Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Independent: After The Recent Bull Run...correction Soon?


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444

Buy the dips.

The bigger the dip the better the buying opp. 6000 or 5xxx would be just fabulous but obviously an outlier so unlikely unless we have a panic dislocation somewhere.

It's a shame FreeTrader no longer updates his excellent thread comparing the current cycle with the prior cycles and wages. That set out part of the context very clearly I thought.

Edited by R K
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
4
HOLA445

He's at it again....now it's not a question of it.........BUT WHEN....

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/comment/hamish-mcrae/hamish-mcrae-us-inc-is-pretty-chipper-but-there-will-be-a-correction-to-the-stock-market-before-too-long-9639028.html

edit. Very grateful to the Independent and indeed Telegraph for keeping their business links open to everybody....not so the Times and FT.

Edited by crashmonitor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
6
HOLA447

So we've seen the first real test of the Taper this week. With US Treasury supply now forecast to run at around $60bn/month in net new paper but QE reduced to ~$30bn/month the dealers no longer have enough free cash from the Fed to cover their monthly purchases for the first time in nearly two years. Seems like they're struggling to hold the dunny upright! :D

Buy the dip? Sell the rip!

U.S. stocks resumed a selloff, wiping out yesterday’s rebound and sending benchmark indexes to the lowest close since May, as energy shares tumbled and concern increased over escalating tensions in Ukraine.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index slipped 1 percent to 1,920.18 at 4 p.m. in New York, the lowest level since May 29. The index climbed 0.7 percent yesterday after the biggest weekly loss in two years. The Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index jumped 9.7 percent.

Selling accelerated after the S&P 500 slipped below last week’s closing level of 1,925.15 and yesterday’s intraday low of 1,921.20. The gauge has lost more than 3.4 percent since reaching a record high of 1,987.98 on July 24 and is about 70 points from erasing its gain for the year.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-08-05/u-dot-s-dot-stock-index-futures-are-little-changed-as-aig-gains

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448

So we've seen the first real test of the Taper this week. With US Treasury supply now forecast to run at around $60bn/month in net new paper but QE reduced to ~$30bn/month the dealers no longer have enough free cash from the Fed to cover their monthly purchases for the first time in nearly two years.

Um, but with such a huge gap between the two surely, well, surely the Fed will just 'un-taper' or come up with some other money printing.

If what you say is true - and I don't doubt you - who buys the new paper? What happens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
Guest The Relaxation Suite

When the mainstream media is telling you that there is an imminent crash (or anything for that matter), then you know that there isn't one coming any time soon.

Exactly. When was the last time a mainstream media conduit successfully predicted an economic turn and enriched the masses in so doing? These outlets are owned by the top, and it is rarely in their interests to share their insider tips with millions of plebs. As far as access to the information is possible, and mostly it is not, the key to prediction is watching what the members of the patrician class do, not what they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413

Exactly. When was the last time a mainstream media conduit successfully predicted an economic turn and enriched the masses in so doing? These outlets are owned by the top, and it is rarely in their interests to share their insider tips with millions of plebs. As far as access to the information is possible, and mostly it is not, the key to prediction is watching what the members of the patrician class do, not what they say.

Nassim Taleb in "the black swan" lays out how professional economists and financial journalists have never, ever, ever predicted a single recession. Not a single time, without a single exception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414

The S&P 500 is either going to take 2000pts as a new support or resistance level. We'll find out in the coming weeks. I would say it would be a new floor once we are safely above lets say 2100pts whic is a good distance away. A bull market climbs a wall of worry, but no guarantees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415

I just had a look. The best cash ISA I can find is: [drum roll] 2.2% over 5 years.

I will take my chances on the stock market. If I lose I lose Just put £3000 more in yesterday because of a dip and earning nothing in my current account.

On a very simplistic view. If interest rates are going to be half what they were in the passed shouldn't the stock market be double.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416

Um, but with such a huge gap between the two surely, well, surely the Fed will just 'un-taper' or come up with some other money printing.

If what you say is true - and I don't doubt you - who buys the new paper? What happens?

The Primary Dealers will buy the Treasury paper because they're obliged to make a market for all govt debt. For the past two years, in fact for most of the last five, these purchases have been comfortably covered by the monthly amounts of QE cash they've been receiving from the Fed. This is no longer true. This month, for the first time in two years or thereabouts, the issuance of new Treasury debt will exceed the monthly QE handout. The Primary Dealers still have to buy the paper but will now have to finance it themselves. The simplest way for them to do so is to partially liquidate their equity positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417

I sold some shares last week. As a LTBH fanatic this is a truly remarkable event. OK, it was only 5% of my equity holding but it's still remarkable. I sold Marks & Spencer (for a decent profit - but why on earth did I buy those fools? (answer: diversification)) and a couple of tiddler companies that had had a stupidly profitable run over the past two years.

Excluding the value of a DB pension, I'm now at 67% equities (40% if you count the pension as a bond). This is low exposure for me and I expect to buy back to 80-85% over the next year or so. Trouble is, I can't see much in the way of appetising value just now. I think I'm suffering from "anchoring" - I did a lot of buying 2009/2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418

David Stockman makes a compelling case for the short side.

http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/market-maven-warns-feds-3rd-bubble-this-century-heading-for-20-tumble/

...ZIRP has fueled the most massive carry-trade speculation ever recorded. Indeed, zero money market rates inherently tilt the scales toward relentless gambling in risk assets by essentially eliminating the carry cost of speculative positions. At the same time, the Fed’s implied “put” under the market has generated a relentless “buy on the dips” reflex among fast money traders and computerized algos. Accordingly, as the stock market bubble has inflated to ever more precarious heights since March 2009, the dips have become increasingly shallow and short-lived, as dramatically illustrated by the S&P 500 chart below:

Obama5yrTurnaroundSP500.jpg

The meaning of this pattern is straight forward. This parabolic rise would never occur in an honest capital market unless the underlying economy was going through a surge of growth that has no precedent in recorded history. In fact, the US economy is impaled in more nearly the opposite condition—-that is, real GDP growth since the era of bubble finance hit full stride in 1999-2000, has been the lowest in modern history. Compared to a trend rate of 3.3% in the last half of the 20th century, real GDP growth has averaged just 1.8% per annum during the last 14 years. And that’s based on the understated GDP price deflators published by the Washington statistical mills. The true rate of growth is surely far lower, if positive at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421
21
HOLA4422
22
HOLA4423
23
HOLA4424
24
HOLA4425

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information