Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

I told you.


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442
7 minutes ago, Locke said:

It's so absurd. That is a measure of equality and not poverty.

You know it’s absurd. I know it’s absurd. Everyone who thinks about it knows it’s absurd. However IIWII.  
The question is how does it affect HPs. It helps keeps them huge.

Well, let’s see, with higher inflation and unemployment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
On 22/05/2020 at 12:08, zugzwang said:

If only, if only... :(

jeremy-corbyn.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

 

A Marxist in No. 10 would solve the nation's problems?

 

(I can't quite read the writing on the wall behind his arm, but it looks very much like Shaft The Future.)

Edited by mrpleasant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446
33 minutes ago, mrpleasant said:

A Marxist in No. 10 would solve the nation's problems?

 

(I can't quite read the writing on the wall behind his arm, but it looks very much like Shaft The Future.)

Corbyn isn't a Marxist. The 2019 manifesto advocated a mixed market economy, firmly within the tradition of the European mainstream Left.

Marx was the last great Classical economist. IIRC he coined the phrase 'Classical Economics', though he'd have smarted at the idea of an association with Adam Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
1 hour ago, mrpleasant said:

A Marxist in No. 10 would solve the nation's problems?

We have Socialists in Govt, so not much difference.

Edited by Killer Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
1 hour ago, captainb said:

Well yes, its a mistake to read poverty these days and assume people don't have enough to eat or for clothes etc

Really? With record numbers using food-banks and kids going hungry during the school holidays you might want to think that again.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/16/boris-johnson-faces-tory-rebellion-over-marcus-rashfords-school-meals-call

Quote

The footballer Marcus Rashford has stepped up his campaign to pressure the UK government into feeding hungry children during the school holidays, buoyed by support from Conservative MPs, businesses and celebrities.

On Tuesday morning, the Manchester United player began tweeting about the UK’s poorest families, who cannot afford to pay their water and electricity bills or put food on the table.

The prime minister faces a growing rebellion after he rejected the 22-year-old’s demand to extend its free school meal voucher scheme through the summer holidays

Robert Halfon, the chair of the education select committee, was one of a number of senior Tories to support Rashford.

Speaking on BBC Breakfast, Halfon commended the government for helping vulnerable families by raising the living wage, cutting taxes for lower earners and extending the freeze on fuel duty.

But he said carrying on with the free school meals programme “would be the right thing to do” as the latest figures show “2.5 million children are not learning” while away from school and food insecurity has “nearly doubled”.

Halfon added: “There are lots of food programmes across different government departments. If they just consolidated those programmes, they would almost have the money for the free school meals programme over the summer, which would cost roughly £110m.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
1 minute ago, zugzwang said:

Really? With record numbers using food-banks and kids going hungry during the school holidays you might want to think that again.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/16/boris-johnson-faces-tory-rebellion-over-marcus-rashfords-school-meals-call

 

That was in relation to the Hong Kong definition.

As for kids going hungry in the school holidays - look up all the available benefits for those with zero income with children. The children going hungry is a choice regardless of what the guardian would have you believe. Cap of £23k per year net so ~£28k per annum gross salary - which campaigners regard as poverty levels. In turn that is an insult to all those who work for less and provide food for their children etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
33 minutes ago, captainb said:

That was in relation to the Hong Kong definition.

As for kids going hungry in the school holidays - look up all the available benefits for those with zero income with children. The children going hungry is a choice regardless of what the guardian would have you believe. Cap of £23k per year net so ~£28k per annum gross salary - which campaigners regard as poverty levels. In turn that is an insult to all those who work for less and provide food for their children etc.

Another reason for my having Muted Zugs.  Just can't think clearly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
49 minutes ago, Killer Bunny said:

Another reason for my having Muted Zugs.  Just can't think clearly.

You're the only one who's confused.

Or should I say, routinely dishonest. You claim in one breath not to time the market then in the next boast of 'locking in' ten weeks of gains. Advise naive readers of this forum (unaware of your HPC history) that cash is trash, and five minutes later flatly contradict yourself.

Eyes on you, Tufton Street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
1 hour ago, captainb said:

That was in relation to the Hong Kong definition.

As for kids going hungry in the school holidays - look up all the available benefits for those with zero income with children. The children going hungry is a choice regardless of what the guardian would have you believe. Cap of £23k per year net so ~£28k per annum gross salary - which campaigners regard as poverty levels. In turn that is an insult to all those who work for less and provide food for their children etc.

Pwned. :lol:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/16/boris-johnson-faces-tory-rebellion-over-marcus-rashfords-school-meals-call

Quote

Boris Johnson has executed a humiliating U-turn over free school meals for the poorest families over the summer, announcing a new £120m voucher scheme after pressure from footballer Marcus Rashford.

Just hours before Labour was due to force a vote on the issue in the House of Commons, risking a rebellion from Conservative backbenchers, the prime minister’s official spokesman announced a new £120m “Covid summer food fund”.

“Owing to the corona pandemic, the PM fully understands that children and parents face an entirely unprecedented situation over the summer,” he said.

The U-turn came after ministers repeatedly rejected the idea of extending the scheme over the summer, as they did over the Easter break.

Asked if Rashford’s pleas had helped to change the prime minister’s mind, his spokesman said: “The prime minister welcomes Marcus Rashford’s contribution to the debate around poverty, and respects the fact that he has been using his profile as a sportsman to highlight important issues.

He said families entitled to free school meals would receive a one-off voucher at the end of the school term, worth £15 a week for the six-week school break, which they can spend in supermarkets.

Rashford had stepped up his campaign to pressure the UK government into feeding hungry children during the school holidays.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
37 minutes ago, captainb said:

Great. The government is run by the tabloid press? Only just worked that out?

Correct.  It's the reason we have nonsense Lockdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
4 hours ago, captainb said:

Great. The government is run by the tabloid press? Only just worked that out?

Pwned? - are you eligible for the free school meals?

?

Imagine getting yourself into a indignant lather over giving under-privileged kids a square meal every day!

If you alt Reich skidmarks had any sense of your own ridiculousness you'd die of shame on the spot.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
3 hours ago, Killer Bunny said:

Correct.  It's the reason we have nonsense Lockdown.

Sorry, Tufton Street. The lockdown clusterf**k is all on Bozo and Cummings.

The rest of us are just glad to see a grown up at No. 10 for a change. :D

6d36b-1536941847-800.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
41 minutes ago, zugzwang said:

?

Imagine getting yourself into a indignant lather over giving under-privileged kids a square meal every day!

If you alt Reich skidmarks had any sense of your own ridiculousness you'd die of shame on the spot.

 

Ok so you are a child the posts make sense. 

 

Come back when you have lived a little 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
28 minutes ago, captainb said:

Ok so you are a child the posts make sense. 

 

How difficult is it to understand a young man talking about his own experience of going hungry?

 

30 minutes ago, captainb said:

Come back when you have lived a little 

Relax, Captain Skidmark. I'm not going anywhere.

And it's just as well, because if I don't show up here regularly there's not much point in the rest of you mooks putting in a shift!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
Just now, zugzwang said:

How difficult is it to understand a young man talking about his own experience of going hungry?

 

Relax, Captain Skidmark. I'm not going anywhere.

And it's just as well, because if I don't show up here regularly there's not much point in the rest of you mooks putting in a shift!

Yawn. 

Im sure that 15 quid a week voucher for 6 weeks, when added to the 20/23k a year benefits will make all the difference and is not just virtue signaling. 

If only the schools would restart the children are clearly getting restless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
On 16/06/2020 at 19:31, captainb said:

Yawn. 

Im sure that 15 quid a week voucher for 6 weeks, when added to the 20/23k a year benefits will make all the difference and is not just virtue signaling. 

If only the schools would restart the children are clearly getting restless. 

If I had 20/23k a year I wouldn't think £15 a week was insignificant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
On 16/06/2020 at 19:31, captainb said:

Yawn. 

Im sure that 15 quid a week voucher for 6 weeks, when added to the 20/23k a year benefits will make all the difference and is not just virtue signaling. 

If only the schools would restart the children are clearly getting restless. 

I believe only England moved to vouchers. My wife is out now delivering cooked lunches to people who can't get to the school. And there's close to a hundred who can get to school  queuing each day to pick up food so I'd imagine, even for a basic ham sandwich and a packet of crisps, they believe its worth it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
24
HOLA4425

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information