Wednesday, November 4, 2009

How long can it go on for

House prices go up again, but fears grow that economy cannot sustain rise

Hopefully not another thread of 80 youcopy posts coming, it would be interesting to see where we think (in the real world, not the Armageddon world) the next months will go - and why. I can see the tidal wave of insolvencies getting hold and the laying off of staff growing to eventually swamp all these green shoots.

Posted by growler @ 07:36 AM (1476 views)
Please complete the required fields.



19 thoughts on “How long can it go on for

  • Best take some more guidance from the Zimbabwean Central Bank and print more moohney!

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • “fears grow that economy cannot sustain rise.”

    Growler, spot the delibrate mistake in that sentence.

    Strange wave action before the numchucks hit and the big rent book is issued.

    Be prepared to wait for quiet some time untill they are ready for you to sign it..

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • it_is_going_with_a_bang says:

    House prices have a rise when interest rates are still at an emergency unrealistic low – not exactly suprising if it were true – that is the whole point of the policy. I still find it odd that the price of the most expensive purchase of your life “going up” is cheered on considered fantastic news by the population as a whole.

    Fuel protests, food price protests. poll tax riots all over fairly small amounts of money in comparison to stuffing people in the future with a lifetime of debt to buy a property to basically live in. All anyone considers nowadays with mortgages is the interest rate and not actually how much it will cost to pay it all back.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • @3 ; it’s going…

    at the end of the day, UK culture says that you need your “own” house, and it’s good news when that house goes up in value. People out of the market (like me since June 2007) look forward to falling prices – but we’re a VERY small minority. Everyone else makes a statement about house prices based on subjectivism. Either they live in one they own, or they earn money from them. Simply put, if you’re a diary farmer, higher milk prices are good. And if I end up buying in a couple of years, I challenge myself not to express the basic of all human traits.

    You can see from the wavering bears on here that it’s a tough challenge to be fully objective. Of houses, I’d challenge anyone to say that they are – including me.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • brownsters_billions says:

    I think again it comes down to the difference between living in a house, and ‘investing’ in one. If you plan to live in one, then in 25 years you’ll pay it off (assuming you don’t go interest only, but that’s another story), and you’ll own your house, and it really doesn’t matter what you paid or what it’s worth.

    If you ‘invest’ in property, then you assume that it should rise in value and future generations should pay more to live here than you do, which is neither fair nor sustainable.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • 5. brownsters_billions said…If you ‘invest’ in property, then you assume that it should rise in value and future generations should pay more to live here than you do, which is neither fair nor sustainable.

    The banks make nothing from property when handed down through generations one way or another.

    What a shame then, that people have to sell to fund a pitiful pension????

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • @5 Brownster. Trouble is – and that’s my point – it is a false dichotemy. I challenge the majority of Brits who live in a house they own in the UK to say “it’s only a house to live in, what’s all the fuss about?”. EVERYONE buys because they think it’s a good deal. NOONE buys because they think in 25 years it doesn’t matter what it cost or what it’s worth.

    I’m a serious bear HPC-er – and am pretty confident from my view in long-term industry – that we will see more property price falls

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • brownsters_billions says:

    @7 growler said “EVERYONE buys because they think it’s a good deal.”

    I’m about to buy and I don’t think it’s because it’s a good deal. I just want somewhere nice to live and start a family. In 5/10 years when we look to move, we’ll of paid a chunk off, and I genuinely think because of inflation and the general attitude to house prices in the country, the house will be the same price we paid for it (of course, in ‘real’ terms it will be worth less, but who cares if I’ve lived there for an eight of my life?)

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • happy mondays says:

    it_is_going_with_a_bang said…
    All anyone considers nowadays with mortgages is the interest rate and not actually how much it will cost to pay it all back.

    Yes, i find it hard to believe, people still get upto there eyeballs in debt, because of a low interest rate…
    People are Crazy..

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • Over their heads, happy mondays.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • brownsters_billions says:

    @10 crunchy

    We could take the mortgage at 12% interest rates. Is it over my head?

    I have no sympathy for people who get into trouble based on calculations at a low interest rate, but how many people really believe that interest rates aren’t going to rise? Not everyone is THAT stupid.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • cynicalsoothsayer says:

    Maybe the house price falls won’t occur until the economy turns and people need to move to be nearer to the new job created by the upturn?
    Otherwise they’re going to sit tight and not put their house on the market?

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • 11. brownsters_billions said…Not everyone is THAT stupid.

    I remain out on that one. I think you have timed buying about right (in this late stage). I think in the future one will need around 80% cash if

    not the total sum. For cash buyers and current homeowners this will not pose a future problem as long as they can afford interest rate

    fluctuations/employment gaps. However, for the FTBer I feel it will be a case of finding the most stable and permanent place to rent.

    I think that the banks, rather than selling on will slowly move into the renting of their property stock. This may be intergrated also with the

    government or indepentent housing Assiocations. Why? There is too much money to be lost in a crash of any real magnitude.

    This is global now. I will leave some other reasons out. If anybody does not like this that’s just tough. It’s my opinion.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • @8 Brownster.

    But this is the weird thing… where I am from (originally – been here for 35 years) people are quity happy to start families regardless if they rent or buy? Houses are generally bought at a much later age with a 50% deposit – when people know they won’t move house again. There ain’t no house price boom there – consequently this is no crash either.

    If interest rates are going to rise, so are savings rates. I also agree with Cynicalsoothsayer: unless you have to, there’s no incentive to move now.

    As to the maths: Right now, what I pay in rent is less than what I’d have to pay if I bought it interest only. I might as well pay the agent money than the bank and save all those nice bills like new boiler, washing machine, decorating, solictors, tax etc.

    The capital proportion would have to rise a whole lot more for the maths to work out. Since that isn’t likely in most scenarios, there really is no sensible reason to buy.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • brownsters_billions says:

    @14. growler “there really is no sensible reason to buy”

    Ah yes, but only if you look at the maths, and nothing else. Looking at the maths alone is probably what got us into this mess in the first place…

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • 🙂 Brownster….

    (spock voice) which proves that illogic defines house purchase (/spock voice)

    And I also think that had people really have looked at the maths (rather than the utopia of an perpetually properperous and painless purchase), we would NOT be in the mess we are.

    And the reason that people didn’t: It’s amazing what you can believe if your livelihood depends on it.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • stillthinking says:

    But the choice isn’tj just between buying a house or renting/saving. Both of these over the last two years have been chronically unsuccessful policies. Either you lose out as a saver in a devalued currency, or you lose out on a house price valuation(maybe offset by sterling debt value going down).

    Wealth has been lost in the UK by both groups.

    Once you get over the mental hurdle of renting/home “ownership” and that is out of the way, surely the decision of where to maintain possibly increase savings becomes a lot broader than simply a rent purchase decision on housing i.e. given the UK economy, political attitudes to sound money, I think the decision is whether or not the UK going forward provides an environment that offers the ability to save.
    The people who have really cleaned up are those who got out of housing and also got out of sterling, and looking at particularly sterling being below purchasing power parity for our fairly nearby neighbours, the consensus is currently that the UK is no longer a good bet for the future.

    A better choice, possibility anyway, it seems to me, would be to rent, get out of your company pension scheme if possible by asking to take your employer top up as salary, and save elsewhere just until things have calmed down and the possibility of a UK Iceland in 2010 has gone. Be cautious. For example, it is not even clear yet whether Labour will lose the next election, what the bank losses actually are, whether there will be a gilt strike. If you don’t know, steer entirely clear basically. Having said that it is entirely possible that sterling is oversold and will come back. But anyway it isn’t just houses and renting.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • ’14, Growler,
    I am a house owner but you are spot on.I understand the maths.
    If a house is worth £400000 and you can invest on a 5 year bond today at 5%, you would earn £20000 Gross and Net of £16000.
    If you can rent something for say £900 per month, the annual plus is £5200.
    What many people think is that there will be capital appreciation. I personally cannot see any appreciation from the peak of 2007 for the next 10 years.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • Was it something I said.

    Love it, Love it, love it!!!!

    This means that what I have writen today must be very close to the knuckle. NICE.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



Add a comment

  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>