IMHAL Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 (edited) Seen this on the home page: Check out the comments: www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/6089383/The-troubling-side-of-Ben-Bernanke.html#comments And I thought that only HPC'ers where uber bear types that thought that Greenspan and Ben had destroyed the system with their ultra loose monetary policy and their printing. It appears that the apocalyptic concerns are now mainstream. If you ask a hardened thief what they have learned, they inevitably reply "don't get caught". If you ask Ben and Al what when wrong, they inevitably reply "not printing enough". Which is akin to hiding their thievery Both are hardened thiefs, both will cary on being thiefs because thats what they are, neither have remorse, neither have learned the error of their ways. It seems pretty clear to me now that the muther of all asset bubbles will be blown as we decend into a breakup boom. A breakup boom? the phase where insiders get to loot as much of the booty as they like given their insider knowledge. Edited August 30, 2009 by IMHAL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowrentyieldmakessense(honest!) Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 one of the comments This financial catastrophy was not engineered in the "manufacturing" sense, but more in the "social" sense: it was allowed to happen by knowledgeable people who could have stopped it, to create order out of chaos.You may have heard the phrase "New World Order" being uttered by Bush Snr, Clinton, Bush Chimp, Obama (I'm never going to forget the name Osama from now on...) and Gordon Brown. Why have they all used the same identical phrase? There must be an understanding of exactly what is meant by this NWO. ...JFK made one of his greatest speaches against secret societies, but soon after he was assassinated by a "magic bullet". Shame on his recently deceased brother for never having the fortitude to demand justice. First we had FJK, then Kaczynski, then Waco, then McVeigh, then ENRON, which was immediately followed by 9/11. ENRON is where the plot really accelerated. All the documents relating to the ENRON scandal were being stored in CIA offices in WTC-7. In case you where distracted by the Twin Towers collapsing (WTC-1 and WTC-2), Tower 7, WTC-7 was the building that collapsed a little later for no apparent reason. It was not hit by planes like the other two, yet it collapsed completely just like the towers, at free-fall speed. The reason increasing numbers of people believe "9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB", is because of Tower 7, WTC-7. Not only has no one explained how it fell, the BBC reported its collapse 25 minutes before it was seen collapsing behind the reporter! Who wrote the script that was being read? Where did it come from? In the footage (it is all over YouTube), the BBC reporter can be seen with the supposedly already collapsed building still standing in the background! The BBC later explained this away as an error and both the original copy and the backup tapes of the event have disappeared from their archives. Recently the BBC did an unrelated historical piece on spies in the BBC, but it is clear that there are still a few agents there making sure things run smoothly. It is well documented that SIS spooks are present in many organisations, in fact, it is logical. Many politicians have been vetted before being promoted to Home Secretary or Foreign Secretary. If there is one thing that is worth researching, it is WTC-7. ...So, we have the "GLOBAL" effort against terrorism, the "GLOBAL" effort against climate change, the "GLOBAL" financial crisis, the "GLOBAL" pandemic (SARS was another act of terrorism, as was anthrax). You would think that aeroplanes were invented in the last decade! ...If you still don't see the pattern, you might be one of the "GLOBAL" idiots. Conveniently, each of these "GLOBAL" problems could be resolved if the sheeple would just accept a One World Bank. Far fetched? Not at all! That is the way it is going while we continue to believe we have no say: the Euro, the Amero... the Russian President recently even showed off a One World coin with the writing: "UNITY FROM DIVERSITY" at a G8 meeting ...Order out of chaos. With a One World Bank and a multipurpose chip each we could ensure that everyone pays their carbon taxes and other taxes, that no one buys anything that is not approved, and that everyone does what they are told. ...Of course Obama re-appointed Bernanke. Without the FDR there would be no Obama. Obama has given the privately owned FDR even more privilages. Just as the Parliamentary system allows a Monarchy to exist (we would have soon copied the French otherwise), the bi-partisan system keeps the puppet-masters out of view (i.e., the banking families). If you think that Socialism is going to be for the common good, then you have strayed far from the meaning of life, which is to be free to invest your finite energies into your own choices, to realise your potential and to give your children the best chance in life. Perhaps in a saner society those 9 hours in the office could have been 4, with 5 to invest in your children and yourself - or maybe we all prefer to remain in denial. The Americans used to have a Constitutional Republic, then they allowed the FDR to take off like a cancer. What hope does any other country have if even America succumbs to socialism? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slurms mackenzie Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 (edited) Not only has no one explained how it fell, the BBC reported its collapse 25 minutes before it was seen collapsing behind the reporter! Who wrote the script that was being read? Where did it come from? In the footage (it is all over YouTube), the BBC reporter can be seen with the supposedly already collapsed building still standing in the background! The BBC later explained this away as an error and both the original copy and the backup tapes of the event have disappeared from their archives. So let me get this straight, if you were going to secretly blow up a tower, you'd let more people know about the consiracy to script some news that would be reported in due time anyway, that does what exactly? What do you gain from scripted news ? Why would you give yourself a chance to get caught out? You wouldn't. Edited August 30, 2009 by slurms mackenzie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMHAL Posted August 30, 2009 Author Share Posted August 30, 2009 one of the comments There are 43 cooments to choose from and you highlight the nut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Spaniard Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Another of the comments that I think is worth a read: Could it be that finally we are on the cusp of a revolution where people really start to understand the inverted pyramid and inherent instability at the heart of the scam of central banks and fractional reserve lending? Money created out of nothing backed by Government IOUs which make debtor pawns of us all, while banks and the hidden money oligarchy grow richer at all our expense? Couldn't government issue debt free money to its people directly rather than involving the banks? Much of this talk is condemned as conspiracy theory. It is not - banks have simply had it their way for far too long relying on the complicit silence of big Government and media outlets - all bailed out by Joe Dope the general public, who are lied to by big government in league with banking excess. Of course debt matters, banks profit from it and politicians stay in office having made promises they/we can't afford, which are then passed to future generations without a vote. Monetised debt doesn't matter only if the monetised value of that money becomes worthless. This is the second wave of inflation taxation that hits the public's pocket after the more public first wave of general direct taxation. Gold is still sky high. Why one wonders? Why is no one talking? Why was Caroll Quigley's book, Tragedy and Hope, describing the banking scam of the financial elites suppressed in the US? Why is the Federal Reserve seen as a branch of US Government when it isn't Federal and has no Reserves. Are central banks really on our, the people's side? Who owns the gold in Fort Knox confiscated from the American people? If it is not the US Government then who owns it? Liam Halligan and ARP lead the way. There is a story to be told to the general public and once those details are known there will be hell to pay. Brown and co are just pawns in all this led by their silly little egos trying to do "good", when the greatest good is served by charity as just that (beginning at home) with people allowed to keep more of their own money so that big state debt slavery whithers. Capitalism and free markets are good. Private property is good along with individual freedom. But we are not free and don't have free markets and it's the money oligarchy getting away with murder again at all our expense. Something is going to give, but people have to start reading up on it. Goldman-Sachs and co had better start worrying - because it's time to get the pitch forks out. They've even solved that though haven't they, by making weapon systems, out of printed money, so expensive it will always give big government the edge over the masses who might want to take the b*st**ds on. Democracy only thrives when weaponry is cheap and available to people and Government alike. Then government know they can only push things so far. We're all being f***ed by big Government and big money and there's no one out there talking about it, or trying to right it, and therefore no one to vote for. It calls into question the whole international banking enterprise which has lost sight of lending for projects that add true value in the real world. This is not going to end well. John Parsons, August 26, 2009 at 07:26 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 WTC-7 IS a wierd story.... it was on fire on the WRONG side... it did fall like a demolition. it wasnt particularly near the other two buildings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 They needed to get rid of WTC-7 because it was packed full of FBI/FED etc. documents that they wanted to destroy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y-QUERK Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 There was a brick lose at the base of WTC7. Thats why it fell down. No conspiracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan B'Stard MP Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 There was a brick lose at the base of WTC7. Thats why it fell down. No conspiracy. Not entirely untrue. It had a chunk of its inards removed to create a trading floor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Not entirely untrue. It had a chunk of its inards removed to create a trading floor. oh, so that caused the fires. oh, and the WTC buildings were designed as open plan floors. removing partitions wouldnt affect the scructure, as it doesnt in any building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Take Me Back To London! Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 (edited) If the U.S. government was competent and ruthlessness enough to arrange the huge and complicated 9/11 conspiracy, why did they not simply fit up Saddam Hussein with some WMDs before or after the Iraq war, which would of saved them all the flack for not finding WMDs and put George Bush in a very strong position? Edited August 30, 2009 by Take Me Back To London! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?...! Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 100,000 tons of steel and concrete falls 1/4 mile to the ground, and you are incredulous that a building 200 yards away could be fatally damaged? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@contradevian Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 FEMA report here; http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf WTC7 was hit by debris, caught fire and collapsed. End of. Anyone on this forum in the demolition business care to comment? Because I've seen the work that goes into the controlled demolition of (empty) council blocks, and its not plausible to do this with people still working in it, without severe disruption. Anyway, please back to Bernanke. He's more interesting, and certainly more dangerous! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Injin Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 FEMA report here;http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf WTC7 was hit by debris, caught fire and collapsed. End of. Anyone on this forum in the demolition business care to comment? Because I've seen the work that goes into the controlled demolition of (empty) council blocks, and its not plausible to do this with people still working in it, without severe disruption. Anyway, please back to Bernanke. He's more interesting, and certainly more dangerous! I suspect that such buildings are dsigned to collapse inwards in the case of problems - after all the devastation (and cost) is much less than if the bastards keel over sideways that way. I can understand why they don't advertise the fact though. Bernanke however, very definitely has conspired to steal trillions of wealth. The guys on some other plane when it comes to stealing. So far beyond theft it seems to be coming from the other side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Take Me Back To London! Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Bernanke however, very definitely has conspired to steal trillions of wealth. The guys on some other plane when it comes to stealing. So far beyond theft it seems to be coming from the other side. +1 The 9/11 conspiracy is a complete distraction to what is really going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traktion Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Wow! More evidence that people are starting to wake up! When the masses realise what has been going on, they are going to be angry... VERY angry! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.