Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Arpeggio

Members
  • Posts

    8,027
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Arpeggio

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

9,406 profile views
  1. Which is why I said: "This is a database of gene sequences." We have already been through this since a long time ago. This circular argument you brought up for example ⬇️. Well, I'm not too concerned being blocked by someone who barely, if at all, references, relies on wiki without bothering to check if it contains provably incorrect information, and can't construct sentences. One of the weirder things about you is how instructional metadata appears when formerly visible image files become a dead link..............WTF is that about? On the contrary, listen to what all the scientists say on all sides, particularly the ones who claim isolation. (and not just Prof. Baltimore at 0:45) https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/12/5/571/htm (EV = Extracellular Vesicles) "The remarkable resemblance between EVs and viruses has caused quite a few problems in the studies focused on the analysis of EVs released during viral infections. Nowadays, it is an almost impossible mission to separate EVs and viruses by means of canonical vesicle isolation methods, such as differential ultracentrifugation, because they are frequently co-pelleted due to their similar dimension [56,57]. To overcome this problem, different studies have proposed the separation of EVs from virus particles by exploiting their different migration velocity in a density gradient or using the presence of specific markers that distinguish viruses from EVs [56,58,59]. However, to date, a reliable method that can actually guarantee a complete separation does not exist." In other words: "They're definitely in there, we just can't find them" or if you prefer: "They're definitely in there, they just don't turn out to be them when we isolate the things we hypothesise are them"
  2. Then stop repeating yourself and show us; 1. Where there is a purified sample of Sars-Cov-2. 2. Prove it to behave uniquely to a control. 3. That it passes postulates to show that it is pathogenic. This is a database of gene sequences. Some might be mistaken for it appearing as though you think posting it gives credence to the claims in your first paragraph. Please show a connection between any of these and the above 3 points, beyond inference. This is to say that what we are looking at is indicative of foreign contagious pathogens that should not be and are not part of the body, i.e. not just gene sequences which are assumed to be connected to hypothetical viruses, not indicative of a person, or a person in a state of sickness. Virology can't do this. Please show us otherwise. Already addressed same rubbish from someone else but as you are so keen we can expand on this overall subject if you like? ⬇️ https://tnc.news/2022/05/27/doctor-gave-covid-19-shot-to-hundreds-of-kids-as-young-as-six-months-old/ https://www.theepochtimes.com/doctor-with-contrarian-views-on-pandemic-policy-approach-gets-licence-suspended_4445470.html https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?major_industry_sum=pharmaceuticals
  3. There is no purified sample anywhere in the world of Sars-Cov-2 There are no studies proving Sars-Cov-2 to behave uniquely to a control No postulates have been passed Louis Pasteur released his lab notes to his heirs on the provision that they never be made public, but he was found to be a plagiarizing fraud when they were released by his Grandson. Either it definitely exists, we just need to prove it 🤡 or...........it doesn't. I hope that helps!
  4. It's quite fun counting them sometimes. Ooooh hold the phone, it's a peer reviewed study showing PCR19 vaccines increase the risk of Myocarditis by up to 44 times. Is this some kind of special reverse technique where you start trying to slam "peer reviewed" since previously looking down your nostrils unless otherwise? Good point. Now answer the question.
  5. Do you fear that I (not just me) have made people think and you want to put them down fast ? If you would like to give abuse, call names & give emojis and memes while continuously giving b*gger all answers to questions for proof of Sars-Cov-2 being purified / isolated from a sick human or proven pathogenic. I'm right here.
  6. and FDA Flags Risk of Myocarditis in Novavax COVID Vaccine plus ça change (Novavax is the one that uses Moth cells) No more trials for future Covid vaccines: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/fda-will-not-require-clinical-trial-data-authorize-redesigned-covid-boosters-2022-06-30/
  7. Would you like to be given abuse, called names & given emojis and memes while continuously receiving b*gger all answers to questions for proof of Sars-Cov-2 being purified / isolated from a sick human or proven pathogenic?
  8. In that case please verify these claims and answer the question as per my reply to you 1/3rd down this post Thankyou OK
  9. Quote: "like being trapped on a rollercoaster in a horror film" Australia 90% fully vaccinated by 20th Dec 2021: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/12/covid-19-vaccine-rollout-update-21-december-2021.pdf The more people die the more real it is for you. Please answer the question. I put it to you that you are infact, a Steam powered Hitler bot refurbished by the Furzmann Kollaboration. My evidence for this is that I have no evidence because you wouldn't want to be known for such a thing. Also someone called "James". I have no idea who James is. I have explained and referenced why he won. For the second time I ask that you explain to everyone what this "legal technicality" was. Given the gravity of what you speak, answering the questions would therefore be of equal & critical importance. Thankyou
  10. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/fda-will-not-require-clinical-trial-data-authorize-redesigned-covid-boosters-2022-06-30/ "U.S. health regulators will not require companies to submit new clinical trial data on COVID-19 vaccines" (for new "strains") You've no idea who James is. I have explained and referenced why he won. Now you explain to everyone what this technicality was. The question was; "Show me them controlled studies proving Sars-Cov-2". Given the apparent gravity of the situation in your non-answer, answering this question would therefore be of equal importance. Thankyou
  11. You have provided a quote from someone called "James" on a testimonials page a year after Hamer's weird letter to Lanka. Perhaps you would also like to do a big reveal on how Dr. Sam Bailey is actually a Nazi from the dark side of the moon who arrived on a UFO......as you can see at 0:45 seconds of this video she fires a nazi mind bio beam to make Prof David Baltimore stumble. 6:11 interesting too, as is the whole clip. Lanka won his case at the supreme court over measles too, largely based on that no control experiments were carried out, which is very ironic for you. Court papers linked on here https://www.deepl.com/translator Now answer the question
  12. Please verify your claims and answer the question as per my reply to you on this post. Please answer the question. and home made Dalek videos.
  13. It doesn't depend on whether you keep promoting them. Fair summary. EU Renews Digital Covid Pass Despite 99% Negative Public Feedback. There was also the pandemic treaty. I see you have now brought back the antisemitic part into your other repeat lies. We left off on this particular one on August 2021, at the bottom of this post ⬇️, which you never replied to; Here's the letter mentioned at bottom of that post, due to the link URL changing since then. https://en.germanische-heilkunde-dr-hamer.com/archiv/2007/dr-hamer-to-lanka-01-09-2007 Please verify your claims and answer the question..... That's 2 people though, a 100% increase. Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0895435622001007#!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.