Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Justice

White People 'a Minority By 2027'

Recommended Posts

Full details

And experts have already forecast that Leicester could become the first city in which white people are a minority in four years' time.

Ludi Simpson, a social statistician at Manchester University, said the Pakistani population in Birmingham was likely to double by 2026, but with two-thirds of this increase due to the relatively younger age profile of Pakistanis, rather than increased immigration.

i come from Leicester and IMHO the whites are already a minority and it was considered racist to say we will be over run by immigrants but it's a matter of fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We will lose this country if we just stand by and do nothing.

Is that what our forefathers faught and died for? :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not even a mention of Bradistan!

I worked in Bradford about 20 years ago and everyone said it was worse than Leicester but i didn't think it was and it looks like i was right.

it's hard to get anything but hala meat in the city.

Curry's are better and cheaper in Bradford i thinks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Full details

i come from Leicester and IMHO the whites are already a minority and it was considered racist to say we will be over run by immigrants but it's a matter of fact.

I thought Leicester had become the first white minority city a few years back.

Only a matter of time till serious trouble IMO. The first rumblings of a campaign for an independent Muslim enclave will start over the next 15-20 years (and these people will mean business, not like the Cornish, who everyone just sees as a bit eccentric). We could be going at it Kosovo style (if anyone doesn't know the story of Kosovo they should read up, it;s a cautionary tale) within about 50 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought Leicester had become the first white minority city a few years back.

Only a matter of time till serious trouble IMO. The first rumblings of a campaign for an independent Muslim enclave will start over the next 15-20 years (and these people will mean business, not like the Cornish, who everyone just sees as a bit eccentric). We could be going at it Kosovo style (if anyone doesn't know the story of Kosovo they should read up, it;s a cautionary tale) within about 50 years.

The multicult brigade reffer to these kind of lost cities with no overall ethnic group as "plural cities" of course they won't stay that way for long.

The dream for the Serbian province of Kosovo was of a multi ethnic state - a plural state if you will. Except what has happened since Nato stuck it's nose in has been the opposite. The Albanians have ethnically cleansed all the other minorites from Kosovo under the watchful eyes of Nato. Ancient Churches and monastories have been burned and looted in a systematic attempt to wipe out 1,000's of years of Serbian history.

The choice we faced was simple - a Serbian Kosovo or an Albanian Kosova. Rather stupidly we sided with the Albanians and now have an Islamic Kleptostate in the heart of Europe.

We face a similar choice in our own country. A British Britain or a foreign one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought Leicester had become the first white minority city a few years back.

Thats because you have eyes and a brain that can count and you don't listen to the 24/7 propaganda being pumped out by the BBC.

The media would have us all beleive all this PC crap is working but if an Indian walks into certain parts of Highfields at night then they get a kicking and if Muslims go to certain parts of Belgrave then they get a kicking, whites don't even come into the equasition.

I think we will have blood on the streets but i don't think it will be the british public that starts it all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The dream for the Serbian province of Kosovo was of a multi ethnic state - a plural state if you will. Except what has happened since Nato stuck it's nose in has been the opposite. The Albanians have ethnically cleansed all the other minorites from Kosovo under the watchful eyes of Nato. Ancient Churches and monastories have been burned and looted in a systematic attempt to wipe out 1,000's of years of Serbian history.

The choice we faced was simple - a Serbian Kosovo or an Albanian Kosova. Rather stupidly we sided with the Albanians and now have an Islamic Kleptostate in the heart of Europe.

I agree, but the point is Kosovo was actually part of Serbia. There shouldn't have been a choice between Albanian or Serbian Kosovo. The ethnic Albanians only moved in in numbers after the first world war and outbred the native serbians 3:1. Within 3 generations the ethnic Albanians were in the majority and wanted an independent Kosovo. This is what I believe will eventually happen here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Full details

i come from Leicester and IMHO the whites are already a minority and it was considered racist to say we will be over run by immigrants but it's a matter of fact.

I don't know what it is....it's possibly the perpetual pointing out of these facts & the little tell-tale signs...like the use of the words: "over run".

Why aren't you complaining about the fact that the falkland Islands is over-run with British people & not Argentinians?..that's a matter of fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know what it is....it's possibly the perpetual pointing out of these facts & the little tell-tale signs...like the use of the words: "over run".

Why aren't you complaining about the fact that the falkland Islands is over-run with British people & not Argentinians?..that's a matter of fact.

It's obvious ain't it?

We don't live in the Falklands :unsure:

Not only that but Argentina, as far as I know has only ever claimed sovereignty over the Flaklands, but never officially had it. I think technically we have as much right to it as they have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps he's part of the approaching wave SC? :o:ph34r:

Yeah probably. The enemy is within the gates I'm afraid.

Nevermind - form square and give 'em steel! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well if they fought and died for this country making it their home, I don't think you have a point do you. <_<

Really? How many ethnics were part of these wars? I would like to know thats all and iirc, ethnics were the frontline soldiers???? all I am saying is that the forefathers using the idea of ethnic nationalism can have a wider context other than the point the OP was trying to get across???

I think I do have a point? contradicitons and loopholes galore in this "ethic nationalism" the OP believes in?? and I am pretty sure that the "forefathers" the OP refers to are white?

Otherwise, I agree, I have no point :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Really? How many ethnics were part of these wars? iirc, ethnics were the frontline soldiers????

I think I do have a point?

On whose side? :lol:

Are you saying that the ancient Britons imported ethnics to fight the Romans???

I supose Vortigern did import some Saxons to fight the Picts but I fail to see how that makes immigration of say Modern Albanians or Turks or Chinese acceptable.

Britons fought in a number of foreign armies over the centuries does that mean we should be granted the right to settle in those countries?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On whose side? :lol:

Are you saying that the ancient Britons imported ethnics to fight the Romans???

I supose Vortigern did import some Saxons to fight the Picts but I fail to see how that makes immigration of say Modern Albanians or Turks or Chinese acceptable.

Britons fought in a number of foreign armies over the centuries does that mean we should be granted the right to settle in those countries?

In a way yes :rolleyes: - Britannia was an ethnic combination of multiple (what is now) european identities before the break from the european mainland??? Do you agree with this???? So I find it very amusing that people like you talk about the heritage of the British as purely white when the identity is anything of Germanic (saxon etc), Irish, Dutch, Picts to name a few of the top of my head.... As we were coming from the ice age, skin colour would have been predominaltly white...... so anything from western Europe would have been of white skin colour...... But ultimatley to me meaning that British was and is a combination of European identities.

By your very own argument, the Picts had every right to call themselves British under the idea of "ethnic nationalisim" so I again say your argument is fundamentally flawed in using the Romans as an example for using Europeans to fight what is essentially Europeans.

The romans set the precedent for divide and conqour by creating this sibling rivalry that you refer to but the picts again by your argument had the very same right to Britain than what you are calling British.

So.... how do you know that the picts, saxons etc do not have any blood lines of say Albanians, Turks etc??? other than referring to HIStory?

<_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As always succinct and to the point.

:lol:

You make a lovely act!!!

Please carry on patting yourselves on one anothers back while eulogising "Bravo Bravo" Stiff upper lip and all that malarky!! :lol::lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In a way yes :rolleyes: - Britannia was an ethnic combination of multiple (what is now) european identities before the break from the european mainland??? Do you agree with this????

I don't know as I don't understand what point you're are trying to make here? That Britain before becoming seperated from the continent was had numerous tribes inhabiting it? Yes. However modern ethnic Britons are overwhelmingly the descendants of those hunter gatherers. This has been confirmed by many genetic studies.

So I find it very amusing that people like you talk about the heritage of the British as purely white when the identity is anything of Germanic (saxon etc), Irish, Dutch, Picts to name a few of the top of my head.... As we were coming from the ice age, skin colour would have been predominaltly white...... so anything from western Europe would have been of white skin colour...... But ultimatley to me meaning that British was and is a combination of European identities.

I've never claimed British heritage as being "purely white".

"Whiteness" is absolutely nothing to do with the Ice ages Mongloids are more specialised to icey climates than Caucasians.

I presume we can extend your ahem "arguement" to any nation on the planet. Turkish identity is anything from Celt, Greek, Roma, Armenian, Kurd, Arab, Serb etc or does this denial of identity only apply to Britain?

By your very own argument, the Picts had every right to call themselves British under the idea of "ethnic nationalisim" so I again say your argument is fundamentally flawed in using the Romans as an example for using Europeans to fight what is essentially Europeans.

The romans set the precedent for divide and conqour by creating this sibling rivalry that you refer to but the picts again by your argument had the very same right to Britain than what you are calling British.

Absolutely I accept the Picts as being a sub Group of the Britons. I think the only arguement is whether they were Goidelic or Brythonic in speech.

So.... how do you know that the picts, saxons etc do not have any blood lines of say Albanians, Turks etc??? other than referring to HIStory?

<_<

Holy crap! Heaven forbid we would consult history! Especially if it doesn't support our politically correct dogma eh? Have you any evidence to suggest they do? It's certainly possible that the odd Turk may have made their way to Britain but their genetic and cultural contribution would have been negligible. Same is true for the odd Brit that made their way to Anatolia. Neither invalidates eithers respective national identity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are deliberately missing the point and you know it. (Well, perhaps you don't?)

This argument about blood lines is the worst most ridiculous argument that the left have ever come up with.

We all know IF you go back far enough the seat (alledgedly) of 'civilisation' is some where in Africa.

Does that mean we are all Africans? Of course not, don't be so bloody stupid.

We know White Britains (stopping at the 1940's) were made up of people who were in the vast numbers were white in colour. (I'll leave the slave trade and Bristol and concentrate on this currently.)

This is a fact.

Now, those Britains came from all over Europe and indeed Norway, Sweden France and Germany etc etc.

The point you lefties ALWAYS miss, is that these poeple settled here and grew together to form their own indentities, with a common bond of Being in these isles.

Live with it.

The OP is reproducing a report from people more highly educated and with access to research budgets bigger than your outstanding mortgage I suggest.

If you don't like what they say fine, but as you don't live near Ealing, Burnley or Leicester and can't see the fruits of years of left wing migration poicies you come over as someone who is either ignorant of the facts or plainly doesn't have a strategic bone in his body.

Which is it I wonder, both I suspect.

And yes, I do respect SC views. I do differ with him about on the treatment of those which genuinely want to be British, but I would suggest taking Burnley, Southall & Leicester (to name but a few examples), support his take on life more than it does mine I'm afraid to say.

Hnece the numb of the argument, white people will be ethnically cleansed and those areas will take on a different 'foreign' culture to the one that had been there for hundreds of years previously.

But I susepct, that doesn't matter to people like you does it?

Denial is a hard pill to swallow and clearly I have touched a nerve :lol:

Sticks n stones my friend - and for you glass houses I feel is very apt and as for highly educated academics blah blah blah I am sure there are also very highly skilled academics which work to disprove what idiots like you sit around dreaming of all day long.

The fact that you can sit here and talk about we British being ethniclly cleansed when we have commited the very same atrocity but hide behind the idea of settlements etc is plausible at best and just as controversial as what is happening in the world today.

Migration has happened since day one, all I am doing is asking questions about the OP in order to "educate" myself more without having any blinkers on which I feel is what you are doing - with all due respect :rolleyes:

Maybe I need to be explain myself more???

The point you lefties ALWAYS miss, is that these poeple settled here and grew together to form their own indentities, with a common bond of Being in these isles.

Oh, I beg to differ.. Our heritage is a violent and turbulent one which has at all stages resulted in division so I guess I am right in saying that you are so self consumed with your white racial ideal of supremacy that you ignore the fact the this "combined bond of being" is nothing more than a paradox and a lie as we have always been divided by tribe, heritage etc and the fact that you have used this statement only reinfoces in my mind that you are talking ballcocks.

As for mass migration or a possible cross over in culture in England, I doubt this will happen for a whole a host of reasons and no, I do not like the idea of living like this, would you like your dummy back??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know as I don't understand what point you're are trying to make here? That Britain before becoming seperated from the continent was had numerous tribes inhabiting it? Yes. However modern ethnic Britons are overwhelmingly the descendants of those hunter gatherers. This has been confirmed by many genetic studies.

:rolleyes: Here we go again... I too dont understand the point that you are trying to make as all you do is go round in circles making things fit with what you say.

I've never claimed British heritage as being "purely white".

Care to expand on what is British then please?

I think the only arguement is whether they were Goidelic or Brythonic in speech.

Holy crap! Heaven forbid we would consult history! Especially if it doesn't support our politically correct dogma eh? Have you any evidence to suggest they do?

Have you!! Please share :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeap carry on because it would appear you really do need to. <_<

Maybe you should take some of your own medicene then? instead of having your head so far up someones ar5e that you cannot speak or see anything beyond your twisted and maladjusted way of life.

The academics you refer to are the same that have created history to suit your bullsh!te cause so maybe you need to go back to school and get an education? and chich good academic is it that you are reffering to? the celt? please.

Misguided and unfounded points seem to be your speciality, I note there are numerous courses which maybe of your intellect or your aptitude so maybe you should hop along to your nearest induction day and have a mooch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I consider myself a citizen of the world.

Groan :rolleyes: Another daft liberal.

Why don't you go and see how many countries will allow you to just move in? Go and try it with, perhaps, India or Japan or... When they tell you to f*ck off just explain to them that you are a 'citizen of the world' :lol::lol::lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe you should take some of your own medicene then? instead of having your head so far up someones ar5e that you cannot speak or see anything beyond your twisted and maladjusted way of life.

The academics you refer to are the same that have created history to suit your bullsh!te cause so maybe you need to go back to school and get an education? and chich good academic is it that you are reffering to? the celt? please.

Misguided and unfounded points seem to be your speciality, I note there are numerous courses which maybe of your intellect or your aptitude so maybe you should hop along to your nearest induction day and have a mooch?

Can't you lefties even spell?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice to see you back WWW!

Where have you been?

Collecting guns and beans again for the great societal breakdown? ;)

Hi Bull

Been on holiday in Croatia, very nice to get out of this hellhole for a couple of weeks.

Seems to be no end to these daft lefties though. Where do they all go to have their brains removed? Wittering on about there being no such thing as British, citizens of the world, a foreigner moved to Britain 500 years ago so therefore all foreigners can live here now... I reckon half of them must be immigrants because I can't believe that many stupid Brits exist.

Couple more generations and we will break up just like Yugoslavia, thanks to these half-wits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AuntJess

I can't help feeling annoyed that so many petty despots in Europe tried to conquer this little island, and the Nu. Labs have handed it to them on a plate. If this was a banana republic, their heads would be on sticks by now, as a warning to other traitors. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 349 The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.