Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009

Wonky moral compass

CNN: Priest: Thou shalt not steal (unless it's from big business)

A UK priest has defended his comments that it is acceptable to steal from large companies.
Tim Jones, parish priest of St Lawrence and St Hilda, told his congregation in York, northern England: "My advice, as a Christian priest, is to shoplift."

Posted by devo @ 08:06 AM (1750 views)
Add Comment
Report Article

55 Comments

1. devo said...

cue hissy fit from little miss professor

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 08:14AM Report Comment
 

2. shipbuilder said...

I would say to anyone read what he actually said before you comment. I would say he's a realist.
The real question behind the story is - why should the common man deal with moral absolutes while those further up the food chain get to be more flexible?
Is, for example, paying someone an unliveable wage or price for their goods stealing from them?

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:35AM Report Comment
 

3. rumble said...

devo, the house of God.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:37AM Report Comment
 

4. rumble said...

Shippy, true, but that would be transferring one's employer's thieving onto the shops. In a country with a meddling government better to practice Thoreau's Civil Disobedience.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:46AM Report Comment
 

5. rumble said...

Of course, having read it, he's referring to people who don't pay tax, so my above comment doesn't apply.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:51AM Report Comment
 

6. happy mondays said...

The powers at be have been stealing off the rest of us for centuries, even took the land, carved it up into bite size pieces & sell it back to us at extortionate rates, which once paid for will help fund payment for the old peoples home they like to put us in..
Dirty rotten scoundrel's...Viva la Revolution

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:55AM Report Comment
 

7. shipbuilder said...

'Thou shalt not steal (unless you're big business)' could be a headline every day.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:57AM Report Comment
 

8. rumble said...

Has government helping the poor (meddling) removed the urge for others to be generous. Eliminating caring from society. Hardship brings out the best? Unintended consequences.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 12:05PM Report Comment
 

9. shipbuilder said...

rumble, the idea of the welfare state was to act on behalf of society for the most needy. The reason why it is there is because people weren't being generous.
But that ignores the property/resources issue - the welfare state as it currently is is not needed as people should have a citizen's wage - their share of the country's natural resources that are their birthright.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 12:50PM Report Comment
 

10. cat and canary said...

The fact that everyone feels they have to steal from others to survive, or make ends meet, or just keep up with the Jone's, is the real problem. Moving to London made me accutely aware of this.

There's something rotten at the heart of society if everyone's stealing of everyone else. So I disagree with the priest, and wonder if he is aware of "give to those who despitefully use you"???

The only solution, IMO, is to break the cycle of animosity, and that in turn requires givers (whether individuals or companies) to outnumber takers.

i.e. giving is not "false humility" or foolish ...there is a very good motive for giving.... not just to feel good, not just to help someone, but also to change mindsets of those you give to and thus break the cycle of animosity.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 02:04PM Report Comment
 

11. rumble said...

Shippy, interesting. A ruse by any other name is still a ruse? Citizen's wage is pretty much benefits renamed. I think I have two issues with that. First, giving cash enables choice including the purchase of, for example, drugs (no generalising all, just example), and I wouldn't have a problem with that choice if it were earned money, but as my tax money I am only prepared to pay for basics, food, shelter. Second, having a stake in something, even a country, requires some contribution, otherwise it's parasitism. Then the OCD in me raises a third issue, disliking the untidy little handing of the wage to the wealthy, who are also elligible as citizens, who then probably just hand it back, rather than everyone simply starting on the alternative level playing field of no citizen's wage, which leads us back to benefits or generosity.

On the first issue: people weren't being generous, or people were deemed insufficiently generous, in which case could the admirable goal simply have been a little unnecessarily ambitious of some pompous git who thought he could save the world?

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 02:21PM Report Comment
 

12. happy mondays said...

C&C nicely said, however someone once told me that ' Givers have to know when to stop giving, as Takers do not know when to stop taking' but maybe oneday we shall all live in harmony..

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 02:23PM Report Comment
 

13. rumble said...

CnC (played Command and Conquer?),
"The fact that everyone feels they have to steal from others to survive, or make ends meet, or just keep up with the Jone's, is the real problem. Moving to London made me accutely aware of this."

I'm not sure Londoners steal for those reasons, as much as they think they have some sort of community entitlement, or Robin Hood obligation to redistribute everything and anything. Among various other parts, I've had a mud guard taken from my bike. I admit I have no idea of the black market rate for a mud guard, but I can't imagine it helped with the above, considering benefits and that bicycle mud guards aren't the hippest thing to brag about.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 02:37PM Report Comment
 

14. inbreda said...

IMO this is the problem with christian morals. It all depends on the ultimate judgment at the pearly gates. What he is effectively saying is that it is ok for us to be bad because the people further up the food chain are bad. Which makes a nonsense of morals. What he should be saying is that leaving judgment to god is a waste of time and people need to start putting a noose around the necks of <<>>>

I don't like apologist morals. I find them pathetic.

"The channel we've been tuned to is all frigid, blank and clear
Told what to eat and drink and buy and whom to hate and fear
POisoned by the fairy-tale, A capitalistic dream
Go to sleep, You're free and brave, and on the winning team"

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 02:54PM Report Comment
 

15. shipbuilder said...

Rumble, a citizen's wage isn't benefits, but as I said a reflection of each citizen's ownership of their own country. What they do with it is their choice. Would living off the land and providing for oneself be parasitic? Only if someone else had a 'claim' to that land. Should individuals be able to claim parts of the earth? Should someone have to buy land to be able to feed their family? That's the question. But the systems we have now are unlikely to be changed. Land value tax (replacing other taxes) would provide the citizen's income and of course increases in land value aren't earned by individuals, so you wouldn't be losing out. Of course rich people would get it as well, but then they would be paying out most of the LVT as they own the land.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 03:20PM Report Comment
 

16. shipbuilder said...

The 'need' to steal comes from the top in any society, both by example and by inequality. Perhaps stealing could be seen as reclaiming what was stolen as birth. Moral absolutes are fine for those who can feed themselves and their children.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 03:25PM Report Comment
 

17. cat and canary said...

Hi Happy Mondays!!,

yeah, see your point. There's a difference between a thief who doesn't know better and a thieving user/manipulator!!

Personally, I love talking to manipulators!!! Especially the ones who cold call..!! Cos the point about manipulators is that they are already aware that their actions disadvantage their target. Hence, I really do enjoy just bluntly exposing their scheme out in the open, and then let them try to justify them to me! Much better than not acknowledging that you are aware of their manipulations!

RBS bankers are another thing! They take taxpayers money. Then take more! Then try to justify to us why they should be paid a bonus! Pushing back against this is the only solution.

===

Inbreda

This priest isn't really very aware of his own religious teachings, which was supposed to be about self-sacrifice in the face of injustice and so on. Which is one reason why i'm agnostic, I have a hard time reconciling unconditional self-sacrifice at any levels, so I choose to sit on the fence, even though my family are religious scholars/nuts! But I still advocate spreading justice wherever possible, out of social practicality.

===

rumble,

haha, loved command and conquer!! what a game! wasn't rumble one of the transformers?! :)

Sorry about your mud guard! Thieving monkeys! You prob right about londoner's "redistribution rights" but I guess it boils down to similar mechanisms of self-preservation out of mistrust for others.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 03:28PM Report Comment
 

18. crunchy said...

It is not the governments job to ensure theft is always one sided. It's the class system stupid!

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 03:31PM Report Comment
 

19. crunchy said...

Is it not, even. Must keep social order.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 03:34PM Report Comment
 

20. clockslinger said...

Inevitably we degenerate into a critique of what is wrong with the welfare state which usually goes along the lines of "why should ( an astronomically small percentage of) my hard eared money go to a chav to buy crack", which isn't really worth answering. However, it is obvious that most of my fellow citizens (with the notable exception of Mr. Shipbuilder) find it fairly unobjectionable that those at the top take many multiples more that they neither "earn", "need" or "deserve" to spend on houses they don't live in, food they don't eat, expensive education their children are not bright enough to benefit from and spend the rest on anything they like. Such persons never even consider the corrosive effect of such a massive gap in society, let alone possible connection with creation of said loathsome chav.
There is no justice, only law.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 05:06PM Report Comment
 

21. clockslinger said...

Inevitably we degenerate into a critique of what is wrong with the welfare state which usually goes along the lines of "why should ( an astronomically small percentage of) my hard eared money go to a chav to buy crack", which isn't really worth answering. However, it is obvious that most of my fellow citizens (with the notable exception of Mr. Shipbuilder) find it fairly unobjectionable that those at the top take many multiples more that they neither "earn", "need" or "deserve" to spend on houses they don't live in, food they don't eat, expensive education their children are not bright enough to benefit from and spend the rest on anything they like. Such persons never even consider the corrosive effect of such a massive gap in society, let alone possible connection with creation of said loathsome chav.
There is no justice, only law.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 05:06PM Report Comment
 

22. letthemfall said...

I think there are a few of us here who object to the power of large companies collectively to impoverish a section of society - a growing section. Of course there are plenty of others who come out with the old saws about private sector efficiency, low taxes and all the other tried and failed nonsense that are part of the slanted economic infrastructure. Still, an appropriate discussion for the season. Happy Christmas.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 05:27PM Report Comment
 

23. rumble said...

Shippy, you've given me food for thought. I was almost sold, but was interrupted by a friend reporting (or confessing) her behaviour that would have the priest shaking his head. Or would it? I think I'm done with thinking for today, but may revisit after beer. Assuming they'll let me ride my high horse into the bar!

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 05:40PM Report Comment
 

24. rumble said...

"It is not the governments job to ensure theft is always one sided." Sometimes you manage paint a picture far bigger than the sentence.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 05:51PM Report Comment
 

25. rumble said...

Shippy, I'm sold. Nice. I've written a number of long responses, and this is all I have to show for it!

Wikipedia...
"The Welfare State of the United Kingdom was prefigured in the William Beveridge Report in 1942, which identified five "Giant Evils" in society: squalor, ignorance, want, idleness and disease.

Clement Attlee's 1945 Labour government pledged to eradicate these Evils. The government undertook measures in policy to provide for the people of the United Kingdom "from the cradle to the grave."

This policy resulted in massive expenditure and a great widening of what was considered to be the state's responsibility.
"

Those five evils were identified mid-world war - ridiculous, what do they expect in that chaos - justifies the "necessity" of the welfare state.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 08:49PM Report Comment
 

26. devo said...

three out of five ain't bad, I suppose

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 09:12PM Report Comment
 

27. rumble said...

3?

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 09:31PM Report Comment
 

28. rumble said...

sorry, agreed, lalaland, although the mechanism for want is a bit buckled.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 09:34PM Report Comment
 

29. devo said...

3?

progress has been made with regards to squalor, want and disease.

progress in overcoming ignorance has been marginal at best

idleness has increased

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 09:37PM Report Comment
 

30. devo said...

feel free to contradict me... i'll go easy on you

thread starter becomes thread killer... what's the odds on that, eh?

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:15PM Report Comment
 

31. rumble said...

Erm, I agree. Ok, I'll disagree over the ignorance. Exams easier, people goofing off in front of reality shows whereas previously goofing off would have involved reality. People have been subjected to more political lies. I'm struggling, and I dare not mention the world wide ***.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:50PM Report Comment
 

32. devo said...

31. rumble said... 'I'll disagree over the ignorance... exams easier"

exams easier? - undoubtedly, but this has little if anything to do with measuring the ignorance of the dispossessed.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:11AM Report Comment
 

33. devo said...

rumble said... I dare not mention the world wide web

Ah yes... the internet.

THE power for good or evil.

But what will it be?

I say it will be a power for good.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:18AM Report Comment
 

34. devo said...

Why are little baby cherubs usually armed with bows and arrows?

Surely, AK-47s would be more appropriate for the coming decade?

Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:23AM Report Comment
 

35. rumble said...

Uh, because the cherubs stand for peace, love and happiness. They're not being recruited for civil unrest.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:34AM Report Comment
 

36. devo said...

35. rumble said... Uh, because the cherubs stand for peace, love and happiness. They're not being recruited for civil unrest

ah, of course, the bow and arrow: the hystorical symbol of peace!

sorry, i said i'd go easy on you: my bad

Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:38AM Report Comment
 

37. rumble said...

the arrows are symbols of love. Don't ask me, I didn't conjure these fellas. Tradition. Like Darlings little budget briefcase.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:56AM Report Comment
 

38. devo said...

37. rumble said ... the arrows are symbols of love, like Darling's little budget briefcase

Well, if it works for you, who am I to argue?

Thursday, December 24, 2009 01:06AM Report Comment
 

39. rumble said...

No, it does nothing for me. For chocolatiers I guess.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 01:32AM Report Comment
 

40. devo said...

OK... let's move on...

Do you think that WW3 is now inevitable?

Thursday, December 24, 2009 01:59AM Report Comment
 

41. rumble said...

Hmm... if the power elite want slaves, then they'd be better off not wiping them out.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:30AM Report Comment
 

42. rumble said...

i expected israel to strike iran before the nuke capability is achieved, but with the US surge in afghanistan, that seems to be prep for a strike on iran, maybe to reduce claims of it being a religious strike.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:35AM Report Comment
 

43. rumble said...

with globalisation, the people at the top are forming a little boys club, each with resources dependent on another's resources, more like departments within a company rather than competing companies, i think they'll suppress little troublemakers like mahmoud, and keep peace with each other.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:43AM Report Comment
 

44. devo said...

42. rumble said... i expected israel to strike iran before the nuke capability is achieved

Once sides are taken, existing nuclear capability of the protagonist nation states is irrelevant.

NB: I'm not convinced that our 'leaders' realise that; incredible as it may seem!

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:43AM Report Comment
 

45. devo said...

43. rumble said... with globalisation, the people at the top are forming a little boys club

would this be the 'new world order' that the conspiraloons used to talk about?

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:48AM Report Comment
 

46. rumble said...

I guess a merging of countries would start taking place, away from the EU, they'd still keep their names and flags, but it's superficial, same laws, open travel, the president of each country reporting to the same bloke. But i'm knackered, so maybe talking tripe, and am certainly going to bed.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:50AM Report Comment
 

47. rumble said...

i guess there would be the public characters, and there'd be people off stage with money and influence who have some sway over the public characters. the natural setup as always.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:52AM Report Comment
 

48. devo said...

46. rumble said... I guess a merging of countries would start taking place, away from the EU, they'd still keep their names and flags, but it's superficial, same laws, open travel, the president of each country reporting to the same bloke.

Sounds good... as long as the right 'bloke' was in charge.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:53AM Report Comment
 

49. rumble said...

politicians use the 'new world order' differently to the theorists. politicians mean structure of society, theorists mean a secret order of people running the show.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:55AM Report Comment
 

50. rumble said...

AK47's, WW3.... feeling restless?

Thursday, December 24, 2009 02:56AM Report Comment
 

51. rumble said...

This person is an optimist. Been arguing religion with my dear deluded sister for decades. Futile.

Thursday, December 24, 2009 03:00AM Report Comment
 

52. devo said...

AK47's, WW3.... feeling restless?

yes

very

as a pacifist by nature, that should worry people

Thursday, December 24, 2009 03:00AM Report Comment
 

53. devo said...

try this,,,,

i've reclassified myself as a theist agnostic

http://freethinker.co.uk/2009/09/25/8419/

Thursday, December 24, 2009 03:04AM Report Comment
 

54. rumble said...

I'm atheist gnostic!

Thursday, December 24, 2009 01:54PM Report Comment
 

55. This comment has been removed as it was found to be in breach of our Blog Policies.

 

Add comment

  • If you do not have an admin password leave the password field blank.
  • If you would like to request a password allowing you to add comments and blog news articles without needing each one approved manually, send an e-mail to the webmaster.
  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user's views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines
Username  
Admin Password
Email Address
Comments

Main Blog | Archive | Add Article | Blog Policies