Sunday, August 2, 2015

You can too!

I own most of my street

Unusually, Mr Windsor did not remortgage his existing properties in order to buy subsequent ones. He saved the required deposits while working so that he wasnÂ’t heavily leveraged. What are you wIting for - I hear that Enfield is ripe for the plucking.

Posted by debtserf @ 10:02 AM (6082 views)
Please complete the required fields.



10 thoughts on “You can too!

  • he first became interested in property in 2006 when house prices in his area fell by up to 50pc. “Repossessions were increasingly common and many people were put off buying property altogether, but I saw it as an opportunity to get a good deal,”

    Which illustrates a problem with the next house price crash, which I see no sign of. BTLers will swoop in and pick up property on the cheap.

    Luckily, we have an enlightened political system determined to discourage rent collecting and encourage rising home ownership.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • House prices fell by 50% in 2006??

    And what’s all this emphasis on continuous ‘stress testing’ as though avoidance of leverage were some secret of success. Banks don’t think so

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • Something wrong with the maths here!

    “He charges between £600 and £650 a month in rent”

    “Mr Windsor calculates that his portfolio’s gross return – the rental income as a percentage of the cost of the properties – is 19pc”

    So simple maths says he payed about £39,500 per property on average.

    He also says that he bought the first property (and presumably the cheapest) for £62,500.

    He may be a Cambridge graduate and think he has stress tested his finances for all eventualities but is this is an example of his maths, then I fear for his future!!

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • Cambridge graduate shouts from the rooftop of one of his houses “house prices only ever go up” so it must be true

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • As for those ‘good employment opportunities’ for migrants who pay £600+ pm rent he must be talking of the super-exploited migrants in Thetford who have been under the thumb of gangmasters recruiting for very low-paid / no-frills jobs in picking, cutting and packing for the just-in-time supermarket demand.

    Thetford lost 700 jobs with the closure/relocation of the local ‘Tulip’ plant (cutting and packing Danish, intensively-farmed pork) in 2007, just as this chap was starting out. Being migrants herded by said gangmasters most of the 700 were entitled to nothing. Most of the other migrants in the town were in zero-hours-type jobs working until midnight one day, unemployed the next – definitely not the jobs that fit in with a settled family life and workers paying regular rents (most not entitled to HB).

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • wdbeast said…
    Something wrong with the maths here!

    I thought that as well when I first saw it.

    But maybe he is doing the calculation using the income left after he has paid his mortgage etc as a percentage of just the cash he put in to start with. Ignoring the actual value of the house.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • Hi cornishman – yes I am sure you are right, but I would have expected a more robust set of figures from a Cambridge graduate, though he probably read psychology (definitely not history!!)

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • Clearly not your average student if he managed to save 6 grand while at university! Most people end up with £30k debts so he must have the MIdas touch.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • Bought first property at the peak of a housing bubble…must have Midas touch.

    What surprises me is how landlords just assume tenant demand will never be an issue

    If rates start to rise he will likely fall into negative equity and with ftbs buying properties
    From liquidated btl portfolios who’s gonna rent all the btlets?

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • He is probably taking into account increases in the value of the property in his calculation… The worry I would say will be if they dropped 50% in value before and he has on average 80%ltv what if they drop by 50% again in the future.

    Would not be so worrying if they were on repayment as at least the debt would be being paid off…

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



Add a comment

  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>