Wednesday, August 24, 2011
The property ladder can be a trap
Low house prices trap a quarter of all mortgaged homeowners
A quarter of all mortgaged homeowners find it almost impossible to move house or take out a new deal. Figures from trade body the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) show that more than one in twelve borrowers — some 827,000 — are in negative equity, i.e. meaning they owe more on their mortgage than their house is worth. Yet a further 1.7 million, roughly 17 pc of mortgage holders, have less than 10 pc equity in their properties, according to Money Mail research. Many of these people took out mortgages with just a small deposit before the credit crunch, and are now trapped because their house price has fallen. Henry Pryor, an independent estate agent, says: ‘These people are prisoners in their own home and may be stuck on an expensive mortgage deal.’
7 thoughts on “The property ladder can be a trap”
Add a comment
- Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
- Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
- Please adhere to the Guidelines
mark wadsworth says:
That’s yet another triumph of Home-Owner-Ism! Isn’t the whole idea to ramp up bank income via mortgage lending as far as possible?
If they manage to encourage people to borrow more than a house is worth, then that’s all good, from the banks’ point of view!
nickb says:
It may also be seen as debt peonage / indentured labour: work for decades paying the banks a large share of your income, or be homeless. Earn your freedom… shortly before you die.
enuii says:
The end of triple A* everyone is a winner economics.
will says:
Well done Henry Pryor. One of the lone voices of reason in estate agency.
watchman says:
@2 “Earn your freedom… shortly before you die.”
very true
A says:
Their situation would be even worse if property prices were higher because higher prices means higher prices differences.
For example, if prices were 20% higher, their 100k house would be worth 120k. However, the 200k house they want would be worth 240k. So they would have to find a further 140k, as opposed to the 100k they had to find in the “low price” scenario.
Hardcheese says:
Look on the bright side, at least you have a roof over your head, things will improve and all the whingers will eventually die 🙂