Thursday, March 4, 2010

A bit of re-stocking, a bit of number-fiddling

Is the recovery real?

Reagan's Assistant Sec. of the US Treasury argues that the 5.9% GDP growth in Q4 2009 is due largely to inventory accumulation and the rest is due to statistical games. As with the UK, the expansion of monetary base hasn't fanned out into broad money expansion. Lack of consumers' income growth led to private indebtedness, but that driver of economic growth has now gone. Add in the export of good jobs and you wonder where the basis for recovery is. He says fiscal tightening is deemed necessary since US debt can't be financed indefinitely by foreigners' trade surpluses, and monetisation at this point threatens the $ reserve status - but why do bankers and the military get the government largesse while health and social security bear the brunt of calls for government cuts?

Posted by icarus @ 05:08 PM (1214 views)
Please complete the required fields.

2 thoughts on “A bit of re-stocking, a bit of number-fiddling

  • Whose recovery – home-owner, ftb, banker’s, woolworths cashier….?

    Please complete the required fields.

  • fallingbuzzard says:

    Inventory cycle in expectation of the V or U-shaped recovery and not expecting withdrawal of government stimulus

    Please complete the required fields.

Add a comment

  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>