Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
88Crash

No Wonder People Are Still Buying

Recommended Posts

The current reporting by most media and the press releases seems somewhere between disingenuous, misleading or maybe just total b*llocks!

One of the latest quotes from HBOS about negative equity for example

“In 1992, 34 per cent of borrowers had loans-to-value of more than 90 per cent”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/pro...icle4438949.ece

It doesn’t matter if the reporting is about price falls, negative equity, unemployment or interest rates, they all seem to have the same mantra

“Compared to the HPC in the 90’s”

They compare figures from an entire HPC that lasted several years to our current HPC that has lasted several months

This HPC is only just beginning, so to compare the plight of people in negative equity today, compared to the same figure in 1992 is simply wrong

Try that figure two years from now and that would e a fair comparable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The more blaintant lies the BBC puts out the better as far to many people have not made the connection between the BBC and goverment paopaganda machine.

I'm still looking for WMD in Iraq :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The current reporting by most media and the press releases seems somewhere between disingenuous, misleading or maybe just total b*llocks!

One of the latest quotes from HBOS about negative equity for example

“In 1992, 34 per cent of borrowers had loans-to-value of more than 90 per cent”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/pro...icle4438949.ece

It doesn’t matter if the reporting is about price falls, negative equity, unemployment or interest rates, they all seem to have the same mantra

“Compared to the HPC in the 90’s”

They compare figures from an entire HPC that lasted several years to our current HPC that has lasted several months

This HPC is only just beginning, so to compare the plight of people in negative equity today, compared to the same figure in 1992 is simply wrong

Try that figure two years from now and that would e a fair comparable

Its spin. Its like this.. Ok house prices are down YOY but look at the prices 2 and 3 years ago, they are still up. Give it a few months and it will be.. Ok house prices are down YOY and but look at 3 years ago, they are still up.

Neglect to mention prices from 2 years ago. When they go negative on 3 years they will start quoting 4 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why use the 1992 figure? The crash was over two years in at that point and therefore the LTV's would be increased in line with the 2-years of drops already taken place.

A fair comparison to today would be with the figures for 1990.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why use the 1992 figure? The crash was over two years in at that point and therefore the LTV's would be increased in line with the 2-years of drops already taken place.

A fair comparison to today would be with the figures for 1990.

the correction we've seen inside ten months is already greater than in the 90's and the trend is apocalyptic in comparison. For now comparing a six month loss with a three year one works for the talking heads on BBC etc. Inside the next 4 months it won't as the comparison will be too stark to use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its spin. Its like this.. Ok house prices are down YOY but look at the prices 2 and 3 years ago, they are still up.

Just wait until they start using '92 prices as a frame of reference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other little item they forget to mention when talking about '92 is the massive levels of personal debt individuals now have - that they didn't then. That makes today's situation even more dangerous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in 1992, more people had endowment mortgages, so the LTV would have appeared to be high ( 90-100% ) for a lot of people, but in reality they also had an endowment policy that should have acted as a repayment vehicle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The current reporting by most media and the press releases seems somewhere between disingenuous, misleading or maybe just total b*llocks!

One of the latest quotes from HBOS about negative equity for example

“In 1992, 34 per cent of borrowers had loans-to-value of more than 90 per cent”

Yes, but how many had loans of 125% ltv or 6 billion times wages

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 395 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.