Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
huw

A Blast From The Past

Recommended Posts

In November 2005 the Scottish Executive suspended council house sales for a period of five years due to a shortage of affordable housing.

ok gordo, you got that? to tackle the shortage of affordable housing, why not stop GIVING THEM AWAY. 'high intellect' my ****

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only problem I have with selling off old council stock is that they don't build new properties to replace the stuff they're getting rid of. Why would the council want to hold onto and maintain a 1950's property when they can sell it and use the proceeds to build a new one. Also the council should have more power to build on land that no other developer would get permission on - stuff the NIMBY's!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only problem I have with selling off old council stock is that they don't build new properties to replace the stuff they're getting rid of.

But that was the whole point. 'Right to buy' was introduced because Thatcher didn't like people being reliant on the council for their housing, because it meant they kept voting for Labour councils.

Why should people who've had cheap rent for years in a council house then get a right to buy it at a discounted price when the people who've paid to subsidise them have to pay full price for their house? It's just another way of buying votes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why should people who've had cheap rent for years in a council house then get a right to buy it at a discounted price when the people who've paid to subsidise them have to pay full price for their house? It's just another way of buying votes.

I agree the discounts are very generous but I don't have a problem with off-loading old properties slightly BMV (as long as they replace them with new ones).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree the discounts are very generous but I don't have a problem with off-loading old properties slightly BMV (as long as they replace them with new ones).

That perhaps... but if they can afford to buy for slightly below the market value, they shouldn't have been getting a subsidised rent off the council in the first place!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That perhaps... but if they can afford to buy for slightly below the market value, they shouldn't have been getting a subsidised rent off the council in the first place!

But it would be a good way of off-loading old stock onto them. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think like anything else there's an upside and a downside to this. My parents have lived on a council estate for over35 years,they have mainly had wonderful neighbours , they bought at a discounted price. Most of the estate is now owner occupied and somewhat better for it, some of the housing was very abused and left in a terrible state by rough tenants. It seemed such a shame that so many responsible renters had to put up with them. Now the ex-social housing rough squad have moved into private renting and the problem renters are all over the place. Maybe it would have better to kep them all in one place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AuntJess
I agree the discounts are very generous but I don't have a problem with off-loading old properties slightly BMV (as long as they replace them with new ones).

If memory serves, 1950's council houses are one-up on modern ones in that they are roomier. THey have the disadvantage of needing updating - wiring etc, but they are a bigger family home, IMO, and compare favourably to some detached "executive" ones I have seen in recent years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ok gordo, you got that? to tackle the shortage of affordable housing, why not stop GIVING THEM AWAY. 'high intellect' my ****

If there is such a shortage of council houses, why can Spanish citizens walk of a plane and get them ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If memory serves, 1950's council houses are one-up on modern ones in that they are roomier. THey have the disadvantage of needing updating - wiring etc, but they are a bigger family home, IMO, and compare favourably to some detached "executive" ones I have seen in recent years.

The first house I bought in the UK was a 2-bed 1970s ex-council in Ealing, back in 1994. A tidy, solid, well-designed property. I doubt if it's needed significant maintenance to this day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If memory serves, 1950's council houses are one-up on modern ones in that they are roomier. THey have the disadvantage of needing updating - wiring etc, but they are a bigger family home, IMO, and compare favourably to some detached "executive" ones I have seen in recent years.

Fancy helping me at the weekend? I'm currently rebuilding the shot drainage system at my parents 1950's ex-council house. The materials used may be better than new builds but the workmanship is just as shoddy and this has a big effect on a property as the years wear on. One thing that is very worrying about 1950's council properties is the weakness of the mortar due to too much sand and not enough cement... plenty of pointing-up required throughout the country and the council would be best getting rid of the problem and investing the money building new stock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The first house I bought in the UK was a 2-bed 1970s ex-council in Ealing, back in 1994. A tidy, solid, well-designed property. I doubt if it's needed significant maintenance to this day.

1970's properties shouldn't require any maintenance - they're only 37 years old at the most. Any work required should be purely cosmetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 354 The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.