Dave Spart Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 She won't be winning it again and she'll have to live with that fact. On a slightly different subject, remember that thug Michael Carroll that won £9million? Its when people like that win you realise how unfair life can be. I say that because I was recently talking to an engineeer with a brilliant idea for a CO2 emissions reduction device. He was struggling to raise finance yet people like this young woman and Carroll squander their winnings when they could be investing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DementedTuna Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 She should quit whining, she's still got £180,000 in the house. I'm the same age as her and don't have that, but don't feel the need to make suicide attempts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pl1 Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 I'd still pork her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingsgate Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Chavscum. She had all that dosh as an opening wedge to do so much, and she's p1ssed it away. I wish I had won that kind of money at aged 16! Still, she's not that bad looking she can always do some stripping or whoring for more easy money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatcherschild Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Don't concern yourself, pal. Mr. Happy there likes to draw his own (usually illogical) conclusions from member posts then argue against them.Basically he's not very bright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatcherschild Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Now, now.What he I suspect means, is that there is a certain section of society, which no matter how much money and opportunity they are given, will always revert to type. I like to think of it as Darwin's theory playing itself out in glorious technicolour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.C. Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 I like to think of it as Darwin's theory playing itself out in glorious technicolour She got herself knocked up. She is one of Darwin's winners, unlike the middle class career woman who reaches 35 and realises she is now barren and can't fulfill her sole purpose in life. If you want to play the Darwin card, at least get it right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinker Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 She won't be winning it again and she'll have to live with that fact.On a slightly different subject, remember that thug Michael Carroll that won £9million? Its when people like that win you realise how unfair life can be. I say that because I was recently talking to an engineeer with a brilliant idea for a CO2 emissions reduction device. He was struggling to raise finance yet people like this young woman and Carroll squander their winnings when they could be investing it. Not being flippant but it is a lottery I'm afraid. There probably are some winners who have done good things - not the kind of things likely to sell papers though, and probably not done by attention seekers. I'd love to come into a lot of money and do good things but 14,000,000 to 1 is a bit of a long shot. I might even organise a HPC party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pyracantha Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Chavscum. She had all that dosh as an opening wedge to do so much, and she's p1ssed it away.I wish I had won that kind of money at aged 16! Still, she's not that bad looking she can always do some stripping or whoring for more easy money. http://images.google.ie/imgres?imgurl=http...sa%3DN%26um%3D1 Just to keep you going. Personally, as boob jobs go I'm not that impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mammon Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Sadly due to inflation and high cost of living, £1.8 million is not alot of money anymore, as it wont last you a lifetime. She had a chance with 10 million. But not with 1.8. Im suprised it lasted as long as it did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Professor Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 She got herself knocked up.She is one of Darwin's winners, unlike the middle class career woman who reaches 35 and realises she is now barren and can't fulfill her sole purpose in life. There's a film (Idiocracy) based on this very concept of perverse natural selection - that more intelligent women tend to put off having children until it's too late, wheras the chavscum breed like rabbits, basically kicking evolution into reverse gear and leading to a world populated by mental subtards addicted to trashy TV, soft drinks and advertising. The film was sh1te though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNACR Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 I like to think of it as Darwin's theory playing itself out in glorious technicolour Perhaps Richard Dawkins might like to provide the narration. Although, on the whether or not there's a god front, this case is a bit borderline TBH. She got herself knocked up.She is one of Darwin's winners, unlike the middle class career woman who reaches 35 and realises she is now barren and can't fulfill her sole purpose in life. If you want to play the Darwin card, at least get it right I think you'll find that being the youngest ever woman to make partner at some long since merged and forgotten law firm will more than make up for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.C. Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 I think you'll find that being the youngest ever woman to make partner at some long since merged and forgotten law firm will more than make up for it. Not really. You represent many hundreds of million years of parentage where each generation has survived to reproductive age and successfully raised offspring, until you. Doesn't matter how much you earn, your DNA has now been removed from the gene pool. Fail. PS, were you being sarcastic? It's late sorry... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNACR Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Not really.You represent many hundreds of million years of parentage where each generation has survived to reproductive age and successfully raised offspring, until you. Doesn't matter how much you earn, your DNA has now been removed from the gene pool. Fail. PS, were you being sarcastic? It's late sorry... Of course I f*cking was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.C. Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Of course I f*cking was. Can't find a blushing emoticon or doh I'm an idiot one... Mebe time for bed then.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.