Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Confounded

Interesting Analysis Of Last Fridays Shock Us Bureau Of Labor Statistics Reports

Recommended Posts

Why do the Wall Street pros with their phenomenal analytical army rely on Government Statistics to base there investment decisions and ultimately the direction of the DOW? Despite some of the statistic clearly being biased to the upside they seem to get regularly "revised" down after there initial release. This downward revisal invariably has little or no impact compared to when they were revealed in their earlier inflated state.

The analysis below looks into the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/economy/index.html

Regular readers of The Big Picture will recognize the sentiment presented below. Its a simple 3 part analysis: 1) The economy is soft; 2) Job creation is weak, and getting weaker; and 3) most of the shills you see on TV are idiots.

The following is via Alan Abelson's Barron's column, titled The Big Stall:

"For reasons that have invariably eluded us -- except that's what their paymasters tell them to do -- the incorrigible cheerleaders on Wall Street and in Washington have been insisting that the economy was strong, a sentiment, we regret to say, with few exceptions, mindlessly echoed by our colleagues in the press and in the electronic media. And by way of confirmation they cited the particular "strength" in employment.

Comes now Friday's employment report for August, and guess what? It's a bummer. Compared with the recently scaled-down consensus estimates of 90,000-100,000 additions, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that, in fact, last month saw a loss of 4,000 jobs. It looks like a long goodbye to Goldilocks. What's more, in another poke in the eye to the received wisdom, the job picture was much worse in both June and July than originally reported: Revisions slashed June by a whopping 57,000 slots and July by 24,000.

Nor is that the whole sad story. For were it not for the enhancement of August's sickly totals by a formidable 120,000 jobs mythically created by the BLS's "birth/death" contraption, the final tally would have been downright ugly. And the so-called household data, which bulls used to eagerly parade because it consistently outdid the establishment count, continued this year's dismal -- or, should we say, accurate -- performance, shedding 316,000 jobs last month.

What last month's dismal employment showing does is pretty much cinch the case for a cut in the federal-funds rate. It also, we think, pretty much cinches the case for recession, late this year or early next."

Hard to argue with most of that . . . and as mentioned recently, we think the odds of a recession are about 65%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 355 The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.