oracle Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 On 13/04/2017 at 6:29 PM, interestrateripoff said: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-39588876 Assad claims it was all faked. Trump makes allegations repeatedly about fake news. Whilst this thread is not specifically about Syria, who should one believe in a world full of fake news. The world seems awash with it and you have no idea what the truth is! Although is that the aim to keep everyone divided. Its as if the conspiracy nut jobs are now running the news channels. well i think russian intelligence source conclusion is probably right. they're saying that it wasn't actually a direct chemical attack by anybody, but the chemical weapons went off when the suspected arms depot was bombed.I think we're likely to see more of these,and maybe one that REALLY goes BOOM. question is, weren't all of these things supposed to be handed in back in 2011 when russia/UN go assad to hand over his stockpile? they aren't supposed to be there now are they?.....did assad not declare everything??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happy_renting Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 The story a few days ago about the couple who discovered they were biological twins during IVF treatment was a fake news story from a fake online paper repeating the same story from another fake online paper from a year ago. That didn't stop the Daily Mail, Metro, the Mirror, and the Evening Standard publishing the story without doing even the most basic checks to verify it or it's source. The Mirror now says ''Evidence suggests the 'Mississippi Herald' is not a legitimate news outlet'. I'd say the episode proves that the Daily Mail, Metro, Mirror and Evening Standard are not a legitimate news outlets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybong Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 On 4/17/2017 at 7:53 PM, Maynardgravy said: It's not 'problem, reaction, solution ' any longer. That disappeared with 9/11. The reaction to supposed wmd's in Iraq was a march against war. Just ignored. So now you're left with 'problem, solution'. The only reaction you'll see reported is from useful idiot politicians whose only talent appears to be be how much faeces they can swallow. pretty soon it will just be solution. If the problem is just invented and made up (and without a credible and transparent investigation it seemingly is all just invented and made up) then it already is just solution - aka might is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turned Out Nice Again Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 There are no authoritative media. You need a broad portfolio of sources and to take each with pinch of salt according to its agenda. "Objective Truth" if it exists at all is to be found in the overlaps ... between BBC & RT, Guardian & Mail, Searchlight & Stormfront etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Eagle Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 MSNBC anchor declares it the media’s job to ‘control exactly what people think’ https://www.rt.com/viral/378300-msnbc-media-controls-thoughts/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happy_renting Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 How a spoof news website has regularly been taken seriously by lazy and gullible MSM journalists:- http://southendnewsnetwork.com/actualnews/heres-a-list-of-everyone-who-has-been-fooled-by-southend-news-network/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austin Allegro Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I believe part of the outcry about 'fake news' is because news sources don't want their click-bait currency devalued. If people start assuming all online news is fake, they won't bother clicking on things and advertising revenue will go down, or, people will gravitate to the websites that have the most ridiculous fake news stories, taking revenue away from less mercenary sites. Of course, a lot of it is because governments and media want to control what we believe. The cry of 'fake news!' is similar to 'counter revolutionary!' in Stalin's Russia. I realised the BBC were peddling fake news in 2015 because they kept banging on about poor refugees, think of the children etc but even with their best efforts they couldn't muster footage of more than a tiny handful of women and children among huge groups of men, which meant it was highly likely there was something else going on that they were trying to hide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Automotive Engineer Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 6 hours ago, Austin Allegro said: I believe part of the outcry about 'fake news' is because news sources don't want their click-bait currency devalued. If people start assuming all online news is fake, they won't bother clicking on things and advertising revenue will go down, or, people will gravitate to the websites that have the most ridiculous fake news stories, taking revenue away from less mercenary sites. Of course, a lot of it is because governments and media want to control what we believe. The cry of 'fake news!' is similar to 'counter revolutionary!' in Stalin's Russia. I realised the BBC were peddling fake news in 2015 because they kept banging on about poor refugees, think of the children etc but even with their best efforts they couldn't muster footage of more than a tiny handful of women and children among huge groups of men, which meant it was highly likely there was something else going on that they were trying to hide. remember the syrian toddler dead on a turkish beach? its imposible not to, it was plastered evrywhere remember the dead girl in the Nice truck-of-peace attack? most likely not because that wasn't shown (blanket over the top) now ask yourself why show one and not the other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austin Allegro Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 13 hours ago, Automotive Engineer said: remember the syrian toddler dead on a turkish beach? its imposible not to, it was plastered evrywhere remember the dead girl in the Nice truck-of-peace attack? most likely not because that wasn't shown (blanket over the top) now ask yourself why show one and not the other? Most likely because capitalist globalists want to flood Europe with immigrants from north Africa and the near east to keep labour prices cheap, boost tax income and provide more consumers. They are in an unholy alliance with marxists who want to dilute or even destroy western Christian civilization, and their 'useful idiots', the soft-hearted centre-leftists (BBC, Lily Allen etc) who think we can somehow solve the problems of the world's trouble spots by wholesale importation of their populations. The globalists don't care about any consequences because they live in a supra-national bubble and their wealth insulates them from any consequent problems. Add to this the machinations of Islamists (probably mostly Saudis) who want to further the spread of global Islam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbonic Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 14 hours ago, Automotive Engineer said: remember the syrian toddler dead on a turkish beach? its imposible not to, it was plastered evrywhere remember the dead girl in the Nice truck-of-peace attack? most likely not because that wasn't shown (blanket over the top) now ask yourself why show one and not the other? Or the dismembered 10 y.o.girl in the truck attack in Sweden a few short weeks ago. It didn't fit the MSM narrative, so got very little coverage. Meanwhile, on YouTube a guest speaker on Sargon's channel, an experienced and award winning new media journalist, explains why fake stories get mindlessly repeated by the MSM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Eagle Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.