Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Bankers bonus bleat

Banks hit by 50% tax on bonus payouts

The 50% is on top of the marginal rate, so pretty hefty as it should be. But the banks already trying to wangle things, pleading how hard they work, etc etc

Posted by letthemfall @ 01:31 PM (1746 views)
Please complete the required fields.



10 thoughts on “Bankers bonus bleat

  • Only for thoses who declare their bonuses in the UK, I suspect.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • This should have been extended to salaries and benefits in kind as several banks are simply shifting away from bonus onto basic salary and increasing benefits in kind such as paying school fees.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • Can you post the whole article, as the FT website says i can’t access this? (cheers)

    ….are those bankers going to be able to escape paying this? I bloody hope not – we should have let Halifax, etc, etc, go bust (the government could have covered the deposits and pensions, etc at a far lower cost)

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • FTSE loving it. Presumably LSE will pull the plug in a minute.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • FTSE 100 is virtually unchanged at 1600 hrs but FTSE250 is down 1%

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • True. I know how to pick ’em!

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • I read that it only applies until April 5, so presumably the bankers will just ask for this year’s bonus to be delayed by a few months. The purpose is probably to keep headlines about big bonuses out of the papers for a while.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • The UK has a narrow tax base, the top 5% pay very nearly 50% of income tax. So actually there is a fairly big risk to government revenue should people move.

    As a circular aside, the 5% in the UK have typically made their money by booking profits based on issuing debt, which is now guaranteed by the government, as there is insufficient economy to warrant the excessive debt issuance.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • I mean, more specifically, if we lose 1% (20% attrition) within that group because they domicile, fiddle, or otherwise make the effort to sidestep the increased tax, then the government loses 10% of income tax revenue.

    So the problem, as has been stated many times, is that increasing high taxes reduces revenue. Labour did this purely to appeal to their idiot voter base and will be lucky to get even a minimal irrelevant rise in revenue while risking a dramatic drop.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • The UK has a narrow tax base, the top 5% pay very nearly 50% of income tax. So actually there is a fairly big risk to government revenue should people move.

    As a circular aside, the 5% in the UK have typically made their money by booking profits based on issuing debt, which is now guaranteed by the government, as there is insufficient economy to warrant the excessive debt issuance.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



Add a comment

  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>