Jonesy74

I think this thread should now be dedicated to misquotes. Actually, every reply to the troll should be a misquote

Me or you? Let’s start a poll. Or we could just look at the number of holders of bitcoin vs this thing you’re shilling and see which has most support?

Exactly. I think there’s a case for paying capital gains earlier for the ultra wealthy. I don’t know what the limit should be. I mentioned 10M earlier (and meant 10M in gain annually), but maybe it should be higher than that. It’s not something I’m really an advocate for but find it strange that people are so against it. For those saying it can’t work for various reasons - it doesn’t need to apply to everything. Just applying it to regular company stock would be fine as a start. And if it goes down after you’ve paid your tax, so what? You can actually sell if you don’t want the risk of the stock going down. And otherwise, you have a higher cost basis now and can sell for a loss (and tax deduction) if you want. You would be in the exact same position as someone who bought the stock at the higher price before it went down.

Another get rich* quick crapcoin. No thanks. All the nocoiners are desperate to create a new bitcoin because they missed out on the early gains. It’s pitiful really. *poor

https://apnews.com/article/fox-news-dominion-lawsuit-trial-trump-2020-0ac71f75acfacc52ea80b3e747fb0afe The settlement was with Fox News. Tucker was the one lying on air. He was later fired from Fox likely as part of the settlement. (You got me, M not B, but still, proven liar)

Primarily about the price. ETFs mean it’s more accessible and so more demand, which means a higher fiat price. Also there is the legitimacy aspect - governments approved the etfs so are much less likely to now ban bitcoin. I’m not a big fan of the financialisation of it. The ETFs are at least backed by actual bitcoin, but then there are futures, and you can imagine derivatives of the ETFs coming at some point, which reduces demand for actual bitcoin since tradition finance people can hold those instead.

What a car crash of a thread

The same Tucker Carlson that was caught admitting he knew there was no fraud but that they were just playing to their audience. The same Tucker Carlson who reported for Fox News about dodgy Dominion voting machines that later got sued and settled for $800B Yea, you can certainly “find” fraud if you look hard enough, until you get caught.

Still waiting for that late 2023 rate cut? 😂 Yea, let the president set rates to 0 and run up tons of debt and inflation for the next one. What could go wrong?

This thinking is what the ultra wealthy rely on. Some people have billions, hundreds of billions. It’s hard for the human brain to comprehend just how much that is

Declare the value of the assets and cost basis and figure out tax owed, adjusting the future tax basis I would guess. I doubt it. I’m not against the idea if it targets capital gains of $10M+ (that’s my own made up figure, not from the proposal).

So you bought zero, have zero, and just came here to troll. Gotcha. Tokenising a real world asset. In other words storing the owner in a database. Nice tech. Meanwhile bitcoin is here with no use being the best form of money available. Enjoy your tokenised nothing and have a good day.

Please do share how much you bought and at what price. Or did you just see one random thing go up in price and ran over here to tell us it’s better than bitcoin? Put your money behind your trolling attempts. And yes, when I’m holding 6, nearly 7 figures, the hash rate is very relevant to me because I don’t want a centralised miner compromising the network

I think I’ve seen this story before but it was called ripple/xrp back then. How does the hash rate compare to bitcoin?

Apparently austerity doesn’t apply in this case. We should stick that on a bus saying send the £1.8M to the NHS