Saturday, March 7, 2009

Rewarding the reckless

House approves mortgage bankruptcy overhaul

The policy measures are beginning to look more and more extreme. Isn't this simply forced wealth confiscation from creditors to debtors? I'm sure some African dictators would approve of these methods.

Posted by paul @ 11:38 AM (777 views)
Please complete the required fields.

2 thoughts on “Rewarding the reckless

  • Extreme? Lenders aren’t obliged to lend, and when they do they have to accept that lending has associated risk. It’s not “forced wealth confiscation”, they’ve taken a gamble to make a profit and they’ve lost.

    Is your issue with the concept of bankruptcy, or with the removal of the special treatment of the primary residence in bankruptcy cases?

    Please complete the required fields.

  • I don’t think you understand rich.

    This is using taxpayers money to ringfence losses that homeowners incur because of the falling value of their asset relative to the cost of their mortgage.

    It is effectively shielding gamblers from losing, using creditors’ money. That is extreme. And it is functionally no different to wealth confiscation.

    Don’t you think?

    Please complete the required fields.

Add a comment

  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>