Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Piketty Interviewed By Stephen Sackur On Hardtalk


R K

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443

Yeah, saw that a couple of nights ago.

He got stuck in a loop explaining why inequality is undesirable. Maybe it was the wrong question. But he gives good interview and cut across the forensic aggression.

It's good to see him interviewed. In some ways Hardtalk was perhaps the wrong format. I would like to see a longer interview conducted in a less combative style but it's better than nothing.

In so far as it's possible to put across a complex subject in brief sound bytes to a lay audience I thought he did pretty well. In particular his confirmation of capitalism but his concern that if the top take an increasing share of the wealth created in the economy then eventually they'll end up with 100% of the money was well expressed. Almost as good as the quote in my sig in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445

Not sure that was well expressed, his point on proportions over time. The hand gestures reminded me of Thatcher justifying trickle down/wealth effect policy: Once my right claw moves, my left claw must follow in a predictable way.

That's where he got stuck in a loop. I haven't watched it again, so I may be mistaken.

No criticism of the interviewer - interruption of a line of thought is irritating, but if it's a good line it will carry on to the end, which Picketty showed.

We're in an emergency, like breaking out of an egg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
6
HOLA447

It's good to see him interviewed. In some ways Hardtalk was perhaps the wrong format. I would like to see a longer interview conducted in a less combative style but it's better than nothing.

In so far as it's possible to put across a complex subject in brief sound bytes to a lay audience I thought he did pretty well. In particular his confirmation of capitalism but his concern that if the top take an increasing share of the wealth created in the economy then eventually they'll end up with 100% of the money was well expressed. Almost as good as the quote in my sig in fact.

The problem with capitalism is that eventually bankers end up with everyone else's money. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448

The problem with capitalism is that eventually bankers end up with everyone else's money. :P

But oddly the banks don't. It was inequality that bankrupted the banks not lose lending as such. With the banks liability's to a small elite and the majority not having access to that money the elite held in their accounts debt become unpayable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449

It's simple.

The evangelists for capitalism -- the bankers -- messed up big time. Instead of living by their own doctrine, they threw a hissy fit and demanded to be bailed out or they would collapse the economy.

The Government (i.e. their friends) gave in and everyone else was made to pay for their greed. Those that paid grumbled a bit, but paid anyway.

Everything continues as before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412

This episode will be available soon

So it can be specially edited out by the censor like the Question Time episodes when a member of the audience comes out with remarkable sense :P

Edited by aSecureTenant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414
14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
16
HOLA4417

Yes well.....so the rich are getting richer. Who knew?

So the problem is that the rich can never quite get rich enough, they always want 25% more. Always.

What to do?

The answer is to make the poor poorer, it will of course make the rich feel better about themselves.

Sorted,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418

It's simple.

The evangelists for capitalism -- the bankers -- messed up big time. Instead of living by their own doctrine, they threw a hissy fit and demanded to be bailed out or they would collapse the economy.

AND NOBODY GOT ANGRY ABOUT IT!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419

It's simple.

The evangelists for capitalism -- the bankers -- messed up big time. Instead of living by their own doctrine, they threw a hissy fit and demanded to be bailed out or they would collapse the economy.

Yes it turned out that the bankers were closet socialists- who knew? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information