SMAC67 Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Cause and effect, maybe if we didn't have such a corrupt financial and economic system people wouldn't be driven to acts of terror. I notice you haven't mentioned any of the 1000's of people who have since been murdered in the name of retribution. Killing people is good, you must love the modern world? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebob Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Yeah, I bet all the people jumping out of windows in the twin towers were thinking Muslim terrorists are harmless, the people we really need to worry about are bankers!And there is a good argument to be made that the current boom and now bust was caused indirectly by 9/11. I do not know what people were thinking as they jumped out of the windows when the twin towers were hit by planes. Whoever organised that incredibly sophisticated attack has a lot to answer for. No evidence produced by the previous US administration, as to who is responsible. Despite many foreign intelligence services offering much evidence. Wonder why... I for one disbelieve much of what I read in the mainstream press, as most of it is little more than propoganda these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotus eater Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Nice try Al Qaeda! You're right...there are loads of their kind (AQ or similar) posting/planting statements on Muslim victimhood on various sites that have nothing to do with the site in question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Game_Over Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 I do not know what people were thinking as they jumped out of the windows when the twin towers were hit by planes. Whoever organised that incredibly sophisticated attack has a lot to answer for. No evidence produced by the previous US administration, as to who is responsible. Despite many foreign intelligence services offering much evidence. Wonder why... I for one disbelieve much of what I read in the mainstream press, as most of it is little more than propoganda these days. Yeah it was defenitely Mossand and the CIA who organised it. Denial, denial, denial. And if a 'dirty' bomb is detonated in London, that will probably be the government trying to take people's minds of the economic crisis. FFS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PopGun Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 furthermore, if there is suspicion of a terrorist attack then I would rather people were arrested and released than allowed to do the crime and be arrested afterwards Look in a mirror and say that again.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Game_Over Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Cause and effect, maybe if we didn't have such a corrupt financial and economic system people wouldn't be driven to acts of terror. I notice you haven't mentioned any of the 1000's of people who have since been murdered in the name of retribution. Killing people is good, you must love the modern world? I am not against killing people Per Se What I object to is OUR governmet making it easier for THEM to kill US. Seems logical to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinking Feeling Posted April 10, 2009 Author Share Posted April 10, 2009 I do not know what people were thinking as they jumped out of the windows when the twin towers were hit by planes. Whoever organised that incredibly sophisticated attack has a lot to answer for. No evidence produced by the previous US administration, as to who is responsible. Despite many foreign intelligence services offering much evidence. Wonder why... I for one disbelieve much of what I read in the mainstream press, as most of it is little more than propoganda these days. Sometimes it's worth looking at old articles for evidence: Explosive used in bombs 'was of military origin' The bombs used in Thursday's terrorist attacks were of "military origin", according to a senior French policeman sent to London to help in what has become the biggest criminal investigation in British history. Christophe Chaboud, head of the French Anti-Terrorism Co-ordination Unit, told Le Monde newspaper that the explosives used in the bombings were of "military origin", which he described as "very worrying". " We're more used to cells making home-made explosives with chemicals," he said. "How did they get them? Either by trafficking, for example, in the Balkans, or they had someone on the inside who enabled them to get out of the military establishment." He added that the victims' wounds suggested that the explosives, which were "not heavy but powerful", had been placed on the ground, perhaps underneath seats. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime...gin-498495.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PopGun Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Actually, no, the question everyone is asking is why on earth do we need so many Pakistanis in our country? Why? It doesn't make sense. Britain is full, overcrowded, and with diminishing opportunities for our own people. Pakistan is a backwards religion-dominated unstable 3rd world disaster. Britain is an Anglo Saxon island on teh edge of Europe. There is no natural connection between Pakistan and Britain. During WW2, German citizens were rounded up and interred. We know there are Pakistani terrorist cells in the UK... one student is arrested and then freed, and you have the damned cheek to post a thread whinging about the poor little dear. Get a life. another brainwashed idiot. Stick to heat magazine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotus eater Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 another brainwashed idiot. Stick to heat magazine. I think you mean 'brain dead'....check out his previous posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMAC67 Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 I am not against killing people Per SeWhat I object to is OUR governmet making it easier for THEM to kill US. Seems logical to me. I see, death to anyone who is not YOU, on whatever spurious grounds you say. Who is THEM and who is US? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PopGun Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 (edited) I think you mean 'brain dead'....check out his previous posts. Well to be fair, should these Asian guys actually get convicted with any Terror charges that stick, they'll be the first ones SINCE the laws were passed in 2001. Previous form doesn't make this likely. Edited April 10, 2009 by PopGun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Game_Over Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 I see, death to anyone who is not YOU, on whatever spurious grounds you say.Who is THEM and who is US? It is obvious to THEM And it is obvious to ME If it isn't obvious to YOU Then I suggest you give up trying to understand anything that is happening in the World And I believe in live and let live as a general principle However, if someone wants to kill me and mine, it seems obvious that it is a good idea to get them before they get us. Perhaps you could explain why a British citizen blows themselves up killing other British citizens because they don't like something the British government did? BTW I don't expect a sensible answer, because there isn't one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete.hpc Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Britain is full, overcrowded Pakistanis fight for space in crowded England, yesterday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebob Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Adolf Hitler and the Nazis weren't representative of the German people eitherBut 6 million people got gassed Pol Pot and the Kymer Rouge weren't representative of the Cambodian people either, but millions died What is your point exactly? 4 edited to 6 for accuracy. That 6 million figure is extremely controversial with many christians disbelieving it. Not disbelieving that horrific events occurred, but 6 million gassed? I do not think so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotus eater Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 That 6 million figure is extremely controversial with many christians disbelieving it. Not disbelieving that horrific events occurred, but 6 million gassed? I do not think so Got primary evidence then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kittingerjump Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Previous form doesn't make this likely. +1 to common sense and the well informed. Everyones an expert don't you know... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PopGun Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 That 6 million figure is extremely controversial with many christians disbelieving it. Not disbelieving that horrific events occurred, but 6 million gassed? I do not think so Steady now, talk like that could get you barred from Austria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Game_Over Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Well to be fair, should these Asian guys actually get convicted with any Terror charges that stick, they'll be the first ones SINCE the laws were passed in 2001. Previous form doesn't make this likely. The very obvious problem with terrorists is that they are effectively innocent until they commit the crime And then it is too late to do anything about it. Our current ultra liberal legal system is unable to cope with this situation But if this problem is not addressed, eventually there will be a backlash And we will end up with a government that will devise a solution. The problem with Liberalism is that the road to Hell is paved with good intentions And we are currently heading down that road at high speed IMO It's 1930 again and the clock is ticking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebob Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Got primary evidence then? Have your kind got priamary evidence that 6 million did die? If so provide the evidence. The more your kind stifle debate on this single fact, the greater the suspicion of your motives, whilst pretending that you are defending democracy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juvenal Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Unfortunately there is a very small minority intent on killing as many non-believers as possible. That is a fact that can't be denied and anyone who tries to deny it is very very stupid. Plus 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebob Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Steady now, talk like that could get you barred from Austria. Of course freedom loving, democracy defending people that we are, can get locked up for quering a very narrow, lobbyists version of history. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lotus eater Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Have your kind got priamary evidence that 6 million did die? If so provide the evidence. The more your kind stifle debate on this single fact, the greater the suspicion of your motives, whilst pretending that you are defending democracy! Care to explain what you mean by 'your kind', you're not making yourself clear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PopGun Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Of course freedom loving, democracy defending people that we are, can get locked up for quering a very narrow, lobbyists version of history. Why? I think we both know the answer to that question, history is littered with fiction. But you should provide a link to support your opinions, even if it's just an amazon link to a book. Still an interesting angle though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1929crash Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 That 6 million figure is extremely controversial with many christians disbelieving it. Not disbelieving that horrific events occurred, but 6 million gassed? I do not think so I don't know of anyone who disbelieves it except for a few BNP nutters on HPC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebob Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Actually, no, the question everyone is asking is why on earth do we need so many Pakistanis in our country? Why? It doesn't make sense. Britain is full, overcrowded, and with diminishing opportunities for our own people. Pakistan is a backwards religion-dominated unstable 3rd world disaster. Britain is an Anglo Saxon island on teh edge of Europe. There is no natural connection between Pakistan and Britain. During WW2, German citizens were rounded up and interred. We know there are Pakistani terrorist cells in the UK... one student is arrested and then freed, and you have the damned cheek to post a thread whinging about the poor little dear. Get a life. Very good point. If Pakistanis are such a grave threat to Britain, I support rounding up every one of Pakistani decent, including our MPs and the one or two that sit in the House of Lords and then 'Interning them'. But of course it is unlikley that such evidence exists, otherwise internment would have occurred by now. Defeated by your own argument! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.