OnlyMe Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Note the number of FORMER this and FORMER that delegates. They are by definition, FORMER......they should be gone...but no, they are not...they are still there influencing thinking...says something about their rank in the Organisation..and they clearly are having an influence somewhere...even though they are supposed to be GONE. They haven't gone - they have arrived, via the route of supposed representation of the public interest on the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 R5L discussing the meeting now, tone is "jokey". Its so jokey they have declared the airspace over it Purple. thats no fly to you and me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuggets Mahoney Posted June 6, 2013 Author Share Posted June 6, 2013 R5L discussing the meeting now, tone is "jokey". A few years ago Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, Ted Turner, Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller, George Soros and others met secretly in New York City to discuss population control and eugenics philanthropy. It was memorably pitched as a gathering of the Super Friends, out to save the world... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTaUE1bhD4Y Now that's what I call objective, completely independent reporting. 'Jokey' is probably no better but it's marginally less nausea-inducing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord D'arcy Pew Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 We should just refer to them as SPECTRE (SPecial Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion) Getting Governments to borrowing money they believed would never have to be repaid was pure criminal genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
200p Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Listen to the Alex Jones Show, coverage on location http://rss.infowars.com/Alex.rss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winkie Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Listen to the Alex Jones Show, coverage on location http://rss.infowars.com/Alex.rss Something on here if interested. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10103054/Bilderberg-2013-the-worlds-most-secretive-conference-live.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 And what is happening in the Watford Big Brother House today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest_GradualCringe_* Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 I had a quick watch of the Alex Jones footage and it just shows how detached and self serving politicians and their cronies have become, in that I thought the police were employed to keep the peace and protect the public, not post guard around a hotel at the request of a small elite. The same goes for the houses of parliament too (does anyone else find the permanent presence of police wielding automatic firearms completely bizarre?) which has changed beyond all recognition from 20 years ago. If these people are here to serve us, why do they need such heavy protection from us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GloomMonger Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 Hey, it's ok, Dave is going. He'll sort them out. http://news.sky.com/story/1100692/bilderberg-pm-to-attend-secretive-meeting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuggets Mahoney Posted June 7, 2013 Author Share Posted June 7, 2013 I had a quick watch of the Alex Jones footage and it just shows how detached and self serving politicians and their cronies have become, in that I thought the police were employed to keep the peace and protect the public, not post guard around a hotel at the request of a small elite. The same goes for the houses of parliament too (does anyone else find the permanent presence of police wielding automatic firearms completely bizarre?) which has changed beyond all recognition from 20 years ago. If these people are here to serve us, why do they need such heavy protection from us? It's the New Normal innit? A case can be made for having armed men to hand and on call. Having armed men parade around in everyone's face is an entirely different kettle of fish imho. I was waiting for someone on the street outside Kings X Station for a quarter of an hour the other day and watched four Met officers armed with machine pistols strutting up and down all over the place. I didn't feel any safer for their presence at all but rather felt quite f***ed off. This stuff isn't about security impo. It's about the illusion of security, with a little low level intimidation of the general population thrown in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oracle Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 And what is happening in the Watford Big Brother House today? and therein lies the rub. IF "they" continue with their mistreatment and/or contempt of the little people, time after time history shows that the backlash from these type of scenarios is not pretty. ...king louis of france/marie antoinette etc( let them eat cake)........ adolf hitler( it is good that our citizenry have not the ability to think)...... ceaucescu/honecker various roman emperors one or two english monarchs you could probably throw in the pharisees at the time of jesus into the mix ....but they do not seem to learn do they? ...all it takes is for one "terrorist" as they would refer to them, to speak their mind, get the message public and a couple of years later they pay the price for offing them. I doubt it will be much different this time. funnily enough the only one who seems to be telling it like it is is farage!!...He'ers the new gospel! Nigel 3:74 And yeah, he doth speak unto the hypocrites,telling them,"I shalt not regard your unjust deeds", and verily sprang into verse, chastising them with his melody, Thus Nigel made utterance, "Our so-called leaders speak With words they try to jail you The subjugate the meek But it's the rhetoric of failure We are spirits in the material world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eight Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 "Our so-called leaders speak With words they try to jail you The subjugate the meek But it's the rhetoric of failure We are spirits in the material world A Sting in the tail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acidreign Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 What seems to be missed is the new and unknown faces of those who attend these meetings. I have read that Both Clinton & Obama attended prior to each of their respective presidencies and would be keen to find out if this information is true/false. If true, would make you think... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cica Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 The delegate list has been released for many years I think. Nothing suspicious about Bilderberg itself. It's just a symptom of the class structure we grant these people with our votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 The delegate list has been released for many years I think. Nothing suspicious about Bilderberg itself. It's just a symptom of the class structure we grant these people with our votes. yeah, we voted for all those business attendees. This is a lobbying meeting for the Rich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cica Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 yeah, we voted for all those business attendees. This is a lobbying meeting for the Rich. We give all the directors a shield of limited liability with their corporations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The XYY Man Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 If these people are here to serve us, why do they need such heavy protection from us? Exactly. And we pay for the "privilege". One question answers the whole riddle. Why is Mandelson there...? Answers on a postcard to: Because he's the Prince of Darkness competition PO Box 666 Hartlepool XYY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 We give all the directors a shield of limited liability with their corporations. Irrelevant....Lmited Liability is about Financial positions, not the power associated with the possession. Corparations can commit crimes and its Directors go to Jail as if they themselves had commited the crimes ( not bankers though...they are exempt) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnionTerror Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/shortcuts/2013/jun/07/bilderberg-cctv-camera-best-protest-costume I see Cameron is going to make an appearance... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNACR Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 What seems to be missed is the new and unknown faces of those who attend these meetings. I have read that Both Clinton & Obama attended prior to each of their respective presidencies and would be keen to find out if this information is true/false. If true, would make you think... Tony Blair never went, he was asked in parliament about it, and said he hadn't. Oh, wait, this is awkward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuggets Mahoney Posted June 7, 2013 Author Share Posted June 7, 2013 The delegate list has been released for many years I think. Nothing suspicious about Bilderberg itself. It's just a symptom of the class structure we grant these people with our votes. Only for people down to attend the full conference. The names of people who pop in for the day or a particular session don't get released. It's interesting how discussions about Bilderberg have progressed over the years. A decade or so ago you'd often be dismissed as a loon even for mentioning that such a gathering took place. The corporate press made no reference to the conference and has only started reporting its existence in response to the interest generated by the loons it attempts to marginalise, now and and in the past Now it's 'yeah, yeah, everyone knows about Bilderberg but it's nothing to be concerned about' And in another ten years ...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19 year mortgage 8itch Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 And in another ten years ...? bilderberg's got talent. (I bet that ******er Cowell is there) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuggets Mahoney Posted June 7, 2013 Author Share Posted June 7, 2013 bilderberg's got talent. (I bet that ******er Cowell is there) One of these would be more his cup of tea... British American Project Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference So many fruity little clubs and closet gatherings. So few days in the year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leroast Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 Surely the charitable status of the Goldman Sachs and BP funded Bilderberg Association is stretching the legal definitions ? According to the Charity Commission entry, the primary objective of the Charity is "public education in international affairs, economics and the social sciences". To meet this objective the Association "organises conferences and meetings...and publish[es] reports of such conferences and meetings" Not a word of truth there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(Blizzard) Posted June 8, 2013 Share Posted June 8, 2013 yeah, we voted for all those business attendees. This is a lobbying meeting for the Rich. Exactly. 'Oh don't be silly, we're not building a NWO. Were just an organization that arranges secret meetings between politicians and the extremely rich, where they discuss what changes they think should be imposed on billions of people, who aren't invited. We aren't a conspiracy!' Where's my invitation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.