Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Landlord's Fleecing Just About Everyone. Square Foot Rent As Much As Buying


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

At a time when their financing rates have fallen from 5.0% to 0.5% (ie 90% lower costs)...

I was chatting me ma the other day, she happened to mention she got talking to a shop manager in the Grafton Centre in Cambridge after noticing a sizeable (i'll have to take her word for it, I havent been to Cambridge in many months) number of units were vacant. The shop manager said they are moving out too because they cant afford the rent.

(apparently the grafton centre is owned by the University, who admittedly usually give f*ck all about the rest of Cambridge anyway)

Saw this in the paper today, so thought id post...

http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Home/Grand-Arcade-rent-higher-than-London-20012012.htm

The cost of renting retail space in Cambridge’s Grand Arcade is higher than in some of London’s poshest shopping streets,

The rent being paid by jewellery firm Azendi in the plush mall is understood by the News to be about £100,000 a year – just over £100 for every square foot of space the shop occupies.

But a shop currently up for rent in Oxford Street, described as the capital’s "leading luxury shopping destination", although bigger, is proportionately cheaper to rent - £82 per square foot.

It is even less expensive to rent per square foot in west London’s upmarket Kensington High Street. A vacant shop there is up for lease at £75 per square foot.

£100 a square foot??!!! To rent?! For one year?! Thats what i aim to pay to OWN a place. Absolutely insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443

At a time when their financing rates have fallen from 5.0% to 0.5% (ie 90% lower costs)...

I was chatting me ma the other day, she happened to mention she got talking to a shop manager in the Grafton Centre in Cambridge after noticing a sizeable (i'll have to take her word for it, I havent been to Cambridge in many months) number of units were vacant. The shop manager said they are moving out too because they cant afford the rent.

(apparently the grafton centre is owned by the University, who admittedly usually give f*ck all about the rest of Cambridge anyway)

Saw this in the paper today, so thought id post...

http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Home/Grand-Arcade-rent-higher-than-London-20012012.htm

The cost of renting retail space in Cambridge’s Grand Arcade is higher than in some of London’s poshest shopping streets,

The rent being paid by jewellery firm Azendi in the plush mall is understood by the News to be about £100,000 a year – just over £100 for every square foot of space the shop occupies.

But a shop currently up for rent in Oxford Street, described as the capital’s "leading luxury shopping destination", although bigger, is proportionately cheaper to rent - £82 per square foot.

It is even less expensive to rent per square foot in west London’s upmarket Kensington High Street. A vacant shop there is up for lease at £75 per square foot.

£100 a square foot??!!! To rent?! For one year?! Thats what i aim to pay to OWN a place. Absolutely insane.

It depends on the location and shopping centre

Last year I rented a unit in a shopping centre and it was 950 rent/service charge & 200 for business rates per square foot per year

Your not really paying for space you are paying for footfall.

I could have rented a warehouse probably for less than £5 a sq ft but would have done zero business

Put it this way that store owner is probably paying between half and 1 penny for each person that walks last his store

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444

It depends on the location and shopping centre

Last year I rented a unit in a shopping centre and it was 950 rent/service charge & 200 for business rates per square foot per year

Your not really paying for space you are paying for footfall.

I could have rented a warehouse probably for less than £5 a sq ft but would have done zero business

Put it this way that store owner is probably paying between half and 1 penny for each person that walks last his store

Half and 1 penny per person ... really ... that's 10 million people per year ...?

At 363 trading days a year ... that is circa 27.5k people a trading day (at 1p per person: 10 million pence = 100 000 GBP).

That's circa 2700 people/hour or 45 people per minute.

So a sustained footfall throughout the trading day, every day, of 45 people per minute. I don't think so, sorry. Unless the store front is only slightly wider than the door and you line the people up in a *very* orderly fashion :)

950 rent/service charge & 200 business rates for a store of what size?

Aidanapword

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445

Half and 1 penny per person ... really ... that's 10 million people per year ...?

At 363 trading days a year ... that is circa 27.5k people a trading day (at 1p per person: 10 million pence = 100 000 GBP).

That's circa 2700 people/hour or 45 people per minute.

So a sustained footfall throughout the trading day, every day, of 45 people per minute. I don't think so, sorry. Unless the store front is only slightly wider than the door and you line the people up in a *very* orderly fashion :)

950 rent/service charge & 200 business rates for a store of what size?

Aidanapword

typo: think he means paying over a penny for everyone walking past the store, not going in it,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
Guest tbatst2000

Maybe Cambridge want the land to build more uni stuff on?

No, the Grand Arcade (or Bland Arcade as the locals call it) was only built 3 or 4 years back. Also, I don't think Cambridge University has much (or any) direct stake in it. From what I recall it was a joint venture between the Universities Superannuation Scheme (UK university joint final salary pension scheme) and Grosvenor Estates (Duke of Westminster) with USS buying out the entire stake back around 2010 time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448

typo: think he means paying over a penny for everyone walking past the store, not going in it,

Thanks for the heads up on the typo.

I had assumed he meant walking *past* though ...

At 45 people per minute that is 1 person every 1.3 seconds walking past the store front at a sustained level (which, to be fair, is my point). Very few of us walk close enough to each other to move at this sort of rate (except, perhaps during a Tube Strike) ... and even fewer of us would be comfortable walking through a shopping centre this crowded. And even Oxford Street is not this crowded at the beginning or end of the shopping day in the run up to Christmas ... let alone the lull of a random Tuesday in March?

And then there is the Q about whether the person(s) walking past there store are:

i) economically active

ii) in the store's target market (less NB for stores with high volume product (eg: PaperChase vs an i*VeryExpensiveAppleThing* Store)

iii) etc.

This rent is 275 GBP per day. Open for 10 hours, at an average of 5 transactions per hour ... that's a premium of 5.50 per transaction to cover the rent alone. *That* is scary .. no? No wonder the web folks are making more money (facing smaller losses)?

My numbers might be wrong but even if they are wrong by half then it is still scary that people think this business model is sustainable.

Aidanapword

edit: for maths

Edited by Aidan Ap Word
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information