Thursday, April 11, 2013

Government appropriation jumps another 35bn

Final salary pension deficits jump by £35bn in a month

These companies are supposed to drive the economy.. anyway, so they now have to hand over ANOTHER 35 bn to the government ( one thousand pounds per UK worker) which will spend it immediately and give them an IOU. Possibly this is due to the astonishing level of Japan QE but even so. Next year Osbourne covered himself (not the UK) by dropping gilt requirements 8% due to transferring the interest payments back from the BoE(the cash supposed to cover future gilt losses..). 2015 who knows? Pensioners in the UK never seem to consider that in the future people might not want to support their grandiose self-signed pension agreements.

Posted by stillthinking @ 05:04 AM (2231 views)
Please complete the required fields.



6 thoughts on “Government appropriation jumps another 35bn

  • stillthinking says:

    I would add.

    At some point all of the companies involved in this are going to become unable to meet their requirements. They are unable to invest in new equipment and basically trade at a disadvantage to companies not dragged into the UK government funding net. When they actually go under being incapable of matching competitors on price, there will be a fire sale of their assets and their share price will collapse.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • mark wadsworth says:

    “Pensioners in the UK never seem to consider that in the future people might not want to support their grandiose self-signed pension agreements.”

    That’s fighting talk!

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • If interest rates are allowed to rise, the deficits will turn to surplus in short procession, because most of pension income is in the form of bonds. We are seeing mass confiscation by the banksters of pension money with artificially low interest rate. Be under no illusion, it is theft.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • @Libertas

    “If interest rates are allowed to rise, the deficits will turn to surplus in short procession, because most of pension income is in the form of bonds.”

    Freshly purchased bonds would offer a higher yield but the value of existing bonds would drop. I suspect some pension funds already invested in bonds would have to deal with large losses which would negate the advantages of the higher yields caused by rising rates.

    http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/04/031904.asp

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • stillthinking says:

    I think he just typed that out wrong. We all know the losses that will happen.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • mark wadsworth says:

    QG: “Freshly purchased bonds would offer a higher yield but the value of existing bonds would drop. I suspect some pension funds already invested in bonds would have to deal with large losses which would negate the advantages of the higher yields caused by rising rates.”

    Thanks, you’ve saved me the bother of stating the bleeding obvious. By and large, assuming a pension fund is 100% asset backed with bonds, the fall in the NPV of future payments is equal to the fall in market value of the bonds.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



Add a comment

  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>