Thursday, January 6, 2011

…and lo did the forsaken FTBs rejoice!

First-time buyers offered help in housing market

Comedy piece from yesterday's Guardian. Mmm, 90% LTV, 2-year fixed @ 5.79%? Lemme at it. Enter Jack from stage left to rip this, ahem, advertisement to shreds.

Posted by sibley's b'stard child @ 09:30 AM (1102 views)
Please complete the required fields.

3 thoughts on “…and lo did the forsaken FTBs rejoice!

  • Sib’s – I have noticed a few lenders (lets not get carried away) increasing LTV’s in recent days – Woolwich being one that is actually not mentioned by the Guardian, whilst the Halifax deal is only available direct and not via brokers. Rather than “rip this, ahem, advertisement to shreds” I’ll leave it to the people in the comments section who have already spotted the major flaws. The only thing I would add is that the major lenders will use such deals to actually try and pull customers into the branches and then cross sell other products ie optimistic FTB enters branch only to find the inhouse “adviser” is more interested in transferring their current a/c, savings a/c, credit card balance, re-finance personal loan etc.

    Please complete the required fields.

  • sibley's b'stard child says:

    Cheers for the insight Jack. As an aside, I wasn’t being facetious; in fact the blog (and indeed the forum as a whole) is an veritable hot-bed of financial professionals which can cut through the cr*p disseminated via the media.

    I, on the other hand, can offer pithy one-liners.

    And stationery.

    Please complete the required fields.

  • Mark Wadsworth says:

    “a first-time buyer taking out a £130,000 mortgage with a 10% deposit at 5.79% would face monthly repayments of £820.98. But the same buyer with a 25% deposit would be able to choose a mortgage with a rate as low as 2.99% with Saffron Building Society, which would reduce monthly repayments by over £200 to £615.80.”

    That works out at a marginal interest rate on the top slice of the mortgage (90% minus 75%) of 19.79%.

    Please complete the required fields.

Add a comment

  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>