention various mercury compounds rather than plain elemental mercury. Obviouslt poisonous but perhaps the bomb thing again? Some are explosive (they are / were used for detonators).

Read it again. It clearly states Mercury and various compounds.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449

The list just seemed to mention various mercury compounds rather than plain elemental mercury. Obviouslt poisonous but perhaps the bomb thing again? Some are explosive (they are / were used for detonators).

You can make some of the most ghastly poisons based around mercury. Read up on wiki.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414

I have been thinking of taking up fishing again and noticed that loads of knives are availble for fishing and there are a few Bear Gryles branded knives for sale - all which appear fixed blades - so I imagine people use them for camping, fishing, etc.

Oh, fishing. Thank goodness for that. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416

Can't see that, at least on the list posted in here. I've not tried looking at any official crap.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supplying-explosives-precursors/supplying-explosives-precursors-and-poison#regulated-substancesl

It's in the poisons section.

"Mercury and its compounds (including: nitrates of mercury; oxides of mercury; mercuric cyanide oxides; mercuric thiocyanate; ammonium mercuric chlorides; potassium mercuric iodides; organic compounds of mercury which contain a methyl group directly linked to the mercury atom)"

The liquid metal itself is stated first. The above sentence clearly specifies that the pure metal on its own is also a restricted material and thus possession of it (presumably in free and loose form, i.e. in a bottle) requires a licence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417

Nobody is going to get arrested for having an old bottle of hydrogen peroxide as it's probably just water by now. Still pisses me off though. the 35% stuff can get rid of warts but the 12% stuff doesn't.

Indeed. The whole issue of the low concentration thresholds for some of the listed chemicals got me wondering.

Presumably, for example, 3% nitric acid can be made more conecntrated relatively easily? If so then obviously the user would end up with reduced volume of liquid to work with, so they would just buy more (unrestricted!) in the first place. A bit like having to buy multiple packs a paracetamol because they are legally limted to only 16 pills per pack.

Or maybe there is no easy way to enhance the concentration of, for example, 10% hydrogen peroxide to, say, >20% - and TPTB don't have to worry about that issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420

Concentrate H2o2 by freezing the water.If you don't want it too concentrated pour it off before all the water is frozen.

Oh really!? I never thought of that! Can it really be that easy???

My undertstanding is that at significanlty high concentrations it can be quite a nasty substance to handle/deal with? So one would have to be careful presumably about just how much water was removed??

EDIT UPDATE:

Just checked Wikipedia. Seems your proposed method is highly impractical? Since it has almost the same melting temperature as normal water. But it does boil at a much higher 150degC. So perhaps it can be made more concentrated instead by careful and gentle evaporation of the unwanted water content?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supplying-explosives-precursors/supplying-explosives-precursors-and-poison#regulated-substancesl

It's in the poisons section.

"Mercury and its compounds (including: nitrates of mercury; oxides of mercury; mercuric cyanide oxides; mercuric thiocyanate; ammonium mercuric chlorides; potassium mercuric iodides; organic compounds of mercury which contain a methyl group directly linked to the mercury atom)"

The liquid metal itself is stated first. The above sentence clearly specifies that the pure metal on its own is also a restricted material and thus possession of it (presumably in free and loose form, i.e. in a bottle) requires a licence.

Ah, right, that's on the site but not on the list posted in this thread.

You presume free and loose form but it doesn't say, so maybe tough luck anyone with CFL light bulbs. Or fillings.

My mum said she used to have a bit of mercury she played with as a kid, with her bare hands. Just as well we don't do that these days but this is all rather going too far in the opposite direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422

Ah, right, that's on the site but not on the list posted in this thread.

You presume free and loose form but it doesn't say, so maybe tough luck anyone with CFL light bulbs. Or fillings.

My mum said she used to have a bit of mercury she played with as a kid, with her bare hands. Just as well we don't do that these days but this is all rather going too far in the opposite direction.

I've now made an appointment to see my MP on this matter.

I doubt that I'll be able to persuade them of the unncessarily overly officious manner of the new regulations (i.e the absurd licencing in order to possess) since, after all, the driving motive behind it, officially, is in the ongoing fight against terrorism - and we all know that anyone who dares question that must themselves automatically be suspect.

Rather I shall be driving home the point the manner is which it has been introduced with no public awareness campaign. Reading some more I see that in fact this particular gem of ever ongoing legislative diahorrea has its origins in an EU dictat. Quelle surprise - not!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423

Ah, right, that's on the site but not on the list posted in this thread.

You presume free and loose form but it doesn't say, so maybe tough luck anyone with CFL light bulbs. Or fillings.

My mum said she used to have a bit of mercury she played with as a kid, with her bare hands. Just as well we don't do that these days but this is all rather going too far in the opposite direction.

Yes, we play with it in the chem lab as kids. We were warned toe be careful though as it was very expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424

Oh really!? I never thought of that! Can it really be that easy???

My undertstanding is that at significanlty high concentrations it can be quite a nasty substance to handle/deal with? So one would have to be careful presumably about just how much water was removed??

EDIT UPDATE:

Just checked Wikipedia. Seems your proposed method is highly impractical? Since it has almost the same melting temperature as normal water. But it does boil at a much higher 150degC. So perhaps it can be made more concentrated instead by careful and gentle evaporation of the unwanted water content?

Quote from http://forums.welltrainedmind.com/topic/326082-chemistry-tip-concentrated-hydrogen-peroxide-cheaply/

"I'm 58 years old, and I first produced concentrated hydrogen peroxide by this method when I was about 12. I've done it many times since, and never had a problem"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425

Quote from http://forums.welltrainedmind.com/topic/326082-chemistry-tip-concentrated-hydrogen-peroxide-cheaply/

"I'm 58 years old, and I first produced concentrated hydrogen peroxide by this method when I was about 12. I've done it many times since, and never had a problem"

Still suspicious of the accuracy of this IF, as quoted, hydrogen peroxide has a freezing temperature within half a degree of that of water!

In practice, with an ordinary freezer, you won't stand a chance of separating the two in this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information