IMHAL
-
Posts
10,706 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by IMHAL
-
-
4 minutes ago, Cocha said:
No trolling from me dougie boy, you just can't handle not getting your own way back in June 2016 and the only way you can try and cope with this is to make up your own reality to believe, as you are not emotionally capable of accepting people having different views, experiences and opinions to your own. You voted and supported the de-industrialisation of the UK for decades, you didn't give a toss about the human and economic damage this caused. Only since June 2016 have you started pretending to care, but only due to your bitterness at having lost to people you think you are better than. That is what really eats you up. Cry harder.
So where are you building this battery factory? Just the country will surfice.
We are talking electronic batteries and not battery chickens right?
-
On 20/01/2023 at 14:54, msi said:
US judge fines Donald Trump nearly $1m for Clinton lawsuit
Turns out the claims about the Steal are cr*p.
Where are our Trump fanboyz?
Plenty of Trumpoids still around, usually parroting Putin propaganda or eschewing the virtues of being poor in Brexit land.
-
1 hour ago, thecrashingisles said:
Does the absurdity of statements like this never occur to you as you write them? We have a closer trading relationship with the EU than Canada has with the USA.
Now I get it!
So you are saying that Brexit has shown that Canada can be more prosperous than it is now if it got even closer to the USA.
As we used to be more prosperous when we were closer to the EU.
Makes perfect sense.
-
12 minutes ago, Staffsknot said:
I think it must be a full moon - they are all coming out of the woodwork faster than Nadine Dorres at a Bojo BJ party.
I guess Zelensky travelling around Europe has rattled a few people into needing spike stories
It is funny to see, full on conspiracy fest spew mixed with straight up Rusky propaganda comin at'cha from all directions. Feels like a full on disnfo war...time for me to take a nap, need to rejuvanate my digits in case there's any incoming later :)
-
17 minutes ago, Cocha said:
I'm quite happy for the government to bung them some cash. In what way are we going it alone? Have a look where the majority of the worlds raw materials come from. (Here's a clue, it ain't the UK. It ain't the EU either)
Where are you building your battery factory buddy? It is a battery factory is it not?
-
11 minutes ago, Grayphil said:
Actually Larry, you have changed my mind.
@Si1 @Staffsknot @IMHAL and all the others are clearly CIA shills.
More credible research in the thread below from an independent journalist.
https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/30698-are-they-laying-traps-for-conspiracy-researchers/
I wish I was, the pay and pension is good I hear, but it's claimed they are all devil worshipers, eat babies and drink virgins blood for breakfast...that put me off, but only a bit. I'm still open to negotiations tho...
-
3 minutes ago, Lucky Larry said:
Anyway I have to go to work now so if you can find any more grainy vids with dodgy subtitles to delude you please pass them on , we all need a good laugh.......at you.
What? You have more web sites you troll....erm...I mean attend to?
And there was I thinking we were special....sob.
-
15 minutes ago, Lucky Larry said:
Getting desperate now , if he had done as you claim then the CIA could have indicted him for that crime using this as evidence, now go and sit down and work out why they didn't , it starts with B and ends in S 😂 silly gullible boy
OBL was already indicted in 1998 on terrorist charges, you do know he had a habit of dabbling in that line of work right?
The aim of the indictment was so that if/when captured he would stand trial for the broad range of terrorist activities, which would then have including 9/11.
-
1 minute ago, Lucky Larry said:
The problem is, Larry, can I call you Larry because Lucky doesn't really seem to fit, your ability to weigh up evidence is absolutley dreadfull.
Not only do you ignore the facts, but you seem intent on believing/propagating that which is unproven.
In this case OBL freely admitted to 9/11, naming the perpetrators, intricate knowledge of the planning and organising involved. He made this video of his own free will and posted a video gloating about it.
That means that your supposed conspiracy theories about the pipeline are also suspect, because you are not a reliable character.
-
2 minutes ago, Lucky Larry said:
He always denied responsibility , that video does not present the evidence you claim and to this day he has never been indicted for that crime as the CIA have admitted there is no evidence linking him to that event.
Erm...he clearly admitted it in the video. It being the organisation he leads.
-
So good I had to do it a number of times.
-
1 hour ago, Lucky Larry said:
I have not dismissed the possibility of Russia being involved I have looked at the evidence and the statements of intent , the statements of congratulations on completing the job , the location of military in the timeframe and the word of a highly credible journalist that he has the testimony of someone who attended the planning meeting to carry out the said operation . The evidence is overwhelmingly pointing to one side , there is zero evidence pointing at Russia. Of course there is also cui bono to consider and yet again it points towards the US .
Is that something like you claiming to look at all the evidence for 9/11
Did you consider OBL's taking responsibility, his naming of the assailants and the planning they undertook.
Perhaps your ability to weigh up evidence is, let's say, a little 'suspect'
-
59 minutes ago, Lucky Larry said:
I have not dismissed the possibility of Russia being involved I have looked at the evidence and the statements of intent , the statements of congratulations on completing the job , the location of military in the timeframe and the word of a highly credible journalist that he has the testimony of someone who attended the planning meeting to carry out the said operation . The evidence is overwhelmingly pointing to one side , there is zero evidence pointing at Russia. Of course there is also cui bono to consider and yet again it points towards the US .
Is that something like you claiming to look at all the evidence for 9/11
Did you consider OBL's taking responsibility, his naming of the assailants and the planning they undertook.
Perhaps your ability to weigh up evidence is, let's say, a little 'suspect'
-
59 minutes ago, Lucky Larry said:
I have not dismissed the possibility of Russia being involved I have looked at the evidence and the statements of intent , the statements of congratulations on completing the job , the location of military in the timeframe and the word of a highly credible journalist that he has the testimony of someone who attended the planning meeting to carry out the said operation . The evidence is overwhelmingly pointing to one side , there is zero evidence pointing at Russia. Of course there is also cui bono to consider and yet again it points towards the US .
Is that something like you claiming to look at all the evidence for 9/11
Did you consider OBL's taking responsibility, his naming of the assailants and the planning they undertook.
Perhaps your ability to weigh up evidence is, let's say, a little 'suspect'
-
59 minutes ago, Lucky Larry said:
I have not dismissed the possibility of Russia being involved I have looked at the evidence and the statements of intent , the statements of congratulations on completing the job , the location of military in the timeframe and the word of a highly credible journalist that he has the testimony of someone who attended the planning meeting to carry out the said operation . The evidence is overwhelmingly pointing to one side , there is zero evidence pointing at Russia. Of course there is also cui bono to consider and yet again it points towards the US .
Is that something like you claiming to look at all the evidence for 9/11
Did you consider OBL's taking responsibility, his naming of the assailants and the planning they undertook.
Perhaps your ability to weigh up evidence is, let's say, a little 'suspect'
-
5 minutes ago, Cocha said:
And you keep wishing us back into the EU off the back of a few undefined polls of a few thousand people. If there was really such a string undercurrent for rejoining "something", I'm sure a political party would be picking up on this.
Just keep doing what Brexit is doing, as I said, things will work themselves out. That is what democracy is about. And I'm happy for that to be the case either way.
-
9 minutes ago, Cocha said:
Regardless of how the economy is or isn't going, there will be huge resistance to FoM and the Euro and that is my point about this being laid out on the table from the off. People will vote against such things regardless of anything else.
I guess we will just have to see. In the meantime, we can all keep disagreeing in here to pass the time.
You guys carry on 'being happy' and defending the Brexit status quo to the hilt and I'm sure it will work itself out.
-
2 minutes ago, miguel said:
Errr. . . the EU is just about to collapse? as virtually every clown brex shter told us back in . . . 2016!!!!
Fkin hell, just proves how completely fckin useless Brex shters are.
Oh and bent bananas and recently. . . mealworm!!! Lol !!
Oh and Cocha is/has? set up an electric car battery plant? maybe, he's being all coy on things.
Wot a fckin bunch of trairor ars*holes.
Well at least Brexit failed in one good respect. It failed to dis-unite our collective response to Russian aggression in Ukraine.
Putin wanted Brexit for this reason. Brexiteers are in denial, totally blind or complicite to this.
Brexit didn't do us any favours for sure, but it failed to damage us in our unity with our allies, and for that at least we have to be grateful.
Likewise Trump and his right wing red-necks supporters who sought to overturn the constitution. Putin failed there too.
Brexit is really just a small piece of a bigger geopolitical puzzle that is unravelling fast.
-
7 minutes ago, Cocha said:
Bearing in mind many people didn't vote financially either way, but just to be rid of EU rule, then I think you are being somewhat optimistic. FoM and the Euro as a minimum will be 2 key issues alone, let alone the future direction the EU intends to take. This will all come under much scrutiny and questioning.
I suspect that the major constraints/condition for re-joining will be laid on the table and made clear well before any vote takes place.
As for how significant the Euro/FoM is will depend on how well or badly Brexit has faired.
In short, the way Brexit is going at the moment, I expect that we will start to accept the standard deal that any other country has to join. There may be a bit of wrangling around the edges to make it paletable, but that's all.
-
19 minutes ago, Cocha said:
Because unfortunately for you losers, you aren't going to get us back in with such a simplistic question as we got us out with. People just saying they want to rejoin is meaningless without quantifying what is it they want to rejoin. What exactly would you like to rejoin monsieur?
I'm not sure that a question to re-join will have to be that complicated.
If Brexit continues on it's current trajectory of making us poorer I suspect the nature of the question will be irrelevant. People will vote with their wallet in mind.
The real question is will the EU want us after Brexit has damaged the UK so badly, both economically and politically. I suspect the answer to that is no they won't, at least not yet.
-
9 hours ago, Lucky Larry said:
Ahhh I see , you all cared when you were screaming that Putin was responsible but now even you can't defend the obvious it is suddenly unimportant. Funny how the US launching an attack on German infrastructure (a nato ally) which resulted in a massive rise in energy costs all over Europe ( which did cost some people their lives) is something nobody should care about . I suppose it's as close to an admission that you and the rest were all wrong that we will get .
You are prone to consiracy theories, that's now a given.
It's all speculation, there is no proof. Your version of the 'truth' is being fed by dodgy sites preying on feeble minds, such as yours.
Russia is not above destroying energy and power infrastructure.....their actions in Ukraine prove it, they have a track record and their involvement can't be dismissed out of hand.
-
14 minutes ago, yelims said:
Has anyone threatened Russia with nuclear weapons
the mental gymnastics you perform to excuse nazis is incredible
Staffs is not excusing them. He is simply saying don't behave like one of them.
I too find it difficult not to be repulsed by Putin's Russia...in fact I am. But this war will be won at the end of the day with hearts and minds. If Ukr behaved in the same way as Russian soldiers do then they would have not elicited as much support. It's not just about moral high ground, there is a practical side to this too.
-
44 minutes ago, Lucky Larry said:
Putin did not threaten to close it down , Biden did , Truss texted "it's done" 2 minutes after the explosion, a Polish MEP publicly thanked the US for causing the explosion , there were military operations involving the US in that area just prior to the attack , a highly credible Western journalist claims he was informed the US was responsible by someone who was at the planning meeting and the Swedes decided not to publish the report into their investigations . Even Chomsky is saying it's obvious who is responsible . Whether you admit it or not is irrelevant , you just make yourself look gullible or dishonest by doing so.
It's still all specualtion. But really, who cares? It's done and no one was killed.
Unlike Russia invasion of Ukraine and their murderous tactics against Ukr and civillains alike.
Now that's something you don't talk about often - erm...at all!
-
Just now, Lucky Larry said:
It's proof that the CIA are evil enough to propose a plan that involves murdering their own citizens and military for political gain , it almost exactly mirrors the attacks of 9/11 which the neocon think tank group "project for a new American Century" concluded almost 12 months earlier that what the US needed to advance its interests globally was " a catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor" These people would not think twice about blowing up a pipeline if they thought it was to their advantage , which it was.
And Russia is not evil? Give it a break sonny.
Will Russia invade Ukraine and what happens if it escalates with NATO/US getting involved
in Current affairs
Posted
Advice, don't be an opposition politician in Putin's Russia, unless you want to be poisoned or jailed for a very long time.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-64601407
A former governor from Russia's Far East has been sentenced to 22 years in jail for murder and attempted murder in a controversial court case in Moscow.
Sergei Furgal insists he is innocent and says the trial against him was motivated by politics.
He was elected governor of Khabarovsk region in 2018, unexpectedly beating the Kremlin's preferred candidate.