Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Fun Online Poll

What kind of tax/economic system would you prefer?

For a given level of taxation (the lower the better, obviously), would you prefer: A) Low and stable house prices; lower taxes on incomes; and a steadily growing economy? or B) Wildly fluctuating house prices; higher taxes on incomes; and a boom-bubble-bust economy?

Posted by mark wadsworth @ 05:24 PM (2307 views)
Please complete the required fields.



8 thoughts on “Fun Online Poll

  • Hi mark. I voted for the one which is opposite to present government’s policy. No guessing needed then!

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • mark wadsworth says:

    Plato, thanks, the problem is that the Tories don’t have much more to offer than option B) either.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • mark w……..

    Yes we really need a breath of fresh air.
    They’ve had their chances and I am certainly not impressed by the pathetic opposition put up during the past few years.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • what a sad and poitnless poll ~~~ no choice

    Any system involving taxation and debt based moneu should be avoided.

    20. Economic crises have been produced by us for the GOYIM by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge capitals have stagnated, withdrawing money from States, which were constantly obliged to apply to those same stagnant capitals for loans. These loans burdened the finances of the State with the payment of interest and made them the bond slaves of these capitals …. The concentration of industry in the hands of capitalists out of the hands of small masters has drained away all the juices of the peoples and with them also the States …. (Now we know the purpose of the Federal Reserve Bank Corporation!!)

    TYRANNY OF USURY
    30. What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is – an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty – treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.

    31. From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealthy foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.

    32. So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary persons in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, (Woodrow Wilson and F.D. Roosevelt) all the wealth of States flowed into our cash-boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of subjects.

    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion6.htm#PROTOCOL%20No.%2020

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • and just for laughs

    2. We shall surround our government with a whole world of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form the principal subject of the teaching given to the *$%£s. Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and – THE MAIN THING – MILLIONAIRES, BECAUSE IN SUBSTANCE EVERYTHING WILL BE SETTLED BY THE QUESTION OF FIGURES.

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • on a lighter note ~~~
    Economic Shock Testing
    In recent times, the application of Operations Research to the study of the public economy has been obvious for anyone who understands the principles of shock testing.
    In the shock testing of an aircraft airframe, the recoil impulse of firing a gun mounted on that airframe causes shock waves in that structure which tell aviation engineers the conditions under which some parts of the airplane or the whole airplane or its wings will start to vibrate or flutter like a guitar string, a flute reed, or a tuning fork, and disintegrate or fall apart in flight.

    Economic engineers achieve the same result in studying the behavior of the economy and the consumer public by carefully selecting a staple commodity such as beef, coffee, gasoline, or sugar, and then causing a sudden change or shock in its price or availability, thus kicking everybody’s budget and buying habits out of shape.

    They then observe the shock waves which result by monitoring the changes in advertising, prices, and sales of that and other commodities.

    The objective of such studies is to acquire the know-how to set the public economy into a predictable state of motion or change, even a controlled self-destructive state of motion which will convince the public that certain “expert” people should take control of the money system and reestablish security (rather than liberty and justice) for all. When the subject citizens are rendered unable to control their financial affairs, they, of course, become totally enslaved, a source of cheap labor.

    Diversion, the Primary Strategy
    Experience has prevent that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of the basic system principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.
    This is achieved by:

    disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems design and economics; and discouraging technical creativity.

    engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence and their indulgence in emotional and physical activities, by:
    unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media – especially the T.V. and the newspapers.
    giving them what they desire – in excess – “junk food for thought” – and depriving them of what they really need.

    rewriting history and law and subjecting the public to the deviant creation, thus being able to shift their thinking from personal needs to highly fabricated outside priorities.
    These preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of social automation technology.
    The general rule is that there is a profit in confusion; the more confusion, the more profit. Therefore, the best approach is to create problems and then offer solutions.

    http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/index.shtml#twentythree

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • would you prefer peace, love dope and fluffy ducks, or jackbooted nazis smashing up your stuff?

    hmmm easy one that

    can’t we do better than this, guys?

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



  • little professor says:

    Yeah, it’s a bit of a lame question, sorry mark

    Reply
    Please complete the required fields.



Add a comment

  • Your email address is required so we can verify that the comment is genuine. It will not be posted anywhere on the site, will be stored confidentially by us and never given out to any third party.
  • Please note that any viewpoints published here as comments are user´s views and not the views of HousePriceCrash.co.uk.
  • Please adhere to the Guidelines

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>