Bruce Banner Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Hovis Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Yes, bit effing rich from the slow golfer living in the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 I can't stand either of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sPinwheel Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Lightweight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Eagle Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Do you mind sharing with us what this is about? Some of us don't have a TV or telepathic skills to know what you are referring to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Hovis Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Do you mind sharing with us what this is about? Some of us don't have a TV or telepathic skills to know what you are referring to. He said Britain and France let Libya descend into anarchy because they have a short attention span. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 You could try putting the thread title into Google. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Eagle Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 He said Britain and France let Libya descend into anarchy because they have a short attention span. Cheers, Obumma's attention span must be even shorter then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shindigger Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Erm.... And then theres the whole Benghazi email thing. Thin ice Barack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XswampyX Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybong Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 He said 'free riders aggravate me' in the talks with Mr Cameron, and told him: 'You have to pay your fair share.' Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3485830/Barack-Obama-warned-David-Cameron-destroy-special-relationship-did-not-boost-defence-spending-free-riders-aggravate-me.html#ixzz42YJ9yatQ Where to begin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Sadman Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 I get the impression Obama couldnt care less about foreign policy, he's left most of it to Hillary (oh dear) He's had two main aims as president 1) Health Reform 2) Gun laws Both of which he's failed miserably on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XswampyX Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 3) Golf (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained records from the U.S. Department of the Air Force revealing that Barack Obama and family had a busy 2015 vacationing on the American taxpayers’ dime. The unnecessary travel included an Obama Palm Springs golf trip in June, a trip to New York City in July and a family trip to Martha’s Vineyard in August – all of which cost taxpayers $3,115,688.70 in travel expenses alone. WTF! Source :- http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-president-obamas-2015-golf-and-family-vacation-trips-cost-taxpayers-3115688-70-in-travel-expenses-alone/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 I get the impression Obama couldnt care less about foreign policy, he's left most of it to Hillary (oh dear) He's had two main aims as president 1) Health Reform 2) Gun laws Both of which he's failed miserably on. And Guantanamo. He was promising to close it before he even came to office. Totally inept. Total failure. Abject cretin of the highest order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Sadman Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 And Guantanamo. He was promising to close it before he even came to office. Totally inept. Total failure. Abject cretin of the highest order. Yup. I can understand due to their system of only one arm of govt being able to initiate laws, and another only having the ability to pass them, Obama's timeframe for 'HOPE' and 'CHANGE' TM was thus limited. Nonetheless the Democrats did control all 3 arms of government for 2 years between 2008-2010. If Obama was worth his salt he would have achieved his hopey changy stuff then. Reagan managed to achieve most his stuff without the GOP controlling the house. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Combined--Control_of_the_U.S._House_of_Representatives_-_Control_of_the_U.S._Senate.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 And Guantanamo. He was promising to close it before he even came to office. Totally inept. Total failure. Abject cretin of the highest order. and he's not that black to be a black president. I thought this thread was another about Pigs Heads....and I was right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Errol Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 Yup. I can understand due to their system of only one arm of govt being able to initiate laws, and another only having the ability to pass them, Obama's timeframe for 'HOPE' and 'CHANGE' TM was thus limited. Nonetheless the Democrats did control all 3 arms of government for 2 years between 2008-2010. If Obama was worth his salt he would have achieved his hopey changy stuff then. Reagan managed to achieve most his stuff without the GOP controlling the house. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Combined--Control_of_the_U.S._House_of_Representatives_-_Control_of_the_U.S._Senate.png He's the Commander in Chief. If Guantanamo is a military installation he could just have issued a direct order to his Chief of Staff to shut it down. At once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormymonday_2011 Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 He said Britain and France let Libya descend into anarchy because they have a short attention span.This would be the U.S. government that at regular intervals has dragged compliant British administrations into successive unwinnable conflicts that have cost the UK taxpayer billions and taken the lives of hundreds of British military personnel. An effort by the way for which we get no thanks but just constant sniping about how useless we are. To be honest the reluctance of Parliament to get involved any further such ventures is understandable particularly as apart from the French the rest of Europe including the Germans singularly refuse to make more than token commitments.BTW Anyone who thinks we stepped back too quickly from Libya would do well to read the thread on ARRSE about what 'ongoing commitment' meant in Afghanistan http://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/worse-than-a-defeat.223398/page-25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.