Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Climate Change,


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442
11 minutes ago, smash said:

So you're like a climate scientist then?

There's no reason I couldn't have been one.

I'm not even sure you can do a degree in Climate Science.  If you can it's a very recent invention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
1 hour ago, kzb said:

Let's just say I am scientifically qualified, which is one step up on the leader of the Green Party (English), the secretary of state for BEIS (Classics and History) and the Chairman of the UK's independent Committee on Climate Change (History).

I'm pretty sure the Green Party leader has a history working in mechanical engineering.

Nice of them to let her have a go without any science...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
41 minutes ago, byron78 said:

I'm pretty sure the Green Party leader has a history working in mechanical engineering.

Nice of them to let her have a go without any science...

 

I was thinking of that Caroline Lucas.  The current co-leader is indeed a mechanical engineering graduate.  Worked in renewable energy consultancy -vested interest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
1 hour ago, kzb said:

Here is a true climate scientist, background in physics and meteorology, ex-NASA, have a look at the video.

https://gript.ie/the-science-is-not-settled-irish-climate-scientist-speaks-out/

This guy? https://www.desmog.com/2017/11/10/victory-journalist-accuracy-complaint-contrarian-climate-scientist-thrown-out/

Super weird that he raised a press complaint about being described as a climate change denier... 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
1 hour ago, PeanutButter said:

This guy? https://www.desmog.com/2017/11/10/victory-journalist-accuracy-complaint-contrarian-climate-scientist-thrown-out/

Super weird that he raised a press complaint about being described as a climate change denier... 🙄

So a bunch of journalists (with hardly a science O' level between them I bet) know better than a professor of meteorology?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
1 hour ago, PeanutButter said:

Have a good long think about providing us with your credentials for knowing MORE about the earth's climate than NASA

B) 

I can critically evaluate material.  That is enough, you should try it some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
8 minutes ago, kzb said:

So a bunch of journalists (with hardly a science O' level between them I bet) know better than a professor of meteorology?

Hey, it's questioning the orthodox, religiously accepted truth!

And there's the problem, the attitude is very much one of religious zealotry. Even though I'm in (rough) agreement with it the dogmatic approach to this, and many other issues, is bloody disturbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
11 minutes ago, kzb said:

So a bunch of journalists (with hardly a science O' level between them I bet) know better than a professor of meteorology?

 

Or, retired jumped-up weather forecaster (with hardly any other scientists in agreement) knows better than an Irish judge?

I mean, I've met qualified doctors who also swear by crystals and/or various Gods.

Someone being qualified doesn't always mean they're rational.

Bates reminds me of many an old boy like myself who, up until a few years ago at least, could simply never be wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
5 minutes ago, byron78 said:

Or, retired jumped-up weather forecaster (with hardly any other scientists in agreement) knows better than an Irish judge?

I mean, I've met qualified doctors who also swear by crystals and/or various Gods.

Someone being qualified doesn't always mean they're rational.

Bates reminds me of many an old boy like myself who, up until a few years ago at least, could simply never be wrong. 

On the other hand, science is not a democracy.  And, it is never settled, otherwise it is not science.

Anyway, he says himself that he counts as one of the 97% of climate scientists.  He's obviously more than a jumped up weather forecaster.  He has publications in peer-reviewed climate science journals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
14 minutes ago, Riedquat said:

Hey, it's questioning the orthodox, religiously accepted truth!

And there's the problem, the attitude is very much one of religious zealotry. Even though I'm in (rough) agreement with it the dogmatic approach to this, and many other issues, is bloody disturbing.

The professor, in common with many other scientists, is basically saying the science is not settled.  Having looked into it a bit myself I can see this is true.  I can make a judgement based on what I read.  Even many "climate scientists" are now saying their models run too hot.

They are questioning the climate sensitivity.  Bates' own work found it to be 1 degree.  The IPCC say it is likely somewhere between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees, but they carefully excluded Bates and other workers from their literature search who found lower values.  Also, saying it is somewhere between 1.5 and 4.5 hardly says it is settled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
2 hours ago, PeanutButter said:

Have a good long think about providing us with your credentials for knowing MORE about the earth's climate than NASA

B) 

Question:  what are you doing about the property rentals you own with respect to carbon zero?

(You've neglected to say whether you really wanted to double UK domestic energy prices as well.)

What are your plans for installing heat pumps and cladding for insulation?  Are you going to install solar panels and battery storage so that your tenants can have some security of supply?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
50 minutes ago, byron78 said:

Or, retired jumped-up weather forecaster (with hardly any other scientists in agreement) knows better than an Irish judge?

Being in disagreement with a majority of other scientists on a matter of your speciality raises questions (although not enough alone to get the crackpot label). Being in disagreement with a judge does not, whether they're Irish or from anywhere else. When it comes to scientific matters being qualified as a judge means about as much as being an HPC poster.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
58 minutes ago, Riedquat said:

Hey, it's questioning the orthodox, religiously accepted truth!

And there's the problem, the attitude is very much one of religious zealotry. Even though I'm in (rough) agreement with it the dogmatic approach to this, and many other issues, is bloody disturbing.

John Gibbons (the journalist behind the article being judged) sounds like a nasty piece of work, as well as having no relevant qualifications.  Just Google him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
2 minutes ago, Riedquat said:

Being in disagreement with a majority of other scientists on a matter of your speciality raises questions (although not enough alone to get the crackpot label). Being in disagreement with a judge does not, whether they're Irish or from anywhere else. When it comes to scientific matters being qualified as a judge means about as much as being an HPC poster.

 

The ombudsman was actually at great pains to state it was not his job to judge on the veracity or not of man made climate change.  The complaint failed only because the ombudsman could not find an instance where the article had specifically called Bates a denier.  It only associated him with deniers, which is not the same thing.  They got off on a technicality really.

He did imply that Bates could have a valid complaint under ageism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
5 hours ago, kzb said:

Let's just say I am scientifically qualified, which is one step up on the leader of the Green Party (English),

Carla Denyer, leader of Green Party of England and Wales, has a Mechanical Engineering Degree from Durham University, and experience working as an engineer for a Wind Energy Company. 
 

You are right to say she is not a climate scientist.  However, I suspect you are wrong to say she is less of a climate scientist than you are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
12 minutes ago, kzb said:

The ombudsman was actually at great pains to state it was not his job to judge on the veracity or not of man made climate change.  The complaint failed only because the ombudsman could not find an instance where the article had specifically called Bates a denier.  It only associated him with deniers, which is not the same thing.  They got off on a technicality really.

They didn't actually call him a climate change "denier" but rather posed some sort of presumably weak association with that group. I would suggest that's no more a "technicality" than being found innocent a "technicality".

14 minutes ago, kzb said:

He did imply that Bates could have a valid complaint under ageism.

 

Quote

Finally, the Ombudsman decides that the only prejudice that Bates’ complaint could refer to is that of his age, and that “there is no evidence that Professor Bates’ age was a factor in the magazine’s reporting of the issues”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
5 hours ago, kzb said:

I'm not even sure you can do a degree in Climate Science.  If you can it's a very recent invention.

You could do a degree in ecological and environmental science (which included a section on atmosphere and climate)  at the university I went to.  And that was last century. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
1 hour ago, kzb said:

The professor, in common with many other scientists, is basically saying the science is not settled.  Having looked into it a bit myself I can see this is true.  I can make a judgement based on what I read.  Even many "climate scientists" are now saying their models run too hot.

They are questioning the climate sensitivity.  Bates' own work found it to be 1 degree.  The IPCC say it is likely somewhere between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees, but they carefully excluded Bates and other workers from their literature search who found lower values.  Also, saying it is somewhere between 1.5 and 4.5 hardly says it is settled.

So you're saying that science (as it currently stands, unsettled) should not inform policy? If so then why are you complaining about MPs and policy makers not being scientifically qualified?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425
4 minutes ago, 14stFlyer said:

Carla Denyer, leader of Green Party of England and Wales, has a Mechanical Engineering Degree from Durham University, and experience working as an engineer for a Wind Energy Company. 
 

You are right to say she is not a climate scientist.  However, I suspect you are wrong to say she is less of a climate scientist than you are. 

Engineering is not really a science.  It uses scientific principles, but true science is actually all about scepticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information