Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Gavyn Davies Again Urges The Government To Print Money


cht

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

Some Quotes From the Article.

Gordon Brown, meanwhile, is arguing very directly for fiscal activism, implying that he favours either tax cuts or public spending increases in the immediate future, financed by extra borrowing, to combat recession. On this, he appears to be in agreement with the incoming Obama administration, which is discussing a fiscal package worth more than $500 billion, or 3% of GDP, despite the fact that America's public finances are in worse shape than Britain's.

Translated into British terms, an Obama-style fiscal injection would require the chancellor to increase public spending or cut taxes by £45bn on Monday. That is £45bn a year, not £45bn spread over several years, which is the unhelpful manner in which the Treasury has expressed its policy changes in recent times. The prime minister's aides were apparently told by the Obama team in Washington last weekend that the Americans intend, after the inauguration, to fight a war on recession. They added that, as in a real war, they would apply General Colin Powell's famous dictum: "use overwhelming force".

Furthermore, it seems that they have the support of the Federal Reserve on this. Vice chairman Donald Kohn, who is often the annointed representative on earth for chairman Bernanke, said last week that the risk of deflation is now growing. He pointed out that the Fed has already started to print money to combat this threat, and suggested that it would do much more of this if necessary. Remember that we are listening here to the US Federal Reserve, one of the most admired institutions in the world, not the central bank of an emerging economy. And they are getting strong support for these unorthodox measures from many of the driest of free market economists in the US.

If the UK faces the certainty of recession and a growing fear of deflation then, as in America, the use of overwhelming force is the surest way of addressing this. Those who fear eventual inflation or a run on the pound have legitimate medium term concerns, but the Americans have decided across the political spectrum that they need urgently to fight depression, and that other problems can wait. The pre-budget report will tell us whether the British government agrees.

:blink::blink::blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1
HOLA442

This is the second time in a week that Davies, one of Gordons inner circle, and married to Brown's 'gatekeeper' Sue Nye has advocated the printing money route

No10 are definitely 'flying kites' on this issue, to see the markets and commentariat's reaction. This time round he's using Bernanke as cover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
This is the second time in a week that Davies, one of Gordons inner circle, and married to Brown's 'gatekeeper' Sue Nye has advocated the printing money route

No10 are definitely 'flying kites' on this issue, to see the markets and commentariat's reaction. This time round he's using Bernanke as cover

Agreed. Also Will Hutton has been saying the same for a couple of weeks. Suspect this was the real topic of conversation at the G20 junket and the reason everyone seemed so pissed at the Germans. Germany, understandably has an aversion to lax monetary policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444

I really do wish people would pay attention. Money printing, as strictly defined, are loans made by ones own central bank. I ASSUME they will try to fund spending through issuing government debt - which is still 1.5x over-subscribed and which is seeing renewed popularity - see the gilt story posted in the forum just recently. A 4.5% sterling yield isn't too shabby it seems...

Edited by AvidFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
I really do wish people would pay attention. Money printing, as strictly defined, are loans made by ones own central bank. I ASSUME they will try to fund spending through issuing government debt - which is still 1.5x over-subscribed and which is seeing renewed popularity - see the gilt story posted in the forum just recently. A 4.5% sterling yield isn't too shabby it seems...

i guess we will find out soon enough, however 4.5% of something that could devalue more before i get my 4.5% is a bad investment surely.....and they have been talking about direct monitisation by the way i.e. * just printing £50 notes etc...at least that was in the last article i read by this prat..*(his words not mine) this could all end up in an icelandic style admittance that sterings recent value is a function of our ponzi economy in operation, now that the ponzi has finally collapsed/been revealed and the likely long term effects calculated...guess what.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
I really do wish people would pay attention. Money printing, as strictly defined, are loans made by ones own central bank. I ASSUME they will try to fund spending through issuing government debt - which is still 1.5x over-subscribed and which is seeing renewed popularity - see the gilt story posted in the forum just recently. A 4.5% sterling yield isn't too shabby it seems...

Gavyn Davies writing in the Guardian: (We must start thinking like South American dictators)

An economy on the brink of deflation needs to jettison the orthodoxies of prudence - in favour of a licence to print money

This is where governments might need to be even more unorthodox. The tax cuts do not have to be financed by selling bonds. They can be financed by asking the Bank of England to offer an overdraft to the government, which is a polite way of saying by printing money. If you think about this as a process in which the central bank prints bank notes (essentially at zero cost) and gives them to the government to hand out in tax reductions, you would not be wrong in any meaningful way. This is a crazy and dangerous procedure when inflation is threatened - but it is the most powerful way of fighting deflation that economists have invented. Perhaps it will become necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
This is the second time in a week that Davies, one of Gordons inner circle, and married to Brown's 'gatekeeper' Sue Nye has advocated the printing money route

No10 are definitely 'flying kites' on this issue, to see the markets and commentariat's reaction. This time round he's using Bernanke as cover

they will have to print money no choice or masses out of work,,,we will be brainwashed into thinking printing money is good for us :(:unsure: :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449

So we don't have to worry about the inflationary effects of printing money if we have deflation then.

"In 1920, prices plummeted around the world in a great deflation. This price and wage deflation was reinforced by the economic policies of conservative governments. Germany's new Weimar Republic inherited the vast burden of debt and the crushing weight of reparations............by late 1923, the German government required 1,783 printing presses, running around the clock, to print money. Germans wheeled shopping carts filled with literally trillions of marks to pay for a single loaf of bread. Employees asked to be paid their wages each morning so that they could shop at noon before merchants posted the afternoon price rises."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
they will have to print money no choice or masses out of work,,,we will be brainwashed into thinking printing money is good for us :(:unsure: :angry:

hence the spoon feeding of anti deflation propaganda on mainstream news recently.

allowing the boom to bust is the only real way to get healthy growth back into the economy however that would result in a severe slump i.e. 10 years of hell on wheels.....

zanulabour indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
Gavyn Davies writing in the Guardian: (We must start thinking like South American dictators)

An economy on the brink of deflation needs to jettison the orthodoxies of prudence - in favour of a licence to print money

This is where governments might need to be even more unorthodox. The tax cuts do not have to be financed by selling bonds. They can be financed by asking the Bank of England to offer an overdraft to the government, which is a polite way of saying by printing money. If you think about this as a process in which the central bank prints bank notes (essentially at zero cost) and gives them to the government to hand out in tax reductions, you would not be wrong in any meaningful way. This is a crazy and dangerous procedure when inflation is threatened - but it is the most powerful way of fighting deflation that economists have invented. Perhaps it will become necessary.

Cheers for digging that up. When someone that close to Gordon makes such an explicit statement, you can assume it's on the government drawing board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412

the Fed one of the most 'admired' institutions in the world? hahaa

yeah ok, print more money, it wont make a difference and devaluing the pound further would be catastrophic, this will mean Zimbabwe style inflation in consumer goods.

Obama and the yanks are not economic geniuses, they have had their own stimulas and bailouts and its made bugger all difference like here. copying them would be a grave error

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413

I'm sub-consciously making a list of those sycophants to Gordon Brown who, if he survives for another couple of years, will magically be awarded peerages or other gongs on account of their "service" to journalism, Parliamentary Select Committees or civil service departments.

BTW, Mandelson's appointment to office without a public mandate (ie: not having been voted for) is a habit which, despite being prevalent in this government, is strictly speaking unconstitutional. But what the hell, that is fussy detail which is apparently very old fashioned and therefore irrelevant.

VP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414

Gavyn Davies -- or Gav - is a prize prat. A typical Nieu Labia Apparatchik beardy git [who can't shave properly]. He spends much time in the back garden at No: 10 doing a bit of uphill gardening with that one-eyed botty burglar, Gordon Broon. They have, between themselves and that other 'lifter Mendasciouson - totally destroyed the UK economy with their bent "economics".....

Edited by eric pebble
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
16
HOLA4417
17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
As far as I'm aware there's a clause in the Maastricht Treaty prohibiting it.

For the time being ... McStalin the saviour of the financial universe will no doubt have that rule top of his list to be rescinded ... *****.

Poor wording - ***** (Pr1ck) was directed at McStalin, not you Sinking.

Edited by lufc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
21
HOLA4422
How can you mock him so? Adam Smith and him were born in the same town.

:angry:

:lol:

One was the founder of Political Economy and registered for a degree at the age of 14 , Ph.D at the age of 18 and the other.........................

well enough has already been added in forums unbounded. :mellow:

apart from that pure geograhical coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423

Gavyn.Gavyn,Gavyn matey - you used to be so inciteful 15,20 years ago. Now you're nowt but a ZanuLab aparatchik bore.

Please sell one of your many houses and send the proceeds to feed the starving of Africa. That's about the maximum you could now contribute to anything. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information