Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Aidan Ap Word

Members
  • Posts

    1,136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Aidan Ap Word

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

3,028 profile views
  1. Though it is unclear what this means in the very long term for salaries - unknowns include how the labour market power is could now be diluted further (an employee in one place now competes with a larger group of people in some cases), unknowns include what corporates will spend the "extra money" they might have on with them not paying large commercial rents, and then inflation/deflation/social change in other ways will interact with as ever ... so over 10 to 15 years I am not sure if this will raise or lower people's disposable income as a proportion of their wages ... But what I can see is that - for many people (not everyone) - WFH more really could involve higher quality of life. Ad that to the lower physical risk of not leaving the building you live in every day ... hmmm ... there are lots of secondary industries that depend on the commuter lifestyle ... this is going to be very painful for some ... even if the "pendulum" swings back.
  2. Agree. Please don't let their machinations add to your stress. They are after gold-digging as best they can, and it would be exceptionally rare if they gie any thought for you or your situation in all this. If they want to break your quiet enjoyment of the property before your tenancy formally ends then wait for them to do so in writing. And then throw the book at them ... You will have to move at some point, but doing so after being rushed by someone is really stressful and very expensive for you. Oops - like another poster said - really wish you didn't have to go through this!
  3. The landlord has a responibility to know the law. This doesn't appear to be the case (lack of deposit protection, lack of knowledge of increased notice periods at this time, and more).
  4. Its the 24.99 GBP Argos rug in the blue 'TV room' that also 'adorns' my children's bedroom that makes me think I have joined the rich&famous (at least in terms of my furnishings' style) ... except .... um ... no.
  5. What I am saying is: the total stock of gold is nowhere near the levels of fake money "resgistered" in the wider system. Any discussions about recycling levels and amounts of gold in electronics (etc etc) is largely irrelevant. Because there just isn't that much gold in the whole world until it magically jumps in price by several orders of magnitude ... until *then* it will be little other an an "extra" item of interest on the boudnaries of all the debt spewed by the ECB(s) of the world. And if the gold price does indeed jump to those levels (100s or 10s of thousands higher than currently) all sorts of other things would change in the world.
  6. So that's +-8000 tons in electronic and electrical devices annualy that you allege is "destroyed" or somehow (silently) being siphoned off by Russian oligarchs? That, frankly, would be a pretty dumb way to (if you will excuse the irony) "sink" their ill-gotten gains. And it would take a very very very long time since most electonics stay in circulation for between 3 and 10 years. The US national debt represents more or less 454 600 tons, or more than 56 times as much of the annual "consumption" of gold in electronics world wide. If you could syphon off (even) 10% of that gold it would take 560 years to get to an amount of gold even close to what the US national debt is in 2019/2020. Here's a point: electronics and it's widespread use in electronics hasn't even been around (at today's rate) for anything much more than 30 years ... and a *lot* of work is being done to minimise the need for more (dust-collecting/unused boards, chips, memory, batteries) [hint: it's called virtual machines and time slicing] ... so I can't see how you could think there is anywhere near as much gold in all the electronics we have ever used in the last 100 years. Heck, mainstream use of electricity (let alone gold-'consuming' electronics) is irrelevant beyond say 1925 (approx when half of US homes had electricity). If you think geology is as inexact a study as to make your point relevant than I truly believe you underestimate (even insult) the whole discipline and everyone dedicated to that work. And you don't address 1 key point: all the gold you claim is being ferreted away would take up a lot of space and be very difficult to move - and, probably more importantly, be very very visible. So it all boils down to 1 question: Where is this gold you claim is spread all over the world? Gold has mass, and it takes up space, and it cannot be replicated the way a row in a database can. The laws of physics are a hard task master when validating thinking.
  7. Inside what you so gibly respoinded to is my view: So back to my point: The relevance of gold in terms of responding to (or even just understanding) global debt - or even just the US debt pile - is extremely limited. Even if I was off by a factor of 10 - that's 15 years of *global* gold *production* - just to pay the US debt back. And assuming the persons/organisations to whom the debt is owed (a dubious idea in the first place) actually want all that physical stuff that they then have to store securely ... You suggest that no one knows how much gold there is out there? Are you serious? Yeah, like geologists haven't been studying that for years. And if there was a lot more gold "out there" (in terms of what we could reap from the earth) then gold would be worth less anyway. Gold mining is a big, loud, energy intensive and dangerous job. We know eactly how much gold we extract year by year.
  8. current us national debt (USD): 24.95 trillion. 1 US ton of gold curreently priced at about 55 million USD. That's approximately 454600 tons of gold. For perspective ont his: Global extraction of gold is about 3200 tons every year. In other words to cover (just) the US national debt with gold you would have to spend 142 years extracting gold from the earth and using it for nothing other than paying down the debt. Which would be physically possible assuming 0% inflation for 1 and a half centuries. And assuming you didn't ever need gold for anything else. Or, to put it another way, that's an awful lot of oligarch's boats to hide all this stuff in. If each oligarch had 10 tons hidden in their boats - how many boats would you need to hide a "significant" amount of gold? Oh yeah, and boats sink. From this visualization ... a very rough calculation of the world's gold reserves (admitedly the publicly declared stocks) is about 25 000 tons ... or slightly more than 1/20th of the gold required to pay back the debt ...: For your point to be relevant on a global economic stage you would need significantly more than this amount in "hidden" spaces ...
  9. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/knowledgebank/how-much-gold-is-kept-in-the-bank-of-england 200 billion in gold is not "a lot of gold" - relative to the wider economy. Logic fail. Please go gold bug somewhere else.
  10. Good challenges. What Locke doesn't get is even if government is upheld by violoence (or the threat of violence) it is, at least, not as violent as the complete absence of government. Locke's view of a government-less world as a better world hasn;t been properly tested. But what has been tested is what the world would be like without government. Home schooling. 'Nuff said.
  11. And it seems to me sensible to worry about currency risk when sloshing money around at unprecedented speed. But when the other currencies are sloshing money around as fast (or faster) then local currency risk is lower, surely? If all the children on the playground are stealing each other's lunch, the probability of getting caught stealing your classmates lunch is much smaller. As long as you aren't the one caught and punished when the fashion for stealing lunches ends ... like the last person into a Ponzi scheme pays all the price.
  12. House prices are closely tied to affordability which is a mix of steady income and the cost of debt. The cost of debt is near zero - even cost of saving (negative interest rates) rears its head. I suspect much of this is about how unemployment jumps (or not).
  13. This has to be - IMO - one of the biggest questions in all this, if not the biggest.
  14. Bruce, Yeah, Belgium - being a part of the EU were - amazingly and miraculously rescued by their membership of a large conglomerate of autocratic and unrepresentative groups (the EU). This is fact, yes. Definitely. Ah no, wait - let's look at the evidence: Using basic metrics like this is hardly the whole picture ... but Belgium are significantly worse off - more so than could be explained by demographic or sociological differences. Stop trying to conflate a global event with a regional one issue ... it is, at best, a very weak argument ... and truth is it make people who obsess about ignoring democracy (like those who re determined to bang the drum for remaining in the EU) look like they are quite short on the logic skills. And when you have the wherewithall to understand the difference between nominal figures and proportions you find that the UK is not - as the mainstream media tout - significantly worse of than the Spanish or Italian experiences - and certianly not more so than the Belgian one. For 1 thing: Italian hospitals (in specific locales) ran out of capacity, the UK ones did not. And there are a lot of other ways in which this has played out differently for different countries whether they are in the EU or not.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.