nawibo Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 http://seekingalpha.com/article/56064-is-t...ver?source=feed In "Financial News: Banks Urge U.K. Clients To Stop Borrowing," Dow Jones Newswires reports that banks are apparently going cap-in-hand to clients begging them not to do what they are legally allowed to do. Banks have asked top U.K. corporate clients not to draw on lending facilities to which they are entitled in order to preserve their balance sheets as they approach the financial year end. The banks are urging some of their biggest clients not to draw on standby credit facilities as the sub-prime crisis and squeeze on interbank lending have affected banks' ability to fund themselves. The problems started with the closure of the commercial paper market as a means of cheap funding for companies in the summer. Banks have to provide standby financing of up to 100% to backstop commercial paper programs. With banks struggling for their sources of financing through the interbank market, the drawdowns are having a direct effect on their balance sheets. Several bankers have said Citigroup © is one of those most affected and that the bank was asking some clients not to use standby facilities, which are part of the normal relationship banking arrangements made between banks and companies. A Citigroup spokesman said: "Citigroup honors its commitments to its clients but, as part of our normal business, we discuss with clients the potential use of our balance sheet. This is standard industry practice." Simon Allocca, head of non-French corporate origination at BNP Paribas (BNPQY.PK), said: "By the end of the summer, the principal problem facing banks was not U.S. sub-prime or collateralized debt obligation exposure but the drawing down of standby loans and bilaterals. In some cases banks are seeking to avoid further balance sheet capital pressure by asking clients not to use their standby facilities." Standby financing is typically for 364 days and when undrawn has a zero risk weighting. When it is drawn, the risk weighting goes to 100%. This makes the sums involved significant. If a company is unable to tap the markets for commercial paper to the tune of, say, GBP4 billion (EUR5.6 billion), banks may have to provide that amount in standby financing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldfinger Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 (edited) From the companies' point of view it seems reasonable to borrow all they can, because: (1) They won't be able to next year. (2) There are better investments than Sterling. Edited December 3, 2007 by Goldfinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobthe~ Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 This is like It's a Wonderful Life for companies. Could we see a "wholesale" run on banks before we see a retail one? If I was a client, the first thing I would do is borrow that money and hang on to it, regardless of the rate, cos it sounds like I won't be able to soon. Or, ask what I would get in return if I didn't draw down the facility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marko Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 This makes me chuckle - banks are notorious for shafting whoever they can...and now they want clemency from the companies they lend to. If I had a standby facility with one, I would borrow all of it just to piss them off, or as bob said, I would see what they could offer me to not borrow - payback is, after all, a b1itch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extradry Martini Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 It is precisely this use of stand-by facilities that has triggered the crisis in the money markets. You can almost guage the quality of a press commentator or politician by whether he understands this point or whether he only talks about banks "not trusting each other". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinecu Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 http://seekingalpha.com/article/56064-is-t...ver?source=feedIn "Financial News: Banks Urge U.K. Clients To Stop Borrowing," Dow Jones Newswires reports that banks are apparently going cap-in-hand to clients begging them not to do what they are legally allowed to do. Banks have asked top U.K. corporate clients not to draw on lending facilities to which they are entitled in order to preserve their balance sheets as they approach the financial year end. The banks are urging some of their biggest clients not to draw on standby credit facilities as the sub-prime crisis and squeeze on interbank lending have affected banks' ability to fund themselves. The problems started with the closure of the commercial paper market as a means of cheap funding for companies in the summer. Banks have to provide standby financing of up to 100% to backstop commercial paper programs. With banks struggling for their sources of financing through the interbank market, the drawdowns are having a direct effect on their balance sheets. Several bankers have said Citigroup © is one of those most affected and that the bank was asking some clients not to use standby facilities, which are part of the normal relationship banking arrangements made between banks and companies. A Citigroup spokesman said: "Citigroup honors its commitments to its clients but, as part of our normal business, we discuss with clients the potential use of our balance sheet. This is standard industry practice." Simon Allocca, head of non-French corporate origination at BNP Paribas (BNPQY.PK), said: "By the end of the summer, the principal problem facing banks was not U.S. sub-prime or collateralized debt obligation exposure but the drawing down of standby loans and bilaterals. In some cases banks are seeking to avoid further balance sheet capital pressure by asking clients not to use their standby facilities." Standby financing is typically for 364 days and when undrawn has a zero risk weighting. When it is drawn, the risk weighting goes to 100%. This makes the sums involved significant. If a company is unable to tap the markets for commercial paper to the tune of, say, GBP4 billion (EUR5.6 billion), banks may have to provide that amount in standby financing Oh dear. Poor little banks Corporates clients would do well to change their bank to a more solvent one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realistbear Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 The jump in the Libor to 6.72 and lack of bank funding is like a hole being punctured in a space capsule in outer space. Everything gets sucked out. It will be interesting to see how many people are getting mortgages recently. Whatever Gordon tells Ali to tell Merv to do this Thursday will have little impact on the real cost of borrowing. The BoE are now out control, its all about credit now--or the dissappearance thereof. Very dangerous and unprecedented times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
council dweller Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 This is like It's a Wonderful Life for companies. Could we see a "wholesale" run on banks before we see a retail one? If I was a client, the first thing I would do is borrow that money and hang on to it, regardless of the rate, cos it sounds like I won't be able to soon. Or, ask what I would get in return if I didn't draw down the facility. I would have thought that companies borrow money because they need to, or am being naive here ? Surely they borrow to invest (in their own business hopefully) or due to some kind of cash flow issue. Are they asking companies to risk going out of business (or lower profits)in the short or long term in order to give a helping hand to banks? Personally if I give to charity I'll give to Oxfam or the cat protection league.Maybe I should consider giving to banks also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flapjack Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 No more free lunches then! lol This is an incredible news item - in effect asking customers not to buy!? Please don't come into our shop - we might go broke. This does happen to everyday businesses as well - it called 'overtrading' - the company takes on more orders than it can service. The result - cashflow problems. Can and does happen to small businesses but to an international bank - thats incredible!! Who was in control, doing risk assessments etc, company economists? accountants, auditors. All asleep or to busy building thier property empires!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TANSTAAFL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
margesimpson Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Personally if I give to charity I'll give to Oxfam or the cat protection league.Maybe I should consider giving to banks also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnlyMe Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 We don't need no stinking manufacturing. We don't need no stinking agriculture. All we need is a printing press and an idiot to run it day and night and pay for all our goods with IOU's. That pretty much encapsulates the last 10 years. Well it is payback time. flapjack "it called 'overtrading' " yes, anybody and I mean anybody who has run even the tiniest business out there has to get their heads around this concept It seems it is way way beyond the ken of the bankers and their overseers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Lorne Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Can and does happen to small businesses but to an international bank - thats incredible!! :ph34r:Who was in control, doing risk assessments etc, company economists? accountants, auditors. All asleep or to busy building thier property empires!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TANSTAAFL .....wo was in charge..? nowadays ..yes... company economists, accountants, auditors, salesmen, ex bond traders, marketing types.....everyone ..except Bankers..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crash2006 Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 (edited) Thats why house prices or assets will drop 40% in price money is pardon the term gold dust... i tired to point this out many times deflation on the extreme <---- have to hype it up some how Edited December 3, 2007 by crash2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pluto Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 We don't need no stinking manufacturing.We don't need no stinking agriculture. All we need is a printing press and an idiot to run it day and night and pay for all our goods with IOU's. That pretty much encapsulates the last 10 years. Well it is payback time. flapjack "it called 'overtrading' " yes, anybody and I mean anybody who has run even the tiniest business out there has to get their heads around this concept It seems it is way way beyond the ken of the bankers and their overseers. Yes, this sums the last ten years to a tee. My biggest fear is they will herd everyone into a war to create economic activity. I wished I would have saved Ken Livingstone's interview with the BBC about a year ago where he said, and I'm paraphrasing here: "we don't need manufacturing anymore as we have a new industry in the city of London where we are the best in the world". This was a video interview he did with them. This smarmy turd, I hope all those who suffer remember who promoted these follies and punish them well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishfinger Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Remember, a bank if for life not just for Christmas.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheer Heart Attack Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 This is, quite frankly, astonishing. Can anyone cite a precedent for this in the last 30 years? Can anyone involved in the higher end of banking or who has a great deal of knowledge therein explain how this could have occured? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yaakov Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 This is, quite frankly, astonishing.Can anyone cite a precedent for this in the last 30 years? Can anyone involved in the higher end of banking or who has a great deal of knowledge therein explain how this could have occured? yes, I'm curious about this too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 This is, quite frankly, astonishing.Can anyone cite a precedent for this in the last 30 years? Can anyone involved in the higher end of banking or who has a great deal of knowledge therein explain how this could have occured? dont need anyone high up to explain. its easy, Adn you thought mislaying 2 Cds was incompetant. How about 1.1trn dollars? Its gone, vanished disappeared. The Banks dont have enough capital to meet their legal capital reserve requirements. They need to keep cash in their coffers. A relative of mine with a POST OFFICE savings account just received a letter saying the maximum withdrawal from today for her account was £15,000 per day. They are shitting themselves because they KNOW there isnt enough money inthe world to bail them all out. :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoomBoom Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 My fear is that under the guise of some anti-terrorism law then government will make it increasingly dofficult to move significant amounts of money out of the banking system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintJay Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 I'd be quite interested to see what conditions these lending facilities have. With LIBOR rates sky-high there's a distinct possiblity you could borrow it from one back and put it on the money markets of another and make a profit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheer Heart Attack Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 dont need anyone high up to explain.its easy, Adn you thought mislaying 2 Cds was incompetant. How about 1.1trn dollars? Its gone, vanished disappeared. The Banks dont have enough capital to meet their legal capital reserve requirements. They need to keep cash in their coffers. A relative of mine with a POST OFFICE savings account just received a letter saying the maximum withdrawal from today for her account was £15,000 per day. They are shitting themselves because they KNOW there isnt enough money inthe world to bail them all out. :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: Thanks for that. So, the question is, how long until it can no longer be hidden and there are more runs on banks? I know that is a "how long is a piece of string" question, but guesses would be appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Thanks for that.So, the question is, how long until it can no longer be hidden and there are more runs on banks? I know that is a "how long is a piece of string" question, but guesses would be appreciated. I have absolutely no idea, but for the PO to limit daily transfers out to £15,000 means they know soemthing that we dont in my view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheer Heart Attack Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 I have absolutely no idea, but for the PO to limit daily transfers out to £15,000 means they know soemthing that we dont in my view. 'Scuse my ignorance, but what was it before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 'Scuse my ignorance, but what was it before? Ive just asked, and as far as she knew it was limited to the funds available, unlimited in her case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldfinger Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 A relative of mine with a POST OFFICE savings account just received a letter saying the maximum withdrawal from today for her account was £15,000 per day. Didn't this recently happen to Citi customers? I wonder who tells these banks that it might be a good idea to limit daily withdrawals. Is it an order from the top? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.