juvenal Posted April 18, 2015 Share Posted April 18, 2015 (edited) http://www.theguardian.com/money/blog/2015/apr/18/right-to-buy-council-houses-wrong But now something else emerges about the right-to-buy process. According to the agent, there can be up to six names on the purchase agreement, in what he describes as a “crowdfunding” arrangement – although they do have to prove a connection to the property. Extract from link. So are we now in a situation where a little 'syndicate' of six people can club together on a hugely discounted house/flat purchase? Discount up to £100k.... Sell the property in five years at market value plus bonus of HPI and the embedded discount. A better payday for the syndicate than any ISA - that's for sure. Or has Patrick Collinson got it wrong? He doesn't very often.... Edited April 18, 2015 by juvenal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpeggio Posted April 18, 2015 Share Posted April 18, 2015 With many pyramid schemes the rip of amount is far less per person, therefore you can have more people at the bottom of the pyramid. .....but I think 6 is probably the max for housing, if even that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renting til I die Posted April 18, 2015 Share Posted April 18, 2015 As a private tenant, right to buy, with 1 2, 3, 4, 5 or even 6 persons buying, just makes me feel sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.